雅思小作文柱图表图写作.ppt

IELTS WRITING Task1CHERYLXIAMEN NEWORIENTAL SCHOOLIELTS INTERNATIONAL LEARNING CENTRE 各种图各种写Language for comparisonsLanguage for comparisonsmore thanThere are more boys than girls in class A.Class A has fewer girls than boys.fewer thanLanguage for comparisonsthe number ofThe number of boys is larger/greater/higher than that of girls in class A.Language for comparisonsthe percentage ofThe percentage of boys is larger/greater/higher than that of girls in class A(67%and 33%,respectively).6Language for comparisonsoutnumberBoys outnumber girls in class A.exceedThe number of boys exceeds that of girls in class A.The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960,1980 and 2000.P1The bar graph shows the changing patterns in commuting by train,car,tube or bus for commuters in one European city in the years 1960,1980 and 2000.9P2The number of people using trains at first rose from just under 20%in 1960 to about 26%in 1980,but then fell back to about 23%in 2000.Use of the tube was relatively stable,falling from 27%of commuters in 1960 to 22%in 1980,but climbing back to reach 25%by 2000.P3On the other hand,the use of cars increased steadily from just over 5%in 1960 to 23%in 1980,reaching almost 40%by 2000,whereas the popularity of buses has declined since 1960,falling from just under 35%in 1960 to 27%in 1980 and only 15%in 2000.P4The graph indicates the growing use of cars for commuting to work between 1960-2000,and the continued decline in the popularity of buses from being the most popular mode of transport in 1960 to the least popular in 2000.The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960,1980 and 2000.19601980200014In 1960,bus was the most popular type of transportation mode,having 40%commuters，which was followed by tube,train and car at 27%,18%and 6%respectively.Twenty years later,the biggest percentage went to train at 28%.Interestingly,people use car and tube shared the same proportion(about 22 percent).At the end of 21st century,car became the most popular choice,which meant 37%people would catch a cab when they chose to work from work.15nThe charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.nThe first graph shows that there is a gradual decrease in study for career reasons with age.Nearly 80%of students under 26 years,study for their career.This percentage gradually declines by 10-20%every decade.Only 40%of 40-49yr olds and 18%of over 49yr olds studying for career reasons in late adulthood.Conversely,the first graph also shows that study stemming from interest increases with age.There are only 10%of under 26yr olds studying out of interest.The percentage increases slowly till the beginning of the fourth decade,and increases dramatically in late adulthood.Nearly same number of 40-49yr olds study for career and interest.However 70%of over 49yr olds study for interest in comparison to 18%studying for career reasons in that age group.The second graph shows that employer support is maximum(approximately 60%)for the under 26yr students.It drops rapidly to 32%up to the third decade of life,and then increases in late adulthood up to about 44%.It is unclear whether employer support is only for career-focused study,but the highest level is for those students who mainly study for career purposes.17nThe chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.nThe graph shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 users,for selected countries.Overall,most of the countries included in the graph have more mobile phones subscribers than landlines.Most European countries have high mobile phone use.The biggest users of mobile phones are the Italians,with 88 cell phones per 100 people.For example,Italy has twice as many mobile phones as landlines,with 88 mobiles per hundred people compared to 45 for landlines.Mobile phone use is low in Canada,with fewer than 40 phones per 100 people.Denmark is also unusual because it has slightly more landlines than mobile phones.However,in some countries,the number of landlines is higher than the number of mobile phones.One example is the USA,where the number of mobiles,at 50 per 100 people,is much lower than the number of landlines,at almost 70 per hundred.A similar pattern can be seen in Canada.The highest number of landlines in the graph is in Denmark,with about 90 per 100 people.In contrast,the lowest figures for fixed lines are in Italy and the UK.In conclusion,it seems that mobile phone use is higher in Europe than in North America.nThe chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.nThe chart shows that Britain,among the four European countries listed,has spent most heavily on the range of consumer goods included.In every case,British spending is considerably higher than that of other countries;only in the case of tennis racquets does another country,Italy,come close.In contrast,Germany