2022年河南专升本考试考试真题卷（7）.docx

2022年河南专升本考试考试真题卷（7）本卷共分为1大题50小题，作答时间为180分钟，总分100分，60分及格。一、单项选择题（共50题，每题2分。每题的备选项中，只有一个最符合题意） 1.A land not suffering from destruction, plus wealth, natural resources, and labour supply-all these were important factors in helping England to become the center for the Industrial Revolution. (21) they were not enough. Something else was needed to start the industrial process. That some thing special was men- (22) individuals who could invent machines, find new (23) of power,The men who (24) the machines of the Industrial Revolution (25) from many backgrounds and many occupations. Many of them were (26) inventors than scientists. A man who is pure scientist is primarily interested in doing his research (27) . He is not necessarily working and that his findings can be used.An inventor or one interested in applied science is usually trying to make something that has a real and specific (28) . He may try to solve a problem by using the theories of science or by experimenting through trial and error. Regardless of his method, he is working to obtain a (29) result: the construction of a harvesting machine, the burning of light bulb, or one of (30) other objectives. Most of the people who developed the machines were inventors, not trained scientists.27（）AhappilyBoccasionallyCreluctantlyDaccurately2.A land not suffering from destruction, plus wealth, natural resources, and labour supply-all these were important factors in helping England to become the center for the Industrial Revolution. (21) they were not enough. Something else was needed to start the industrial process. That some thing special was men- (22) individuals who could invent machines, find new (23) of power,The men who (24) the machines of the Industrial Revolution (25) from many backgrounds and many occupations. Many of them were (26) inventors than scientists. A man who is pure scientist is primarily interested in doing his research (27) . He is not necessarily working and that his findings can be used.An inventor or one interested in applied science is usually trying to make something that has a real and specific (28) . He may try to solve a problem by using the theories of science or by experimenting through trial and error. Regardless of his method, he is working to obtain a (29) result: the construction of a harvesting machine, the burning of light bulb, or one of (30) other objectives. Most of the people who developed the machines were inventors, not trained scientists.29（）AoriginsBsourcesCbasesDdiscoveries3.A land not suffering from destruction, plus wealth, natural resources, and labour supply-all these were important factors in helping England to become the center for the Industrial Revolution. (21) they were not enough. Something else was needed to start the industrial process. That some thing special was men- (22) individuals who could invent machines, find new (23) of power,The men who (24) the machines of the Industrial Revolution (25) from many backgrounds and many occupations. Many of them were (26) inventors than scientists. A man who is pure scientist is primarily interested in doing his research (27) . He is not necessarily working and that his findings can be used.An inventor or one interested in applied science is usually trying to make something that has a real and specific (28) . He may try to solve a problem by using the theories of science or by experimenting through trial and error. Regardless of his method, he is working to obtain a (29) result: the construction of a harvesting machine, the burning of light bulb, or one of (30) other objectives. Most of the people who developed the machines were inventors, not trained scientists.30（）AButBAndCBesidesDEven4.Passage OneThe strange close understanding between twins is a familiar enough phenomenon. Often they seem to understand each other and share each other’ s emotions to such an extent that one suspects some kinds of thought communication.What is not so widely known is that this special relationship often acts as brake on twins’ intellectual development. As they are partly isolated in their own private world, twins communicate less with adults than do other children. The verbal ability of a four-year-old twin is typically six months behind that of a non-twin. The problem can be particularly severe in a deprived home, a one-parent family for example, where there is little stimulation for children anyway.Such children, while capable of mutual comprehension in a private language, often remain in comprehensible to outsiders and thus at a severe educational disadvantage. The only solution to the problem, cruel though it may seem, is to separate the twins thus forcing them to acquire ordinary speech helped and guided by sympathetic parents and teachers."A deprived" family in ParA2 may refer to（）A. the family where the parents are divorcedB. the family which is in poor conditionC. the family where the children are less educatedD. all of the above5.Passage OneThe strange close understanding between twins is a familiar enough phenomenon. Often they seem to understand each other and share each other’ s emotions to such an extent that one suspects some kinds of thought communication.What is not so widely known is that this special relationship often acts as brake on twins’ intellectual development. As they are partly isolated in their own private world, twins communicate less with adults than do other children. The verbal ability of a four-year-old twin is typically six months behind that of a non-twin. The problem can be particularly severe in a deprived home, a one-parent family for example, where there is little stimulation for children anyway.Such children, while capable of mutual comprehension in a private language, often remain in comprehensible to outsiders and thus at a severe educational disadvantage. The only solution to the problem, cruel though it may seem, is to separate the twins thus forcing them to acquire ordinary speech helped and guided by sympathetic parents and teachers.Many people don' t know that （）Atwins understand each other very wellBtwins are slow to learn to talkCtwins are unlikely to do less well at school than other childrenDthere exists more communication between twins6.Passage OneThe strange close understanding between twins is a familiar enough phenomenon. Often they seem to understand each other and share each other’ s emotions to such an extent that one suspects some kinds of thought communication.What is not so widely known is that this special relationship often acts as brake on twins’ intellectual development. As they are partly isolated in their own private world, twins communicate less with adults than do other children. The verbal ability of a four-year-old twin is typically six months behind that of a non-twin. The problem can be particularly severe in a deprived home, a one-parent family for example, where there is little stimulation for children anyway.Such children, while capable of mutual comprehension in a private language, often remain in comprehensible to outsiders and thus at a severe educational disadvantage. The only solution to the problem, cruel though it may seem, is to separate the twins thus forcing them to acquire ordinary speech helped and guided by sympathetic parents and teachers.What' s the reason