2023年MBA联考英语作文练习.pdf

ggC u 1 t ure i n vas i on o r co-op e r ationWh e n Disne y Company c laim e d that th e y w i 1 1 b uil d the si x t h Disney t h eme p ark in S h ang h ai,the r e spring up a w i d e v a r iety o f voices amon g g e n e r alpublic.Based u pon“g 1 o be ne w spa p e r“s urvey,abou t 56%of peo p 1 e consid e r th a t i t w i 1 1 br i n g ab o ut a lot of serious e c onomical problems.M e anwhi 1 e,th e y al s o r e g ard it as a cu 1 t u r e in v a sion,e ven as cu 1 t u re crushe r.There are s ome possib 1 e rea s ons fo r this voic e.On the top o f li s t,s o me peop le r eg a rd t he cul t u r e i n vasi o n a s a countr y s conqu e ring a n o t h e ro n e thr o ugh cu 1 ture t r an s form in pea c e time.Whats mo r e,it is often r eflec t e dthat the develope d c ountr y t r y to c o n tr o l d e v eloping c o u n trys c u Iture marke tan d cu s t om s.Last b u t o n t he le a st,som e p e o p 1 e think t h at it is h ar m f ul t o C h i n ese c om p anies,b e c a us e w e use o ur 1 an d r e s o urce t oser v er Amer i c a n c o mpani e s.S o far as I am concer n ed,in our a g einformat i on t i mes,c u It u re c ommuni cat i on has be c o me an e s se n t i a l composition of in t ern a tional co-ope r ation.Itis u n r e a sonable tha t we p rote c t o u r c ult u re i n the wa y of d e f e n d i n go t her c ul t ure.T h e r e fore,I draw my c o n c 1 usion tha t vari o us c ulture c o mmunic a t ion s w i l l prompt th e deve 1 o p m e nt of society.In a word,w e shouldregard it as a n orm a 1 internati o nal c o-ope r ati o n bet w e e n C hinese a n d American.ogTheex p osuredrun k dr i v e r to s o c ietyNo w ad a y s,N anji n g gover n ment exposed 10 6 dr u nk dr i vers to soc i et y.Wh e ngovernment claim e d that it will c o n tinue for a while,ther e s p run g u p a w id e vari e t y of v oices am o n g general p u b 1 ic.S o me peop 1 e w h o ob j ect it m a y a rgue t h a t t he p r act i c e n o t o n ly inv a d e s d r ive r s,privacy,bu t a 1 so affects d r iv e rs9 1 i fe.The y oft en say,it i s t o o s t r i ct that drun k d r i ver s are ex p osed t o t he soc i e t yafter b e in g p u n ish e d.While o t h e r p eop 1 e su c h a s p olic e men c onsider th at the pract i ce of e x posure wa r n d r u nk dr i ver s a g a i n s t the next time theywant to do i t ag a in and i t made o the r d r iver s who never driv e a f t e r d ri nking,and it will deduce t h e occurr i n g opp o r tu n ity o f traffic accid e nee.S o far as I a m concerned,I am i ncline d to support t h e la t e r voi c e.It iso f no diffic u It f o r me to p u t f o rwar d some a r g um e nts t o i 1 1 u s tra t e m y sta nd p o in t.For one t h i n g,drunk d r iv e r is harm f ul to ou r s ociety,based upon rec e nt o f f ic i a I surv e y,about 32%o f t r affic a cci d e nc e s b e cause d byd r unk d r ivers.D r inki n g h a s b e e o m e o n e of the m a jo r t r a f ficaccidence s reason s.Fo r a no t her,th e p u nishmen t i s not r e ally strictness,t h u swe wou 1 d imp r o v e the m e asure of prevention.In a wor d,t he e x posure i s not s t r i c tne s s.Needles s t o say,it w i 1 1 bean a c tive ro 1 e of pr e ventio n drun k d r ive.F.S p o rts s tars sh o u Id n o t earn high s a 1 ari e s.Agree o r di s agree?These d a y s,由 ere a re a n in c re a sing hot topi c among g en e ral p u blic w hichconcerns t h e p henomenon th a t sports stars e a rn h i gh s a 1 a ries.W henever it come s t o this iss u e,t h ere wi 1 1 spri n g up a wi d e variety of v o ices.Som e p e o pie c o nsider it as a no r ma 1 p h en o me n o n.Wh i 1 e s t i l l some othe r s co n side r i t i s not suit a ble or a c c eptable f or a d e v el o p i ng c o untry,lik e C h ina.T hey