欢迎来到淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站! | 帮助中心 好文档才是您的得力助手!
淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站
全部分类
  • 研究报告>
  • 管理文献>
  • 标准材料>
  • 技术资料>
  • 教育专区>
  • 应用文书>
  • 生活休闲>
  • 考试试题>
  • pptx模板>
  • 工商注册>
  • 期刊短文>
  • 图片设计>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换

    2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷.pdf

    • 资源ID:38616429       资源大小:8.44MB        全文页数:9页
    • 资源格式: PDF        下载积分:5金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    会员登录下载
    微信登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录   QQ登录  
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要5金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷.pdf

    2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷(总分:144.00,做题时间:90分钟) 一、Use of English( 总题数:2,分数:80.00) 1.Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank Section I Use of EnglishDirections: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D.and mark A, B, C or D.(分数:40.00)_ Though not biologically related, friends are as related as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is【B1】_1 a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has【B2】_ The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted【B3】_1, 932 unique subjects which【B4】_pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both【B5】_ While 1 % may seem【B6】_, it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says,Most people do not even【B7】_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who【B8】_our kin. The study【B9】_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now. 【B10】_, as the team suggests,it draws us to similar environments but there is more【B11】_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that【B12】_us in choosing genetically similar friends【B13】_functional kinship of being friends with【B14】_! One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving 【B15】_than other genes. Studying this could help【B16】_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major【B17】_factor. The findings do not simply explain peoples【B18】_to befriend those of similar【B19】_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to【B20】_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.(分数:40.00)(1).【B1】(分数:2.00)A.when B.why C.how D.what (2).【B2】(分数:2.00)A.defended B.concluded C.withdrawn D.advised (3).【B3】(分数:2.00)A.for B.with C.on D.by (4).【B4】(分数:2.00)A.compared B.sought C.separated D.connected (5).【B5】(分数:2.00)A.tests B.objects C.samples D.examples (6).【B6】(分数:2.00)A.insignificant B.unexpected C.unreliable D.incredible (7).【B7】(分数:2.00)A.visit B.miss C.seek D.know (8).【B8】(分数:2.00)A.resemble B.influence C.favor D.surpass (9).【B9】(分数:2.00)A.again B.also C.instead D.thus (10).【B10】(分数:2.00)A.Meanwhile B.Furthermore C.Likewise D.Perhaps (11).【B11】(分数:2.00)A.about B.to C.from D.like (12).【B12】(分数:2.00)A.drive B.observe C.confuse D.limit (13).【B13】(分数:2.00)A.according to B.rather than C.regardless of D.along with (14).【B14】(分数:2.00)A.chances B.responses C.missions D.benefits (15).【B15】(分数:2.00)A.later B.slower C.faster D.earlier (16).【B16】(分数:2.00)A.forecast B.remember C.understand D.express (17).【B17】(分数:2.00)A.unpredictable B.contributory C.controllable D.disruptive (18).【B18】(分数:2.00)A.endeavor B.decision C.arrangement D.tendency (19).【B19】(分数:2.00)A.political B.religious C.ethnic D.economic (20).【B20】(分数:2.00)A.see B.show C.prove D.tell 二、Reading Comprehension( 总题数:10,分数:60.00) 2.Section II Reading ComprehensionSection II Reading Comprehension_ 3.Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D.D._ King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted kings dont abdicate, they die in their sleep. But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles? The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above mere politics and embody a spirit of national unity. It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs, continuing popularity as heads of state. And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms(not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure. Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very historyand sometimes the way they behave todayembodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modem democratic states. The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses(or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international l%,and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image. While Europes monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example. It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchys reputation with her rather ordinary(if well-heeled)granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a serviceas non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchys worst enemies.(分数:10.00)(1).According to the first two paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain(分数:2.00)A.used to enjoy high public support. B.was unpopular among European royals. C.eased his relationship with his rivals. D.ended his reign in embarrassment. (2).Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly(分数:2.00)A.owing to their undoubted and respectable status. B.to achieve a balance between tradition and reality. C.to give voters more public figures to look up to. D.due to their everlasting political embodiment. (3).Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?(分数:2.00)A.Aristocrats excessive reliance on inherited wealth. B.The role of the nobility in modem democracies. C.The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families. D.The nobilitys adherence to their privileges. (4).The British royals have most to fear because Charles(分数:2.00)A.takes a tough line on political issues. B.fails to change his lifestyle as advised. C.takes republicans as his potential allies. D.fails to adapt himself to his future role. (5).Which of the following is the best title of the text?(分数:2.00)A.Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined B.Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne C.Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs D.Charles, Slow to React to the Coming Threats Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest. California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies. The court would be recklessly modest if it followed Californias advice. Enough of the implications are discemable,even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police,lawyers and defendants. They should start by discarding Californias lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone-a vast storehouse of digital informationis similar to, say, going through a suspects purse. The court has ruled that police dont violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring ones smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestees reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of cloud computing, meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier. Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitutions prohibition on unreasonable searches. As so often is the case,stating that principle doesnt ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom. But the justices should not swallow Californias argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitutions protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.(分数:10.00)(1).The Supreme Court will work out whether, during ah arrest, it is legitimate to(分数:2.00)A.prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents. B.search for suspects mobile phones without a warrant. C.check suspects phone contents without being authorized. D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones. (2).The authors attitude toward Californias argument is one of(分数:2.00)A.disapproval. B.indifference. C.tolerance. D.cautiousness. (3).The author believes that exploring ones phone contents is comparable to(分数:2.00)A.getting into ones residence. B.handling ones historical records. C.scanning ones correspondences. D.going through ones wallet. (4).In Paragraphs 5 and 6,the author shows his concern that(分数:2.00)A.principles are hard to be clearly expressed. B.the court is giving police less room for action. C.citizens privacy is not effectively protected. D.phones are used to store sensitive information. (5).Orin Kerrs comparison is quoted to indicate that(分数:2.00)A.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly. B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution. C.Californias argument violates principles of the Constitution. D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered. The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process,editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings. Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal, writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journals internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts. Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: The creation of the statistics board was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Sciences overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish. Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group, says he expects the board to play primarily an advisory role. He agreed to join because he found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science. John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is a most welcome step forward and long overdue. Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays,statistical review is more essential than expert review, he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review. Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux,a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process. Vaux says that Sciences idea to pass some papers to statisticians has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify the papers that need scrutiny in the first place.(分数:10.00)(1).It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that(分数:2.00)A.Science intends to simplify its peer-review process. B.journals are strengthening their statistical checks. C.few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis. D.lack of data analysis is common in research projects. (2).The phrase flagged up(Para. 2)is the closest in meaning to(分数:2.00)A.found. B.marked. C.revised. D.stored. (3).Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may(分数:2.00)A.pose a threat to all its peers. B.meet with strong opposition. C.increase Sciences circulation. D.set an example for other journals. (4).David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now(分数:2.00)A.adds to researchers workload. B.diminishes the role of reviewers. C.has room for further improvement. D.is to fail in the foreseeable future. (5

    注意事项

    本文(2015年考研英语(一)真题试卷.pdf)为本站会员(he****i)主动上传,淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    关于淘文阁 - 版权申诉 - 用户使用规则 - 积分规则 - 联系我们

    本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

    工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号 © 2020-2023 www.taowenge.com 淘文阁 

    收起
    展开