GRE写作：高分冲刺.docx

GRE写作：高分冲刺 gre写作如何高分冲刺?今日我给大家带来GRE写作：高分冲刺，希望能够帮助到大家，下面我就和大家共享，来观赏一下吧。 GRE写作：高分冲刺 1.要有可以仿照的文章(最好是带有说理性的文章)。 2.你要理解这个文章，理解它的用词、句子结构、段落结构。 3.这些文章都有正确的中文翻译。同时，文章的长度不能超过500字。 怎么仿照，首先要分析文章，分析每一句和上一句是什么关系。我给大家举个例子：美国人写作文的一个特点是，通常每段的第一句都包含了整段文字的内容，也就是我们常说的topic sentence.。另一个特点是当你写完一个句子后，你要问WHY。你提出一个问题，然后给出一个圆满的回答，这就是一篇优秀的作文。 详细化的实力 详细化并不代表要写一个完整的故事。但是任何一篇文章都要给人一个详细的意向。通过详细的东西来描述才能给人踏实的感觉。详细化只要举出几个地方、几个名字、几件小事就可以了。 为什么好多同学作文中分数很低呢，就是因为他提出了问题却没有回答。 你通过不断地仿照写作，就可以不断地订正语法和词组错误。如何把抽象和详细结合起来是一个重点，如何在一个段落中只表达一个思想，这是另一个重点。美国人的判分特点是，假如你在一段中表达了一个以上的思想，那你的分数就不会高了。 分析完一篇文章后，怎么仿照着写呢?就是看着中文的翻译，把上面的英文一字不落的写下来，当你实在想不起来的时候，再看原文。等到写完之后，和原文比照一下，看看是谁写得美丽。我刚刚起先仿照写作的时候发觉，仿照了几天后，写作水平的确提高了。 因为依据记忆学原则，这个单词你背过、读过，它都不能写在你的文章中间。假如一个单词可以常常出现在你的脑子和文章中间，那这只证明白一件事，就是你写过这个字。但是你自己写作你不行能用到这个字，那就只有一个可能，就是你在仿照文章时写过这个字。假如一个结构别人写不出来，你能写出来，那你的分数就会高。 通过不断地仿照你的几大实力就会得到提高： 1.你的语法错误会越来越少; 2.句子结构实力越来越强; 3.用词实力大大增加。 GRE写作满分范文赏析 SixmonthsagotheregionofForestvilleincreasedthespeedlimitforvehiclestravelingontheregion'shighwaysbytenmilesperhour.Sincethatchangetookeffect,thenumberofautomobileaccidentsinthatregionhasincreasedby15percent.ButthespeedlimitinElmsford,aregionneighboringForestville,remainedunchanged,andautomobileaccidentsdeclinedslightlyduringthesamesix-monthperiod.Therefore,ifthecitizensofForestvillewanttoreducethenumberofautomobileaccidentsontheregion'shighways,theyshouldcampaigntoreduceForestville'sspeedlimittowhatitwasbeforetheincrease. Thisargumentdoesnothaveanyconcreteinformation.ItseemsbyForestville,increasingtheirspeedlimitmoreaccidentsoccured.Weallknowthataccidentsoccurreguardlessofwhatthespeedlimitofthehighwaywetravel.Fortunately,Elmsford'saccidentsdecreasedduringthesix-monthsindiscussion.Thiscouldbebecauseofgoodweather,carefuldrivers,oranynumberofsituations.Ontheotherhand,Forrestvillehadanincreaseinaccidents.Theonlydeterminingfactorgivenwasthespeedlimitincreasing.Thisinfactprobablydidplayabigroleinwhytherewasa15%percentincreaseintheaccidents,butmaynotbetheonlyfactor.Inordertomakeanaccuratejudgementonwhytherewasanincreaseinautomobileaccidentsthesituationneedstoberesearched.Solidfactsneedtobestated.Clearly,toreducethespeedlimitbacktonormalinForrestvillewouldnoteliminatetheproblem.Comments: Thislimitedcritiqueisplainlyflawed.Theauthorbeginswithacriticismaboutthelackof"concreteinformation"butthenfailstoprovideanyconcreteanalysisintheresponse.ThewritercitesthedropinElmsford'saccidentsbutdoesnotdevelopanyofthereasonsmentionedtoaccountforthedrop:"goodweather,carefuldrivers,oranynumberofsituations." ThewriterthengoesontodiscussForestvilleandsuggeststhatthespeedlimit"maynotbetheonlyfactor,"butthispointisnotdevelopedeither.Theauthorissuesagenericcallformoreresearchandfactsandoffersanunsupportedconclusionofhisorherown:"Clearly,toreducethespeedlimit? wouldnoteliminatetheproblem."Althoughtheauthorappearstoknowthatthereissomethingwrongwiththeargument,heorshedoesnotseemtoknowhowtocritiquetheargumentingreaterdetail. Theresponsedemonstratesadequatecontroloftheelementsofwriting,buttheanalysisissounderdevelopedthatitcannotearnascorehigherthan3. GRE写作满分范文赏析 