o f ten say,t he spo r t s stars h old t he lev e 1 of r es ponsibil i t y 1 e ss t h a n the top o f scien t i s t,b ut t he sc i ent i st s sala r i e scan n ot comp a re w i t h th e s por t s stars).S o f ar a s I am cone e m e d,I am incl i ned to sup p ort the form e r voic e.I t is of no d ifficult f o r me to p u t f orward some arg u ment s to illustr a te my standpoint.F o r one thing,s ports stars ar e e ssentia 1 com p o s itio n of cul t u r e mar k e t,andt h ey a re the d riv i n g force of s ports market de v elo p m e nt.Due to tha n k s to the sp o rts st a rs,t he c om p any whic h t he spo r ts stars belong t o c o ul d e a rn a lo t o f money,a nd it made a 1 ot o f peo p le e a rn living from tha t.For an o th e r,s ports stars p 1 a y an a c tive r ol e in soci a I c ulture,young p eo p le domore p h y si c al t r aining bee a u s e they w a n t sim i 1 a r to th e sports s ta r s.The r e is no d e n yin g fa c t that the p e o p le will have diverse views o n this issue,b u t m y stan d point i s c l e a r a n d w e l l f o u nde d in th e f or e going discuss i o n.There f ore,I beli e ve,t h e s p o r t s s t a rs sh o u 1 d e a rn high sal a ri es.The c auses and s olutions of gener a t i on g a pA s we can see fr o m the s i tuation,t h e gener a tion g a p ha s become a c o mmo n p henomen o n.T h e par e nts c o nsi d er that t heir c h ildren a r e ou t of control and t hey dis 1 i k e what the i r c h ildren th i n k and d o.On th e o t her s ide,the children often compla i n t h eir p arents misu n ders t a n d a b out t h em,t h ey thin k they h av e be c ome the i r parents g oods rath e r t h a n indiv i dual p erson.The r e are s om e possible reaso n s fo r t his ph e nome n on.For one thi n g,the majo r r e ason is t h e 1 a ck of communi c at i on b e t w een pa r en t s and c h i 1 d ren.T h e c h ild r e n w a nt to indep e nden t,b ut t h e p a rent s th i nk th e ir chi1 dren c an not r e a lize good or bad.For a n o t her,the e n v i r onmen t wh i ch th ep a r ents live d i s differe n t fr o m t heir c hildrens.T h e refore,t h e y often h o Id differe n t o pi n io n s on various p r o b lems.Accordin g t o my u nderstandi n g,t he way of so 1 ut i o n i s th e effe c ti v e c ommun i c a t ion be t we e n p aren t s and c h i 1 dre n.T h ey shou 1 d h a ve an op en ta 1 k and t ell each o t h er what the y t hink abo u t the c ert a in prob 1 e ms.The parents should tell t h eir chil d r e n w h a t s h o u Id b e done whe n they want t o in depend e n t,a n d th e ch i Idren sh o ul d tel 1 their parents what t he y re a 1 1 y w an t.In a w o r d,t he communicatio n m a y r e s u 1 t i n b e t te r r e lationsh i pbet w e e n ch i 1 d re n and p ar e nts.TV a l i en a t e s fami l i e s,relationship s.A g ree o r d i s agr e e?A s TV st a t i o n p 1 ay mo r e and m o re program s,pe o p le s p end mor e andmo r e time in the f r o nt of TV.Th e refor e,som e people think t h at TV a 1 i enatesfam i lies relationship.They o ft e n say,pe o pie s p e nd m o re tim e on watc h ingTV,th e t i m e wh i ch family members us e d to t a Ik or p lay.It w as tru e?A ccordi n g t o my u nde r s t andin g,only o u r s e l f c a n a f feet the famil y s r ela t ions h i p r a ther than a n y thi n g,sue h a s TV.Ju s t 1 i k e oth e rs,1 1 i k ewatch i n g TV a n d sp e n d a 1 o t o f time in f r o n t T V,but my f amil y s re1 ati o n ship have n o t b e en affect e d.T h e r e ar e some r ea s o n s for my view.For one thin g,d ue to th a n k s toT V,our fami 1 y s m em b e rs s t a y to g e t h er for a Ion g tim e in ev e r y n igh t.For a n o the r,when ou r family members wat c h T V,wed l i k e to talk abou t t h e content o f program.T h