is generally the lowest spender.This Is most evident in photographic film,where Germany spends much less than Britain.Germany only spends more than another country,France,in two cases;tennis racquets and perfumes.Meanwhile,France and Italy generally maintain middle positions,averaging approximately similar spending overall.Specifically,France spends more on CDs and photographic film but less on tennis racquets than Italy does.Italys spending on personal stereos is only marginally greater than that of France,while spending on toys is equal between the two.It is clear from the data given that there are some significant differences in spending habits within Europe.nThe table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.nThe chart shows CO2 emissions per passenger kilometre for various methods of transport in the European Union while the pie chart shows European Union spending on transport.Flying by air produces by far the greatest CO2 emissions,approximately three times as much as passenger cars which are the next largest producers.Very little is spent by the EU on air travel while roads make up more than half of the EU transport budget.Trains produce about three times less CO2 emissions per passenger kilometre than passenger cars and eight times less than air travel.Nearly a third of EU transport funds are spent on railways.Ships are a clean form of transport and produce about the same amount of CO2 per passenger kilometre as trains do.However,only 2 percent of EU funds are spent on ports.A further one percent is spent on inland waterways.Coaches are the cleanest form of transport.Emissions of CO2 per passenger kilometre from coaches are half those of buses.Buses emit less than half as much CO2 per passenger kilometre as cars.The European Union spends 10 percent of its transport budget on public transport,such as buses and coaches.n(197 words)nThe charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australian share of the Japanese tourist market.nThis chart shows us that Japanese tourists go abroad for travelling in a decade and Australians share of marketing for Japanese tourists.Between 1985 and 1995 Japanese tourists travelling abroad was dramatically increased.In 85 there was about 5 millions traveler go abroad.Since 85 number of traveler went up dramatically until 40.It was almost twice then between 90 and 93 the number remain stable,which is about 12 millions.From 93 to 95 it rose slightly.Therefore in 1995 there were about 15 million people went abroad.I am going to write about the other chart,which is Australians share of Japanese tourist market.This is also between 1985 and 1995.About 2 million Japanese tourists went to Australia in 1985.Between 85 and 89 people went there increased sharply,which is almost 3 times more.In 1990 it fall number slightly but from 90 to 94 number is went up.However 94 to 95 is not so went up number of people who went to Australia.It remain is the same or slightly decreased.nThe chart below shows information about Heart Attacks by Age and Gender in USA.nThe graph shows how age and gender influence the frequency of heart attacks in the US.Less than 6%of all heart attacks occur in the 29-44 age group.The number of women who suffer heart attacks in this group is negligible-only 3000 per year,compared to 123,000 men.However the proportion of men and women with heart attacks rises dramatically between 45 and 64,with over half a million per year.Over 420,000 men a year in this age group have heart attacks.The incidence amongst women increases-women have one heart attack for every three men in this age group.Over the age of 65,the number of men suffering heart attacks only increases slightly.However there is a huge increase in the number of women with heart attacks-they comprise over 40%of all victims.In conclusion,men are more likely to be the victims of heart attacks at all ages,but women are increasingly likely over the age of 65.nThe graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.nThe graph shows Oil Production Capacity in millions of barrels per day for selected Gulf countries.There are several features in this graph.The most significant feature is that oil production will increase sharply in almost all the countries shown.Kuwait and Iraq are both expected to double their output between 1990 and 2010,with Kuwaits production rising from 1.8 million barrels per day(bpd)in 1990 to 3.8 in 2010.Iran will also increase its output by a slightly smaller amount.After remaining steady at 2.5 million bpd from 1990 to 2000,the UAEs output is expected to approach 4.0 million bpd in 2010.Only Qatars production is predicted to fall,back to 0.8 million bpd after a slight rise in 2000.However,the greatest increase will be from Saudi Arabia.In 1990,its output capacity at 8.5 million bpd exceeded the combined production of Iran,Iraq and Kuwait.This lead is expected to continue with a 75%increase in production to 14.5 million bpd 2010.In summary,while most of the countries are expected to show increases,Saudi Arabia will maintain and strengthen its position as the major producer.n审题审题观察横轴与纵轴代表什么及各自的单位或项目。