SixmonthsagotheregionofForestvilleincreasedthespeedlimitforvehiclestravelingontheregion'shighwaysbytenmilesperhour.Sincethatchangetookeffect,thenumberofautomobileaccidentsinthatregionhasincreasedby15percent.ButthespeedlimitinElmsford,aregionneighboringForestville,remainedunchanged,andautomobileaccidentsdeclinedslightlyduringthesamesix-monthperiod.Therefore,ifthecitizensofForestvillewanttoreducethenumberofautomobileaccidentsontheregion'shighways,theyshouldcampaigntoreduceForestville'sspeedlimittowhatitwasbeforetheincrease. Atfirstlook,thisseemstobeaverywellpresentedarguement.Alogicalpathisfollowedthroughouttheparagraphandtheconclusionisexpected.However,uponasecondconsideration,itisapparentthatallpossibilitieswerenotconsideredwhentheauthorpresentedhisconclusion(oratleastthats/hedidnotpresentallofthepossibilities).TherearenumerouspotentialexplanationsforwhythenumberofaccidentsinElmsforddecreasedwhilethenumberinForestvilleincreased.Althoughitseemslogicaltoassumethatthedifferenceinthepercentageofaccidentswasduetothedifferenceinwhetherornotthespeedlimithadbeenincreasedduringthespecifiedmonth,thisdoesnotnecessarilymeanthatthespeedlimitshouldbereducedbacktowhatitoriginallywasinForestville.Theauthordoesnotstatetwospecificpiecesofinformationthatareimportantbeforeaconclusionsuchastheonetheauthormadeissound.ThefirstisthatitisnotexpressedwhetherthespeedlimitsinthetwoneighboringregionshadhadthesamespeedlimitbeforeForestville'sspeedlimithadbeenincreased.Iftheyhadoriginallybeenthesame,thenitisreasonabletoconcludethatForestville'sspeedlimitshouldbereducedbacktowhatitwasbeforetheincrease.However,ifthetworegion'sspeedlimitswereinitiallydifferent,thensuchaconclusioncannotbemade.Thesecondpieceofinformationthatisnecessaryforthepresentargumentistherelativenumberofaccidentsineachoftheareaspriortotheincreaseinspeedlimit.Fortheauthortomakethepresentedconclusion,thenumberofaccidentsshouldhavebeenapproximatelyequalpriortotheincreaseinthespeedlimitinForestville.Ifthetwomissingpiecesofinformationhadbeenpresentedandwereintheauthor'sfavor,thentheconclusionthattheauthormadewouldhavebeenmuchmoresoundthanitcurrentlyis.Inconclusion,theargumentisnotentirelywellreasoned,butgiventheinformationthatwasexpressedintheparagraph,itwaspresentedwell,andinalogicalorder.Comments: Thiscompetentcritiqueclaimsthatthereare"numerouspotentialexplanationsforwhythenumberofaccidentsinElmsforddecreasedwhilethenumberinForestvilleincreased."However,theauthor discussesonlytwopoints: -whetherthespeedlimitsinthetworegionswereoriginallythesame;and -thenumberofaccidentsineachregionpriortoForestville'sraisingthespeedlimit. Althoughtheresponseappearsatfirsttobewelldeveloped,thereismuchlessanalysisherethanthelengthwouldsuggest.Thefirstthirdandlastthirdoftheessayarerelativelyinsubstantial,consistingmainlyofgeneralsummarystatements(e.g.,"Alogicalpath?conclusionisexpected"and"Ifthetwo?moresoundthanitcurrentlyis").Therealheartofthecritiqueconsistsofminimaldevelopmentofthetwopointsmentionedabove.Therefore,althoughtwoimportantfeaturesoftheargumentareanalyzedandthewriterhandleslanguageandsyntaxadequately,thelackofsubstantialdevelopmentkeepsthiscritiquefromearningascorehigherthan4. GRE写作：高分冲刺本文来源：网络收集与整理，如有侵权，请联系作者删除，谢谢！第11页 共11页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页第 11 页 共 11 页