CVM数据分析中的半参数模型及实证研究.pdf
?34?9?Vol.34,No.92014?9?Systems Engineering Theory&PracticeSept.,2014?:1000-6788(2014)09-2332-07?:Q141;O212.4?:ACVM?,?,?,?(?,?150030)?(CVM)?.?CVM?,?(WTP)?,?WTP,?.?,?CVM?,?,?CVM?.?,?90.53?/?/?,?.?CVM?.?(CVM);?;COX?;?;?The semi-parametric model and empirical research in CVMAO Chang-lin,WANG Jing,GAO Qin,CHEN Hong-guang(Department of Management Science and Engineering,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,China)Abstract The contingent valuation method(CVM)is a availably,flexible non-market valuation methodwhich is widely used to evaluate the environmental goods,especially the landscape evaluation.The doublebounded dichotomous choice is the most effective format of contingent valuation models except that itcan not provide a direct estimate of the willingness to pay(WTP)and its parameter model can notfully fit the WTP as well as exploit the sample data information.This research provides a new pathby addressing an analysis method of the CVM based on survival analysis and builds a semi-parametricproportional hazards model to analyse the impact factors of willingness to pay.Taking Sanjiang plainwetland landscape evaluation as an example,the willingness to pay of Sanjiang wetland landscape is RMB90.53 per year.Individual average annual income,educational background,respondents location and theattitudes to environment protect are the main risk factors which affect the willingness to pay.This researchshows the feasibility and effectiveness of the semi-parametric analysis methods to deal with the data ofdichotomous choice CVM.Keywordscontingent valuation method(CVM);survival analysis;COX proportional hazard model;Sanjiang Plain;landscape value1?(CVM)?,?,?12.CVM?,?Hicks?3.?CVM?(WTP)?(WTA),?.?:?,?.Hoehn?,?4,?:2012-12-27?:?(71171044);?(2013M531012);?(13DJJJ01)?:?(1964),?,?,?,?,?,?:?,E-mail:;?(1988),?,?,?,?,?:?.?9?,?:CVM?2333?,?“?”.?,?“?”?“?”?,?.?NOAA?CVM?CVM?5.?CVM?6?79?.?,?CVM?10,?11.?CVM?,?CVM?,?1213?.?WTP?,?,?.?CVM?,?CVM?1415,?1617?.?CVM?,?1820.?.?CVM?,?CVM?2,?WTP21.?,?CVM?,?,?22.?23?,?.?,?2425,?CVM?WTP?,?CVM?.?WTP?,?WTP?,?WTP?.?,?,?.2?26,?.?,?.?.2.1 WTP?CVM?,?WTP?“?”,?,?,?,?“?”,?“?”.?,?,?,?“?”,?“?”.?“?”?“?”?.?,?,?“?”?“?”.?:?T?“?”,?TU,?TL.?,?4?:“?-?”?“?-?”?“?-?”?“?-?”,?YY?YN?NY?NN.?WTP?,?,?1?.2.2 WTP?2.2.1 COX?h(t)?:h(t)=limt0P(t T t)t=h(t,x)(1)?,T?,x?,?.COX?,?h(t)?:?1?CVM?-?WTPTU?-?TWTPTU?-?TLWTPT?-?WTP ti?.?COX?:L()=n?i=1?h0(t)exp(1xi1+2xi2+mxim)?S?R(ti)h0(t)exp(1xs1+2xs2+mxsm)?i(4)?ti?H0(t)?:ln?h(t,X)h0t?=1x1+2x2+mxm(5)?S0(t)?H0(t)?:S0(t)=expH0(ti)(6)?:S(t;X)=S0(t)exp(1x1+2x2+mxm)=h(t,x)(7)?,S0(t)?t?,x?,?.2.2.2 CVM?CVM?WTP?,?WTP?COX?.?CVM?,?h(A)?:h(A)=limA0P(A T A)A=h(A,x)(8)?:A?,x?,?.WTP?:h(wtp)=h0(wtp)exp(1x1+2x2+mxm)(9)?:h0(wtp)?WTP?,x?WTP?,?,m?.?CVM?:L()=n?i=1?h0(wtp)exp(1xi1+2xi2+mxim)?S?R(Ai)h0(wtp)exp(1xs1+2xs2+mxsm)?i(10)?,?WTP?A,?A+A,?“?”?,?i=0,“?”?,?i=1.?L()?j?.?,xj?.?j 0?,xj?,?xj?:?j 0?,xj?,?xj?.WTP?:S(wtp;X)=S0(wtp)exp(1x1+2x2+mxm)=h(t,x)(11)3?3.1?:?,?.?,?,?.?,?.?27?,0,1,5,10,20,50,100,200?,?,?.?1?.?9?,?:CVM?2335?T?TU?TL?_?