地方政府重大行政决策程序法治化探析,行政管理论文.docx

地方重大行政决策程序法治化探析,行政管理论文本篇论文目录导航：【题目】 地方重大行政决策程序法治化探析【第一章】【第二章】【第三章】【第四章】【第五章】【结束语/以下为参考文献】 摘 要 法令行则国治，法令弛则国乱。 法治是一个国家发展的重要保障，是治国理政的基本方式。厉行法治是当代社会的一项普遍的政治原则和社会行为准则，也是中国社会政治发展的必然归宿。重大行政决策因其广泛性、全局性、综合性的特征使其成为行政管理中的关键环节，越来越遭到社会各界的广泛关注。在行政权日益扩大化的今天，重大行政决策所面临的决策环境日益复杂，决策难度也随之增加，这就对地方做出重大行政决策提出了更高层次的要求。然而在实际的行政决策活动中， 拍脑袋决策，拍胸脯执行，拍屁股走人 的现象屡见不鲜。为了实现行政决策的科学化、民主化和法治化，减少决策失误造成的损失，保证国家行政管理的秩序，必需要有完善、统一的重大行政决策程序法律法规，以此为根据，按照法定程序制定重大行政决策、并严格依法执行，进而实现重大行政决策程序的法治化。因而，对于地方来讲，实现依法决策，推进重大行政决策程序法治化，不管是营造稳固的决策民意基础，还是保证各项工作的顺利完成，或是推进法治建设都具有非常重要的意义。 通过对现有重大行政决策程序法规、规章以及行政规范性文件的梳理，明晰了重大行政决策程序立法层面的现在状况，并结合重大行政决策程序的执行状况，进一步分析了重大行政决策程序法治化经过中存在的问题，进而提出了推动地方重大行政决策程序法治化建设的对策建议。论文分为下面几部分：第一部分是绪论，主要是文章的研究意义、国内外研究现在状况、研究方式方法等。第二部分是理论支撑及概念界定。在阐述文章理论支撑的基础上，对论文中的相关概念做了界定。第三部分是我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化现在状况。主要从重大行政决策程序的立法与执行两方面阐述。 立法方面主要基于对当前我们国家重大行政决策程序规范性法律文本的梳理；执行方面主要通过对兰州市建立城镇居民生活用水阶梯价格制度听证会的实证考察。第四部分是重大行政决策程序法治化经过中存在的问题。针对重大行政决策程序法治化现在状况，总结出了立法缺位、执法不严、公民介入决策的渠道不畅以及决策信息公开不全面，缺乏与公众的信息互动等几方面存在的问题。第五部分是推动我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化建设的对策建议。包括推进重大行政决策程序的法制体系建设、加强重大行政决策程序的法治观念、强化对重大行政决策程序的监督以及保障公众有效介入重大行政决策等几方面的建议。 本文关键词语：重大行政决策程序；法治化；地方；程序规范 ABSTRACT Enforce the law to make peace and stability of a country, lax laws make a countrybecome chaotic.Law is an important guarantee for the development of a country is thebasic way of managing state affairs. Rigorously enforce the rule of law is a universalprinciple of political and social behavior norms of modern society, and also a finaldestination of the social and political development of China. Unlike major administrativedecision-making of general administrative decision-making, because of its broad, globaland comprehensive features make it a key link in the administration, more and moreattention in the community. Increasingly expansion in the government executive powertoday, major administrative decisions facing increasingly complex decision-makingenvironment, also increases the difficulty of the decision, which the local government tomake major administrative decisions put forward higher requirements. However, In thecase of actual decision-making activities, patting his head to make decisions, boldlyexecuted decision, but decision-making is a problem that no one is responsible for thecommon. In order to achieve scientific, democratization and the rule of law ofadministrative decision-making, reduce the losses caused by wrong decisions, and ensureorderly administration of the State, there must be a sound major administrativedecision-making process as a guarantee, and let this program in the form of law finalized,only the formation of major administrative decision-making process to improve the rulesand regulations in order on this basis, according to the law to protect major administrativedecision-making, implementation of law, rule of law in order to achieve majoradministrative decision-making process. Therefore, for the local government,implementation decisions according to the law, to promote the legalization of majoradministrative decision-making process, whether it is for the Government to ensure thesuccessful completion of the work, or to create a solid basis for governmentdecision-making of public opinion, promote the rule of law or a government building has avery Significance. By combing the major administrative decision-making process on the existing laws,regulations and administrative normative documents, clear the status of majoradministrative decision-making process of the legislative level, combined