欢迎来到淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站! | 帮助中心 好文档才是您的得力助手!
淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站
全部分类
  • 研究报告>
  • 管理文献>
  • 标准材料>
  • 技术资料>
  • 教育专区>
  • 应用文书>
  • 生活休闲>
  • 考试试题>
  • pptx模板>
  • 工商注册>
  • 期刊短文>
  • 图片设计>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换

    PMworkingpape—绩效管理讲座(英文DOC16.docx

    • 资源ID:63349057       资源大小:160.72KB        全文页数:30页
    • 资源格式: DOCX        下载积分:20金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    会员登录下载
    微信登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录   QQ登录  
    二维码
    微信扫一扫登录
    下载资源需要20金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
    如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    PMworkingpape—绩效管理讲座(英文DOC16.docx

    Stevve SSherrrettta十一月 18, 2022Perfformmancce MManaagemmentt:Enhaanciing Exeecuttionn Thhrouugh a CCultturee off DiialoogueePeteer iis CChieef EExeccutiive Offficeer ffor a mmediicall suupplly mmulttinaatioonall thhat reccenttly craafteed aa neew sstraateggy tto ccounnterr coompeetittivee thhreaats. Thhe pplann sttresssedd thhe nneedd too cuut ccyclle ttimee, cconccenttratte ssalees oon hhighher-marrginn prroduuctss annd ddeveelopp neew mmarkketss. Fourr moonthhs aafteer ccircculaatinng tthe plaan, Petter didd a “waalkaarouund” to seee hoow tthinngs werre ggoinng. Hee waas aappaalleed. Eveerywwherre PPeteer tturnned peooplee, ddepaartmmenttswwholle bbusiinesss uunittsssimpply diddntt “gget it.”Firsst ssurpprisse: Enggineeeriing. TThe grooup hadd cuut pprodductt deesiggn ttimee 300%, meeetinng iits goaal tto iincrreasse sspeeed-tto-mmarkket. GGoodd. Theen PPeteer aaskeed hhow mannufaactuurinng wwoulld bbe aaffeecteed. Itt tuurneed oout thee neew ddesiign wouuld takke mmuchh moore timme tto mmakee. Tottal cyccle timme aactuuallly iincrreassed. “OOur strrateegicc pllan messsagge iis nnot reaallyy geettiing thrrouggh,” Petter thooughht.Secoond surrpriise: Saaless. Thee neew sstraateggy ccallled forr a shiiftempphassizee hiigh marrginn saaless raatheer tthatt puushiing prooducct ddownn thhe ppipeelinne aas ffastt ass poossiiblee. Butt juust aboout eveery sallesppersson Petter spooke to wass maakinng ttrannsacctioonall saaless too hiigh-vollumee cuustoomerrs; harrdlyy annyonne wwas buiildiing rellatiionsshipps wwithh thhe mmostt prrofiitabble proospeectss. Salles is doiing jusst wwhatt itts alwwayss doone, Peeterr thhougght. Worsst ssurpprisse: Eveen hhis topp teeam, thhe ppeopple whood hellpedd hiim ccrafft tthe strrateegy, waas nnot stiickiing to plaan. Peeterr asskedd a teaam mmembber: “WWhy aree yoou sspenndinng aall youur ttimee maakinng ssuree thhe nnew macchinneryy iss woorkiing inssteaad oof ddeveeloppingg neew mmarkketss?”“Beccausse mmy uunitts chiief goaal wwas to impprovve oon-ttimee deelivveryy,” he ansswerred. “Butt whhat aboout commpanny ggoalls?” saiid PPeteer. “Wee caame up witth aa goood plaan aand commmunnicaatedd itt veery cleearlly. Buut nnowhheree itt issntt beeingg caarriied outt. Whyy?”Manyy orrgannizaatioons creeatee goood strrateegiees, butt onnly thee beest exeecutte tthemm efffecctivvelyy. Forrtunne mmagaazinne eestiimattes thaat wwhenn CEEOs faiil, 70% off thhe ttimee itts beccausse oof bbad exeecuttionn. “Why CEOs Fail,” by Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin, Fortune magazine, June 21, 1999. Weaak eexeccutiion is perrvassivee inn thhe bbusiinesss wworlld, butt thhe rreassonss foor iit aare larrgelly mmisuundeersttoodd. Whyy iss itt thhat no onee inn Peeterrs orgganiizattionn waas aactiing in synnc wwithh thhe sstraateggy? Unnlesss wwe uundeersttandd thhe rreassonss, wwe ccant hhopee too soolvee thhe pprobblemm.Imagginee soomeoone hitttinng aa teenniis bballl. Wheen tthe braain sayys “hhit thee baall,” iit ddoessntt auutommatiicallly happpenn. Thee meessaage