横轴代表职位的高低：从最低的观察横轴与纵轴代表什么及各自的单位或项目。横轴代表职位的高低：从最低的office grade E到最高的到最高的office grade A，纵轴代表男女员工所占的百分比：，纵轴代表男女员工所占的百分比：0%-100%；n观察横轴有几种柱形，每种代表什么。此图里，共两种柱形：浅色柱表示女员工的比例，深色柱代表男员工的比例；观察横轴有几种柱形，每种代表什么。此图里，共两种柱形：浅色柱表示女员工的比例，深色柱代表男员工的比例；n观察每种柱形的升降趋势及最高点，最低点和柱形间的高低差异。在这幅图里，浅色柱随职位的升高而呈现下降趋势，；观察每种柱形的升降趋势及最高点，最低点和柱形间的高低差异。在这幅图里，浅色柱随职位的升高而呈现下降趋势，；相反，深色柱随职位的升高而呈现上升趋势；在相反，深色柱随职位的升高而呈现上升趋势；在office grade E里，浅色柱达最高点里，浅色柱达最高点(约为约为72%)，而深色柱却为最低点，而深色柱却为最低点(约为约为28%)；与此形成对比的是，在；与此形成对比的是，在office grade A这里，浅色柱到达最低点这里，浅色柱到达最低点(8%左右左右)，而深色柱却位于最高点，而深色柱却位于最高点(92%左左右右)，深浅色柱差别最大的地方在，深浅色柱差别最大的地方在office grade A,为为84%；深浅色柱差别最小的地方在；深浅色柱差别最小的地方在officer grade C,为为10%。n构思有了详细的审题分析，随后的构思阶段就变得轻而易举了。构思意味着对文章结构的妥善安排，由于引言段是必不构思有了详细的审题分析，随后的构思阶段就变得轻而易举了。构思意味着对文章结构的妥善安排，由于引言段是必不可少的，并且只有一两句话，因此构思的对象主要就是针对主体段落。以此图为例，主体段落的安排可以有两种方案。可少的，并且只有一两句话，因此构思的对象主要就是针对主体段落。以此图为例，主体段落的安排可以有两种方案。n按按office grade的高低逐级描述，从的高低逐级描述，从office grade E到到office grade A，共分成，共分成5小段；按照规律，如果按男女比例差距小段；按照规律，如果按男女比例差距的数量大小，可把的数量大小，可把B和和E放一起，放一起，C和和D放一起，放一起，A单独写一段，也就是单独写一段，也就是3小段；按数据差异性质，比如小段；按数据差异性质，比如E和和D都是男少女都是男少女多，多，B和和C都是女少男多，都是女少男多，A单独一段，也就是单独一段，也就是3小段了。小段了。n按浅色柱和深色柱来分别进行描述，共分两大段，每段中按浅色柱和深色柱来分别进行描述，共分两大段，每段中office grade相互比较。但由于女员工比例随级别升高而下降，相互比较。但由于女员工比例随级别升高而下降，男员工比例却随级别升高而增加的形式极其明显，因此方案二的写作余地小，应优先选择方案一。男员工比例却随级别升高而增加的形式极其明显，因此方案二的写作余地小，应优先选择方案一。n引言段必须要写，但结尾段则没有强制要求。若要写结尾段，则应以简单的总体趋势描写为主。引言段必须要写，但结尾段则没有强制要求。若要写结尾段，则应以简单的总体趋势描写为主。n选词由于是纵向比较，故可选用的方法大致如下：选词由于是纵向比较，故可选用的方法大致如下：twice as much as(倍数比较倍数比较)；the highest,followed by.(排序排序)；(figure),making.the lowest one in.(数值及排位数值及排位)；a third as much as(分数比较分数比较)。分数和。分数和倍数的表达还有很多，考生们可在备考中总结。倍数的表达还有很多，考生们可在备考中总结。n考点除了开头讲过的信息精确度以及趋势和数字相结合的要求外，对于合理的衔接及复杂句的应用也是有要求的。考点除了开头讲过的信息精确度以及趋势和数字相结合的要求外，对于合理的衔接及复杂句的应用也是有要求的。衔接方法的切入点除了有我们熟知的连词外，还有定语从句衔接方法的切入点除了有我们熟知的连词外，还有定语从句(包括介词包括介词+关系代词关系代词)，分词，状语提前以及独立主格等方，分词，状语提前以及独立主格等方法。成功的复杂句数量不需多要精，一两句即可。法。成功的复杂句数量不需多要精，一两句即可。nThe chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000.nIn this report I will describe a bar chart that shows the estimated world illiteracy rates by gender and region for the year 2000.First I will look at male illiteracy for the 6 areas shown.The lowest rates were in Developed Countries,Latin America/Caribbean and East Asia/Oceania with rates of 1%(approximately),10%and 8%(approximately)respectively.The rates for the next three areas were much higher and quite similar to each other.Sub-Saharan Africa,the Arab States and South Asia had rates of approximately 31%,29%and 34%.Female illiteracy was much higher relatively in each area except Latin America/Caribbean where it was only slightly higher.The lowest rates for female illiteracy were again Developed Countries,Latin America/Caribbean and East Asia/Oceania with rates of approximately 2%,12%and 20%.Again the rates for the next three areas were much higher and quite similar to each other.Sub-Saharan Africa,the Arab States and South Asia had rates of approximately 48%,52%and 56%.(168 words)nThe graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999.nThe charts shows student enrolment by gender and level in different colleges of the Higher Colleges of Technology colleges in the UAE.There are clear differences in male and female enrolment.Females outnumber men in all the colleges,with almost 25%more students in Dubai Womens college than in Dubai Mens.Ras Al-Khaimah Womens College has almost 180 students,compared to only 100 in the Mens college.Females also outnumber males by level,with almost double the number of men at Higher Diploma level(330 compared to 181).Only at Diploma level does the number of men slightly exceed that of women.Over half the students are in Certificate level,with less than a quarter at Higher Diploma or Bachelor level.In conclusion,most students in the Higher Colleges are enrolled at Diploma level or below,and the majority of students are women.(143 words)nThe table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.nThe table shows that the figures for imprisonment in the five countries mentioned indicate no overall pattern of increase or decrease.In fact there is considerable fluctuation from country to country.In Great Britain the numbers in prison have increased steadily from 30 000 in 1930 to 80,000 in 1980.On the other hand in Australia,and particularly in New Zealand the numbers fell markedly from 1930 to 1940.Since then they have increased gradually,apart from in 1980 when the numbers in prison in New Zealand fell by about 30,000 from the 1970 total.Canada is the only country in which the numbers in prison have decreased over the period 1930 to 1980,although there have bee