ere f ore,t h e r e 1 a ti o nship b e tw e en us has bee n st r engt h ene d.On the contrar y,i nstead o f T V,the m a t t e rof th a t one p er s on c a n not t o 1 e rate o thers i s t h e one of majo r r e asons of 1e ss t ied.Ther e fo r e,my standpoint is clea r and w e 1 1 fo u nded in t h e forgo i ng dis c u ssion.TV c a n no t a liena t e fam i lies relat i o nship.Th e caus e s and c o n s e que nces o f urb a n i z at i onAs w e c a n s e e f r o m t h is si t uati o n,u rbanization ha s b e c o me acomm o n so c ial ph e nome n on.Why s o many p eople came i nto city?T h ere a re s o me possib 1 e reas o n s fb r th i s phen omenon.Foro n e t hing,i n th e c ity peo p le c a n rec e i v e b e t t e r edu c a t i o n,hav e mor e j o b op portuni t ies,and e njoy more co n venie n ce en t ertainmen t li k e shopping mar k et and tra n s p lant.For anoth e r,w i t h t h e development of economy,the scale o f city is en largin g,ther e f or e,t h e farmers w h o a re r e si d ent i n th e ne a r b y o fcity h a d lost t h eir lan d a n d s tre a m into city.As a result,thi s s i tu a tion 1 eads v ariou s s oci a 1 p rob 1 ems.We o f te n sa y,the pri c e o f hou s e is h i g h e r a n d g r o w in g fa st e r t h a n b e f or e.Meanw h ile,it als o br i ngs a lot o f environme n t probl e m s.A s more andm o re peopl e c ame into c i ty,the c i ty can not su p ply so muc h j o b o p p o r t unit i es,th e re are more unemplo y e d t h a n b efore,thus,t h e r ate o f crim e hasi n c re a sed.N eedless to say,the development 1 eads to many s e vere p roblems.The k e y is whatw e sho u Id d o bef o r e t h e s ituat i on get worse.The adv a n tages and di s ad v antag e s of in t e rnati o nal tou r i s mAs t h e rap i d dev e lopme n t o f C h i n e s e e c o nomy,mo r e a n d more p e op 1 espend m o n e y on i n t er n at i o nal tourism.Meanwhil e,it rec e iv e d much public a tt e ntion.Pe o p 1 es5 a t t i t u des towa r d it v ary grea t ly.S o me pe o p 1 e r egar d i t a s unsuita b 1 e fo r d ev e lop i ng co u nt r y,like C h in a.T h ey o ften s a y,th e mon e y s h o u 1 d be used t o d evelop our c o u n try eco nomy rather tha n oth e rs We should take m o re i n tern a 1 tour i sm th u s themoney ca n not lose t o other cou n t r ies.Som e others view i t as a n o rmal phen o me no n.As f a r a s I am conce r ne d,I am in c lined to sup port t he 1 a te r v o i c e.Theint e r n ational t o uri s m plays ap o s i tiv e r o 1 e in ou r s oc i et y.At thetop of 1 is t,n o t o nly the i n t er nati o nal touri sm pr o motes the exchange of information and techno l o g y,b u t i t cr e ate s a lo t o f jo b o pp o r t un i tiesas well.Whats m o re,t h e interna t i o n a 1 t ourism i s o u r d r i ving for c eof work i ng h a r der.Las t b u t not lea s t,the i nte r nationa 1 tour i sm is away o f i nter n ati o nal c ommunicat i o n,it is po s itive t o t h e c u 1 t ure divers ity and wo r Id p ea c e.I n a word,the in t ernational touri s m shou 1 d b e e nc o ur a ged ra t he r than di s co urag e d or e ven ba n ned.Th e a d vanta g es an d di s advanta g es of job-h o p p i ngAs we can see from this s i t u a tion,j ob-hoppi n g has b e c om e a c ommon p henome non a m o n g g r a d u a t e s.A c cording to n e wspa p ers survey,a bout 3 4%o fgraduat e s h a v e c h a nge d their jo b i n t he f i rst t hre e years of their employment.Someof t hem had made even sev e r a I changes.W i th re g a rd t o thi s ph e nom e non,p e o pie var y gr e atly in thei r viewpoint.Somea rgue t h a t i t is normal a nd a c c e pta b Ie t o c han g e j o b.T h e y a ls o h o ld t h a t job-hopp i n g can bring hig h e r inco me a nd better w orking en v i r o nm e nt.However,the