traavells tthrooughh neervee paathwwayss doown thee arrm aand croossees ggapss beetweeen thee neervee ceellss. Theese gapps, or “syynappsess,” aree pootenntiaal bbreaaks in thee coonneectiion. IIf nneurrotrranssmittterrs ddont ccarrry tthe messsagge aacrooss thee gaap, thee meessaage nevver getts tthrooughh, oor iit ggetss diistoorteed. Wheen tthatt haappeens, eiitheer tthe armm dooesnnt movve aat aall, orr itt moovess thhe wwronng wway.Creaatinng aa “ccultturee off diialooguee”Justt liike a nnervvouss syysteem, orgganiizattionns aalsoo haave gapps tthatt bllockk annd ddisttortt meessaagess. Thee seecreet tto eeffeectiive strrateegy exeecuttionn liies in croossiing hieerarrchiicall annd ffuncctioonall gaaps witth ccleaar, connsisstennt mmesssagees tthatt reelayy thhe sstraateggy tthrooughhoutt thhe oorgaanizzatiion. SSounnd ssimpple? Its nnot. TThe reaasonn iss thhat thee “nneurrotrranssmittterrs” in orgganiizattionns aare humman beiingssexxecuutivve tteamm meembeers, seenioor mmanaagerrs, midddlee maanaggerss annd ssupeerviisorrswwhosse jjob it is to makke ssuree thhat peooplees behhaviior is aliigneed wwithh thhe ooverralll sttrattegyy. Doiing whaat iit ttakees tto aachiievee allignnmennt iis vveryy diiffiicullt. Itt iss whhat Ramm Chharaan ccallls, thee “hheavvy llifttingg” oof mmanaagemmentt, aand its tthe keyy too exxecuutinng sstraateggy. As wwelll ssee latter, thheree iss ann immporrtannt ddifffereencee beetweeen commpanniess thhat succcesssfuullyy allignn beehavviorr wiith strrateegy andd thhosee thhat do nott. Commpanniess thhat efffecttiveely exeecutte sstraateggy ccreaate a “ccultturee off diialooguee.” A cullturre oof ddialloguue eencoouraagess peervaasivve ttwo-wayy coommuuniccatiionss whheree inndivviduualss annd ggrouups 1) queestiion, chhalllengge, intterpprett annd uultiimattelyy cllariify strrateegicc obbjecctivves; annd 22) eengaage in reggulaar pperfformmancce ddialloguue tto mmoniitorr beehavviorr annd eensuure it is aliigneed wwithh sttrattegyy. Threee kkeyss too maanaggingg peerfoormaanceeA cuultuure of diaaloggue doeesnt hhapppen insstanntlyy, aany morre tthann a fluuid tennniss sttrokke ddoess. It takkes praactiice, peersiisteencee annd hhardd woork. SSo hhow exaactlly ccan leaaderrs eensuure thaat sstraateggy mmesssagees ggo aall thee waay ddownn thhe llineethhat thee teenniis bballl geets hitt coorreectlly? Thhe tthreee kkeyss too maanaggingg peerfoormaancee efffecctivvelyy arre:1. Achiieviing raddicaal cclarrityy byy deecoddingg sttrattegyy att thhe ttop. MManyy orrgannizaatioons thiink theey ssendd cllearr siignaals butt doontt. In somme ccasees, mannageers subborddinaate brooad strrateegicc gooalss too opperaatioonall gooalss wiithiin ttheiir ssiloos. Thhats wwhatt haappeenedd wiith Petters ttop teaam. Ellsewwherre, topp teeam memmberrs oofteen hhavee tooo mmanyy “ttop” priioriitieeswwevve sseenn ass maany as 1000 inn onne ccaseewhhichh reesullts in mixxed siggnalls aand bluurreed ffocuus. Sttrattegyy deecodde rrequuirees wwinnnowiing priioriitiees ddownn too a mannageeablle nnumbberas litttlee ass fiive. 2. Setttingg upp syysteems andd prroceessees tto eensuure claaritty. Oncce sstraateggy iis ccleaar, orgganiizattionns mmustt crreatte pproccessses to enssuree thhat thee riightt sttrattegyy meessaagess caascaade dowwn tthe orgganiizattionn. Theese inccludde: strrateegy-cennterred buddgett annd pplannninng ssesssionns; staaff andd teeam meeetinngs to disscusss ggoalls; perrforrmannce mannageemennt mmeettinggs; andd taalennt rreviiew sesssioons. DDialloguue ddrivves alll thhesee prroceessees. Eaach reppressentts aa “ttrannsmiitteer ooppoortuunitty,” wheere strrateegicc meessaagess arre cconvveyeed aand beehavviorr iss allignned witth ggoalls.3. Aliggninng aand diffferrenttiattingg reewarrds.Leaaderrs mmustt maake surre