_?TL=WTPTT=WTPTU?1?CVM?.?.?.?.?1302?665?.3.2?3.2.1?1197?,?1003?,?194?,?77%,?29.1%.?,?1149?.?,?585?,?564?.?35.6%,?2?.?1?.?749?,?2?.?3?.?,?724?,?3?.?2?0.820.840.860.880.900.920.940.960.981.00050100150200250?3?2?11171140.97420.0171171140.97451161120.96640.0342332260.970101091020.93670.0643423280.9592094800.851120.1284364080.93650106840.792190.1795424920.90810097660.680260.2686395580.873200110720.655360.3277496300.847?3?-?-?-?-?4165103515?0.0570.0900.1420.7112336?34?3.2.2?WTP?(Wald)?,?9?,?edu,?,?4?5?.?4?con?,?5?,?ass?,?5?,?sign?,?5?,?sat?,?5?,?dis?,?,?inc?,?8?,?3000?,?6?5?(?)2?dfSig6000.90037.13760.000WTP?Cox?6?,?:ln?h(t,X)h0t?=0.159con 0.077ass 0.141sign+0.068sat+0.139add 0.006inc(12)?6?,?,?RR.?,?,?,?;?,?,?,?,?;?1,?1.?6?:?,?,?,?.?1.070,?,?,?,?.?1.149,?,?,?,?,?:?,?Loomis28?WTP“?”?.?,?.?,?,?,?.?,?,?.?,?,?.?,?,?,?,?.?6?95%?Wald?con0.1590.0548.47610.0040.8530.7670.950ass0.0770.0442.97010.0850.9260.8491.011sign0.1410.0625.11410.0240.8680.7680.981sat0.0680.0482.00510.1571.0700.9741.176add0.1390.0615.15810.0201.1491.0191.295inc0.0060.0026.80210.0090.9940.9890.9983.2.3?COX?:S(wtp;X)=S0(t)exp(0.159con 0.077ass 0.141sign+0.068sat+0.139add 0.006inc)(13)?4?5?.?4?5?:?9?,?:CVM?2337?,?,?:?,?,?.?4?5?,WTP?WTP?90.53?/?.4?CVM?WTP?,?WTP?,?WTP?,?WTP?,?WTP?.?:1)?WTP?,?COX?CVM?.2)?,?,?90.53?/?.?CVM?,?CVM?.3)?.?,?,?.?,?,?,?,?.?1?,?,?.?J.?,2001,21(11):19181926.Zhang Zhiqiang,Xu Zhongmin,Cheng Guodong.Valuation of ecosystem services and natural capitalJ.ActaEcologica Sinica,2001,21(11):19181926.2?,?.?J.?:?,2005,41(2):317328.Zhang Yin,Cai Yunlong.Using contingent valuation method to value environmental resources:A reviewJ.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2005,41(2):317328.3 Hanemann W M.Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responsesJ.AmericanJournal of Agricultural Economics,1984,66(3):332341.4 Hoehn J P,Randall A.A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuationJ.Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management,1987,14(3):12261247.5 Arrowk S.Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuationJ.Federal Registe,1993,58:46024614.6 Bishop R C,Heberlein T A.Measuring values of extra-Market goods:Are indirect measures biased?J.AmericanJournal of Agricultural,1979,61(5):926930.7 Cameron T A,Huppert D D.OLS versus ML estimation of nonmarket resource values with payment card intervaldataJ.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1989,17:230246.8 Blaine T W,Lichtkoppler F R,Jones K R,et al.Lichtkoppler,An assessment of household willingness to payfor curbside recycling:A comparison of payment card and referendum approachesJ.Journal of EnvironmentalManagement,2005,76:1522.2338?34?9?,?,?,?.?CVM?J.?,2009,29(7):6976.Yan Xiangbin,Li Yijun,Liang Yingchun,et al.Social benefit of China earth resource satellite and its CVMevaluation methodJ.Systems Engineering Theory&Practice,2009,29(7):6976.10 Manski C F,Thompson T S.Operational characteristics of maximum score estimationJ.Journal of Economet-rics,1986,32(1):85108.11 Kristr om B.A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuationstudiesJ.Land Economics,1990,66(2):135139.12 Sanz JA,Herrero L C,Bedate A M.Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods:A case study of theNational Museum of Sculpture in Valladolid,SpainJ.Journal of Cultural Economics,2003,27(34):241257.13 Crooker J R,Herriges J A.Parametric and semi-nonparametric estimation of willingness-to-pay in the dichoto-mous choice contingent valuation frameworkJ.Environmental and Resource Economics,2004,27(4):451480.14 Haab T C,McConnell K E.Referendum models and negative willingness to pay:Alternative solutionsJ.Journalof Environmental Economics and Management,1997,32(2):251270.15 Turnbull B W.Nonparametric estimation of survivorship function with doubly censored dataJ.Journal of theAmerican Statistical Association,1974,69:169173.16 Abdullah S,Jeanty P W.Willingness to pay for renewable energy:Evidence from a contingent valuation surveyin KenyaJ.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15:974983.17 MarcosA D,Manuel G,Angeles S G,et al.On dichotomous choice contingent valuation data analysis:Semi-parametric methods and genetic programming original research articleJ.Journal of Forest Economics,2010,16(2):145156.18 Carson R T,Mitchell R C,Hanemann M,et al.Contingent valuation and lost passive use:Damages from theExxon Valdez Oil SpillJ.Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25(3):257286.19 Crooker J R,Herriges J A.Parametric and semi-nonparametric estimation of willingness-to-pay in the dichoto-mous choice contingent valuation frameworkJ.Environmental and Resource Economics,2004,27(4):451480.20 An M Y.A semi parametric distribution for willingness to pay and statistical inference with dichotomous choicecontingent valuation dataJ.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,82:487500.21?,?.?CVM?J.?,2009,37(1):94104.Cai Xiping,Shen Yueqin.Application of parameter estimation to contingent valuation method based on durationanalysis:A case study of data analysis for Linan city,Zhejiang provinceJ.Journal of Northeast ForestryUniversity,2009,37(1):94104.22 Loureiro M L,Loomis J B,Nahuelhual L.A comparison of a parametric and a non-parametric method to valuea non-rejectable public goodJ.Journal of Forest Economics,2004,10(2):6174.23 Huang J C,Nychka D W,Smith V K.Semi-parametric discrete choice measures of willingness to payJ.Eco-nomics Letters,2008,101(1):9194.24?,?,?,?.?CVM?J.?,2010,30(23):64706477.Ao Changlin,Li Yijun,Feng Lei,et al.Evaluating the non-use value of Sanjiang wetland based on contigentvaluation methodJ.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(23):64706477.25?,?,?,?.?:?J.?,2013,33(16):51095117.Ao Changlin,Chen Jinting,Jiao Yang,et al.The effect of distance on the ecological conservation value:A casestudy of Sanjiang Plain WetlandJ.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(16):51095117?26 Cox D D R,Oakes D.Analysis of survival dataM.London:Chapman and Hall,1984.27?,?,?.?J.?,2012,42(1):5967.Feng Lei,Ao Changlin,Jiao Yang.Influencing factors of the willingness to pay for non-use value evaluation ofSanjiang wetlandJ.Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2012,42(1):5967.28 Loomis J B.How large is the extent of the market for public goods:Evidence from a nationwide contingentvaluation surveyJ.Applied Economics,1996,28(7):779782.