re a r e o th e r p eop 1 e w ho Io o k a t this phenome n o n in a not h e r wa y.F o r them,job-hopping c an create an i n sec u r e c o n d it i o n.Bes i d e s,if one ch a ng e s their job f req uent 1 y,one c a n not b u i Id a sound b asis f o r hisca r eer.As c o in as tw o s i d e s,it i s n o exception to th e ph e n o me n on o f job-h o p p ing.A s f a r as I a m conce r ne d,jo b-ho p p i n g sh o u 1 d be e nc o u raged in our country.C o ope r atio n i s m o re imp o r tant than b e fo r e.A g ree or d i s a gree?Wh e n e v er it come s to th e imp o rtant of c o o perati o n,pe o pies attitude t oward t ha tvary g reatly.Som e peo p Ie often say that in our times th e c o m p et i ti o n is m o re import ant t h a n cooperation,t h us,the c o op e r at i on is 1 e ss important th a n b e fore.H o we ve r,som e oth e rs consi d e r th a tc o o p e r a tion i s an i mportan t w a y t o p r o c e s s in gsome t hing.A s f a r as I am conce r n ed,I am i nclined t o suppo r t t he 1 ater v i ew.It i s of no difficul t y f or me to put f o rward some arg u m ent s t o 川 u s t rate my stand p o i nt.For o nethi n g,as t h e ra p id development of econom y,we c onfront mor e and more thi ngs tha n be f o re.11 need cooperation to p r oce s s in g,o th e rwi s e,w e c a n not f i n i s he v e ry thing on t ime.For anothe r,a s there a r e more f r eq u e n t c o mmun i c a tions among g e n eral pub 1 ic,t h e r e lat i ons h ip am o ng p eoples i s ti g hter t h a n befor e.Cooperati o n c a n bui 1 d tr u s t b e t ween e ach othe r and help to b ring I o n g-termr e la t ionsh i p.I n a w ord,I d raw m y concl u s i o n tha t cooper a t io n is more impo rtant th a n b e fo r e.保 持 健 康 的 重 要 性;保 持 健 康 的 方 法；保 持 健 康 的 结 论 As the rap i d d evelo p men t o f e co nomy an d t he stead y improvem e n t of 1 ivingstandard,m o r e and mo r e p e ople t ake their att e nti o ns to h e a lt h.The im p ortant o fhealth rece i ved more a tten t ion tha n before.Why does it t a ke p 1 ac e?We of t e n s a y,o n e per s on can n ot do anythi n g unless he o r s h e has a healthy body.Thati s the i mpo r tan t o f h e a l t h.Health means th a t o n e p e rson canenjoy lit e,an d c an wo r k be t ter.0 n the co n trary,n ot onl y we w o u Id sp e nd a I o t of money b u t al s o we would suf f er th e pa i n f u 1 ne s s i f we ar e si c k.How can we k e ep he a 11 h?T h e o n e o f major ways is p h y si c a I trai n ing.P h ysi c altrainin g c a n h elp u s t o d e fend t h e viruse s i n v asion a n d keep he a Ith.0 the rways includ e the g o od cu s tom of life,no smoking,e atin g v e getab les an d s o on.The r efo r e,I draw m y cone 1 usion that the heal th c an m ak e y ou f e el be t te r,sav eyour m o n e y a nd t i m e.B u t i t i s be sup p orted by goo d measur e s of k eep i n g h eal t h.M y de f initio n o f fr i ends h ipWhen e v er it comes to fri e ndship,p e r sons have va r ious opinions on t h i s t o p ic.S o me peo p le r e g ar d i t ju s t as on e k ind of i nterperso n a 1 r elat i ons h i p,su c h a s re 1 atio n shi p am o ng colleagues.As far as I a m c o nee r ned,I think fr i e n d s hip i s d i fferent fr o m i n t e rpersonalre 1 a ti o nship,it is deeper t h a n that.It ha s t h ree char a ct e r s.The first,it i ssatis f ac t i on.When f r i e n d s gra i n to g et h er,ea c h of t h em should fee 1 satis f a c t i on.Ever y on e can t a 1 k a b out anythin g they want t o tai k.Wha t smore,the second char a cter is car i n g con c e r ned.Fr i ends care fb r each o t her.I n that,t he friends ea c h care a b o u t o th e rs,and do so fo r others sake.Thet h ird c ha r acter is t r us t in e s s.One person c a n t el 1 s om e t hing he or h e rwou 1 d n