rrewaardss enncouuragge bbehaavioors connsisstennt wwithh sttrattegyy, wwhicch ssounnds eassy bbut isnnt. DDifffereentiiatiion is aboout makkingg suure thaat sstarrs gget siggnifficaantlly mmoree thhan pooor pperfformmerss. Butt allmosst eeverrywhheree maanaggerss diistrribuute rewwardds mmoree orr leess eveenlyy. As well seee, llackk off efffecctivve pperfformmancce ddialloguue iis aa keey cconttribbutoor tto ddysffuncctioonall reewarrd sscheemess.We llistt thhesee thhreee ittemss seeparrateely butt thhey aree, oof ccourrse, innterrconnnecctedd. Sysstemms aand proocesssess deepennd oon cclarrityy frrom thee toop. Diiffeerenntiaatioon aand aliignmmentt off reewarrds deppendd onn maanaggerss ussingg peerfoormaancee syysteems efffecttiveely. DDialloguue iis tthe gluue tthatt hooldss itt alll ttogeetheer. Buut nnot jusst aany diaaloggue willl ddo. Itt muust be diaaloggue witth ppurpposee, ffocuusedd onn peerfoormaancee.Linkk too coompaany valluattionnComppaniies thaat mmanaage perrforrmannce welllGGeneerall Ellecttricc coomess too miindhavve hhighher marrkett vaaluaatioons. WWhy? BBecaausee, mmoree annd mmoree, iinsttituutioonall innvesstorrs vvieww sttrattegyy exxecuutioon aas aa viitall faactoor iinflluenncinng sstocck ppricces.Justt a feww yeearss aggo iinsttituutioonall innvesstorrs rreliied almmostt exxcluusivvelyy onn fiinannciaal mmeassurees ffor commpanny vvaluuatiionss. NNow 35% off a marrkett vaaluaatioon iis iinflluenncedd byy noon-ffinaanciial, inntanngibble facctorrs, acccorddingg too a stuudy by Ernnst & YYounng. Based on a study conducted by Sarah Mavrinac and Tony Siesfeld for the Ernst & Young Center for Business Innovation. Thhe sstuddy sshowwed thaat “eexeccutiion of corrporratee sttrattegyy” aand “maanaggemeent creedibbiliity” rannkedd nuumbeer oone andd nuumbeer ttwo in impporttancce tto iinsttituutioonall innvesstorrs oout of 22 nonn-fiinannciaal mmeassurees. Joohn Incch, a mmanaaginng ddireectoor aand anaalysst aat BBearr Sttearrns nottes thaat iin ssomee seectoors, suuch as divverssifiied inddusttriaal ccomppaniies, inntanngibbless acccouunt forr evven morreuup tto hhalff a commpannyss vaaluee. “Yoou ccan takke eevenn a munndanne aasseet aand injjectt goood mannageemennt aand havve ssomeethiing preettyy sttronng,” sayys IInchh. 1. AAchiievee Raadiccal Claaritty bby ddecoodinng sstraateggy aat tthe toppThe firrst steep iin ssucccesssfullly exeecuttingg sttrattegyy iss acchieevinng cclarrityy onn thhe ttop teaam, whiich is freequeentlly tthe souurcee off gaarblled siggnalls. Lackk off Cllariity at thee ToopA reecennt HHay Grooup stuudy Hay Group partnered with Richard Hackman of Harvard University and Ruth Wageman of Dartmouth College to identify the dynamics of top executive teams and their impact on performance. From an initial group of 48 teams, the researchers narrowed their study to 14 teams, many from large global organizations. Each team member represented the head of an organization, a major business division, or a major geography. shoows a ddistturbbingg laack of claaritty oon ttop teaams (oorgaanizzatiionaal cclarrityy meeasuuress thhe eexteent to whiich empployyeess unnderrstaand whaat iis eexpeecteed oof tthemm annd hhow thoose exppecttatiionss coonneect witth tthe orgganiizattionns larrgerr gooalss). Thhe ccharrt bbeloow sshowws ddrammatiicallly higgherr leevells oof cclarrityy onn ouutsttanddingg vss. aaverragee teeamss. In facct tthe bigggesst ssinggle diffferrencce bbetwweenn grreatt annd aaverragee toop tteamms aand typpicaal ooness waas iin tthe levvel of intternnal claaritty. Seee Fiigurre 11.Figuure 1: Orgganiizattionnal Cliimatte aand Teaams58%18%Figure 1: Measures organizational climate dimensions for outstanding top teams vs. typical ones. For each dimension of climate we asked how the team was performing in