for twins to be at a disadvantage in their intellectual development（）AThey can only understand their own private language.BThey communicate with outsiders less than non-twins.CThere is little stimulation for them.DAdults don' t like to talk with them.7.Passage OneThe strange close understanding between twins is a familiar enough phenomenon. Often they seem to understand each other and share each other’ s emotions to such an extent that one suspects some kinds of thought communication.What is not so widely known is that this special relationship often acts as brake on twins’ intellectual development. As they are partly isolated in their own private world, twins communicate less with adults than do other children. The verbal ability of a four-year-old twin is typically six months behind that of a non-twin. The problem can be particularly severe in a deprived home, a one-parent family for example, where there is little stimulation for children anyway.Such children, while capable of mutual comprehension in a private language, often remain in comprehensible to outsiders and thus at a severe educational disadvantage. The only solution to the problem, cruel though it may seem, is to separate the twins thus forcing them to acquire ordinary speech helped and guided by sympathetic parents and teachers.The writer mentions all of the items listed below except （）Atwins can help each otherBtwins share each other's emotionCtwins are able to understand each other in a private languageDtwins communicate less with their parents8.Passage OneThe strange close understanding between twins is a familiar enough phenomenon. Often they seem to understand each other and share each other’ s emotions to such an extent that one suspects some kinds of thought communication.What is not so widely known is that this special relationship often acts as brake on twins’ intellectual development. As they are partly isolated in their own private world, twins communicate less with adults than do other children. The verbal ability of a four-year-old twin is typically six months behind that of a non-twin. The problem can be particularly severe in a deprived home, a one-parent family for example, where there is little stimulation for children anyway.Such children, while capable of mutual comprehension in a private language, often remain in comprehensible to outsiders and thus at a severe educational disadvantage. The only solution to the problem, cruel though it may seem, is to separate the twins thus forcing them to acquire ordinary speech helped and guided by sympathetic parents and teachers.The author probably feels that twins' problem （）Acan not be solved because situation is very cruelBcan be solved because twins will be separatedCcan not be solved unless the twins are forced to live in an ordinary environmentDcan be solved if the adults communicate with them more often9.Passage TwoClifford Stoll ran a computer system in Berkeley, California. As a system administrator, he kept a close eye on the records. One day, Stoll found something strange in the payment record. There was a 75 cents mistake. One of the thousands of users had used the system for 75 cents worth of time and not paid for it.It might sound like very little money to worry about. But that 75 cents was the first clue Stoll had to a much bigger problem-that a hacker had broken into Stoll’ s computer system. Who was it Stoll spent the next year trying to find out. During that time the hacker used the system in Berkeley as a starting point to break into military computer systems all over the United States.Stoll had to keep track of the hacker’s activities on the computer without the hacker’ s knowing someone was watching him. Stoll even made up huge files of false information so the hacker would have lots to read. When the hacker spent long time reading, the telephone company was able to trace the lines. After a year, the hacker was traced back to his computer-in Germany. He was later caught by the German police.The 75 cents mistake（）Awas a sign that someone had broken into Stoll' s systemBwould cause serious health problemsCwould make Stoll a very rich manDwas found out by a Berkeley student10.Passage TwoClifford Stoll ran a computer system in Berkeley, California. As a system administrator, he kept a close eye on the records. One day, Stoll found something strange in the payment record. There was a 75 cents mistake. One of the thousands of users had used the system for 75 cents worth of time and not paid for it.It might sound like very little money to worry about. But that 75 cents was the first clue Stoll had to a much bigger problem-that a hacker had broken into Stoll’ s computer system. Who was it Stoll spent the next year trying to find out. During that time the hacker used the system in Berkeley as a starting point to break into military computer systems all over the United States.Stoll had to keep track of the hacker’s activities on the computer without the hacker’ s knowing someone was watching him. Stoll even made up huge files of false information so the hacker would have lots to read. When the hacker spent long time reading, the telephone company was able to trace the lines. After a year, the hacker was traced back to his computer-in Germany. He was later caught by the German police.75 cents（）Ais a large sum of moneyBis a small sum of moneyCis important in a computer systemDcan buy a computer at that time11.Passage TwoClifford Stoll ran a computer system in Berkeley, California. As a system administrator, he kept a close eye on the records. One day, Stoll found something strange in the payment record. There was a 75 cents mistake. One of the thousands of users had used the system for 75 cents worth of time and not paid for it.It might sound like very little money to worry about. But that 75 cents was the first clue Stoll had to a much bigger problem-that a hacker had broken into Stoll’ s computer system. Who was it Stoll spent the next year trying to find out. During that time the hacker used the system in Berkeley as a starting point to break into military computer systems all over the United States.Stoll had to keep track of the hacker’s activities on the computer without the hacker’ s knowing someone was watching him. Stoll even made up huge files of false information so the hacker would have lots to read. When the hacker spent long time reading, the telephone company was able to trace the lines. After a year, the hacker was traced back to his computer-in Germany. He was later caught by the German police.Clifford Stoll comes from（）AGermanyBItalyCthe U.S.A.DChina12.Passage TwoClifford Stoll ran a computer system in Berkeley, California. As a system administrator, he kept a close eye on the records. One day, Stoll found something strange in the payment record. There was a 75 cents mistake. One of the thousands of users had used the system for 75 cents worth of time and not paid for it.It might sound like very little money to worry about. But that 75 cents was the first clue Stoll had to a much bigger problem-that a hacker had broken into Stoll’ s computer system. Who was it Stoll spent the next year trying to find out. During that time the hacker used the system in Berkeley as a starting point to break into military computer systems all over the United States.Stoll had