with the status ofimplementation of major administrative decision-making process on major administrativedecisions of local government law program of the overall status have a more clearunderstanding. At the same time summarizes the major administrative decision-makingprocess of the legalization process problems and analyzes the reasons for this, and thenproposed to promote local major administrative decision-making process of building therule of law countermeasures. This paper is divided into the following parts: The first part isthe introduction, it is to study the significance of the article, current research, researchmethods and innovations and deficiencies. The second part is the theoretical support andrelated concepts. It describes the theoretical support of the article,and defines the majoradministrative decision-making process related to the concept of the rule of law. The thirdpart is about the status of our local government major administrative decision-makingprocess of the rule of law.Mainly from the implementation of major legislative andadministrative decision-making process both paper. Legislation is mainly based on thecurrent major administrative decision-making process of normative legal texts comb;implementation mainly through the establishment of Lanzhou urban household water priceladder system hearings empirical study combining these two aspects drawn majoradministrative of Local Government decision-making process of the overall status of therule of law. The fourth part is the major administrative decision-making process of thelegalization process problems and cause analysis. According to current situation of majoradministrative decision-making procedures under the rule of law,summed up the absenceof legislation, lax enforcement, poor decision-making information channels and citizenparticipation in public decision-making is not comprehensive, the lack of governmentinteract with information and other aspects of the public and so on, and analyzes thereasons.The fifth part is some suggestions to promote the major administrativedecision-making process under the rule of law and Legal Construction of LocalGovernment. Including the legal system to promote the construction of majoradministrative decision-making process, enhance the rule of law major administrativedecision-making process, strengthen the supervision of major administrativedecision-making process and to guarantee effective public participation in the majoradministrative decision-making and so on. Key Words:Major administrative decision-making Processes; Under the rule of law; Localgovernment; Program specification 目 录 摘 要 ABSTRACT 第一章 绪论 一、研究背景及意义 一研究背景 二研究意义 二、研究现在状况 一国外的研究现在状况 二国内的研究现在状况 三国内外研究简评 三、研究方式方法 一文献研究 二实地研究 四、研究的思路和主要内容 一研究思路 二主要内容 五、创新点与缺乏 一创新之处 二缺乏之处 第二章 理论支撑及概念界定 一、理论支撑 一程序正当原理 二有限理论 三依法治国理论 二、概念界定 一重大行政决策的概念及范围的界定 二重大行政决策程序的含义 三地方重大行政决策程序法治化概念的内涵及基本要求 四地方的内涵及其研究意义 第三章 我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化现在状况 一、立法现在状况 一规范性法律文本的梳理 二立法状况分析 二、执行现在状况 一听证会的施行大概情况 二无构造访谈 三执行状况的实证研究结论及分析 第四章 我们国家地方重大行政决策程序法治化的主要问题 一、全国没有统一的重大行政决策程序法律规范 二、地方规章及规范性法律文件效力低 三、重大行政决策程序法治观念不强 四、重大行政决策程序执行不力 五、公民介入重大行政决策的渠道不畅 六、决策信息公开不全面，缺乏与公众的信息互动 七、重大行政决策程序监督气力薄弱 第五章 推动地方重大行政决策程序法治化建设的对策建议 一、推进重大行政决策程序的法制体系建设 一强化对重大行政决策程序的理论研究 二推进重大行政决策程序专门法规的出台 二、加强重大行政决策程序的法治观念 一加强重大行政决策程序法治观念的宣传引导 二防止传统官本位思想对重大行政决策程序的影响 三、以严格执法为重点全面推进重大行政决策程序的执行 一严格保卫宪法和法律的尊严 二行政机关带头严格执法是关键 四、扩大公众介入，保障重大行政决策的民主性 一扩大听证制度的范围 二强化利益团体表示出 五、扩大重大行政决策程序信息公开程度 一推行决策信息公开，提高决策透明度 二将信息公开贯穿于重大行政决策全经过 六、强化对重大行政决策程序的监督 一加强重大行政决策程序行政机关内部监督 二加强重大行政决策程序外部监督 第六章 结束语 以下为参考文献 致 谢