reality and how it should be performing. Then we measured the difference or “gap” in their answers. Gaps over 20% hurt performance. The “clarity” gap for typical teams was 58% compared with 18% on outstanding teams. Chaangee Haay/MMcBeer tto “SSourrce: Haay GGrouup, Incc.” in finnal verrsioonAnd a LLackk off Cllariity BellowWorkkerss att loowerr leevells sstroonglly ffeell thhis lacck oof cclarrityy. Figguree 2 loooks at sattisffacttionn leevells ffor worrkerrs pplannninng tto lleavve ttheiir oorgaanizzatiionss wiithiin ttwo yeaars verrsuss thhosee pllannningg too sttay lonngerr. Thiis sstuddy sshowwed thaat aa keey rreasson peooplee leeavee thheirr joobs is thaat ttheyy feeel theeir commpanniess laack dirrecttionn. Eveen aamonng eemplloyeees plaanniing to staay mmoree thhan twoo yeearss att thheirr coompaaniees, onlly 557% fellt ttheiir oorgaanizzatiionss haad aa cllearr seensee off diirecctioon.Figuure 2: Keyy reeasoons whyy emmplooyeees lleavve ttheiir ccomppaniies Tootall % Sattisffiedd Source: Hay Group, Inc. The results are from our Employee Attitude Survey, which sampled some 300 companies representing more than 1 million workers. Our survey queried management, professionals, salespeople, information technologists, and clerical and hourly workers. The “gap” referred to in the table is the “satisfaction gap” between workers planning to leave within two years and those planning to stay longer.Satiisfaactiion witth:Emplloyeees plaanniing to staay mmoree thhan twoo yeearss (%)Emplloyeees plaanniing to leaave in lesss tthann twwo yyearrs (%)GAP(%)1. UUse of my skiillss annd aabillitiies83%49%34%2. AAbillityy off toop mmanaagemmentt74%41%33%3. CComppanyy haas ccleaar ssensse oof ddireectiion57%27%30%NOTTE; HIGGHLIIGHTT SEECTIION 3; MAKKE IIT PPOP GRAAPHIICALLLYClarrityy maatteersWhy do empployyeess crravee cllariity? TThinnk aabouut iit. Whhat couuld be morre ddemooralliziing thaan tthe reaalizzatiion thaat yyourr haard worrk iis nnot conntriibuttingg too ovveraall commpanny ggoalls? Empployyeess waant to do thee “rrighht” thiing, buut ttheyy caan oonlyy doo soo iff thhey knoow wwhatt thhe rrighht tthinngs aree. Unfoortuunattelyy, aas wwe ssaw in ourr oppeniing viggnettte, coompaaniees oofteen ddont ccommmuniicatte sstraateggic goaals efffecttiveely. AAn ooil reffineery cliientt, ffor exaamplle, sett a strrateegicc gooal to cutt coostss. TTo ssee howw weell thee meessaage hadd gootteen tthrooughh, aan ooperratiionss teeam leaaderr heeld a sstraateggy ddecoode sesssioon wwherre hhe qquizzzedd hiis tteamm meembeers on whaat ttheyy feelt wass thhe cchieef ppriooritty. Teen tteamm meembeers prooducced fouur ddifffereent “toop” objjecttivees, inccluddingg coost-cutttinng, saffetyy, eenviironnmenntall coomplliannce andd reeduccingg saaless prroceessiing timme. Thhe mmesssagee haadnt ggot thrrouggh. Thhe tteamm leeadeer ccallled hiss teeam toggethher andd crreatted a “ttrannsmiitteer ooppoortuunitty.” “Donnt youu guuys reaalizze tthatt iff wee caantt cuut oour reffiniing cossts by thrree cennts a ggalllon, thheyre goiing to shuut uus ddownn?” he saiid.“Is thaat aall youu neeed us to do?” rreplliedd thhe tteamm meembeers, taakenn abbackk. UUnitted by a ccleaar ddireectiion andd shhareed oowneershhip of thee caausee, tteamm meembeers entthussiassticcallly ccut cossts by fivve ccentts pper galllonn ovver thee foolloowinn

    注意事项

    本文(PMworkingpape—绩效管理讲座(英文DOC16.docx)为本站会员(you****now)主动上传,淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    关于淘文阁 - 版权申诉 - 用户使用规则 - 积分规则 - 联系我们

    本站为文档C TO C交易模式,本站只提供存储空间、用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。本站仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知淘文阁网,我们立即给予删除!客服QQ:136780468 微信:18945177775 电话:18904686070

    工信部备案号:黑ICP备15003705号 © 2020-2023 www.taowenge.com 淘文阁 

    收起
    展开