《国王的演讲》英文观后感.docx

国王的演讲英文观后感 Rarely do you get to see a movie that promises a lot and then, lives up to it”s promise. The King”s Speech is a rare piece, indeed. The movie starts off with a stammering speech and signs off with a staggering one, with hardly any glitches in between. The basic premise of the movie is fairly simple. A king with a stutter is helped by a maverick speech therapist to overcome his problem and become an inspiring orator. That sounds like a very known territory to most movie goers. But few minutes into the movie, and you realize that this one simply pushes the bar a notch higher. It is a very pleasing movie, doesn”t lead the audience into a lot of uncomfortable questions. However, the artistry lies in the overall balance of the movie. You slowly start getting gripped by David Seidler”s screenplay. The actors are superb, takes it slow and steady with superb grip on each of their characters. While Colin Firth puts in a spectacular performance (one you can”t miss), Geoffrey Rush goes a bit more old school and pulls off a subtle and deep portrayal. One that fills up your heart but also keeps your brain active. Humor comes in here and there, with a very easy flow and steady pace. Not for a single moment do you perceive the movie as dull. Helena Bonham Carter is good. Guy Pearce is appropriate, though he does look a bit too casual at times (maybe that was an intentional character flaw)。 Most of the movie had been filmed indoors, albeit with eloquent art direction. But the occasional sequences shot outside had been filmed very beautifully, portraying a very dreamy picture of the then England. Sometimes, the camera goes in too close to the characters, and stays there for a while, just long enough to give us a sense of suffocation, quite an artistic equivalent of a speech disorder ! But then again, negative shades had been whitewashed with joyous ones and you never perceive it as a dark movie. Direction wise, Tom Hooper is bang on ! This is the kind of a movie where you want to give a lot of credit to the director. The set-up is such that the dramatic elements are high but needs to be tamed, so that it doesn”t goes over board. And Mr.Hooper hits the bulls eye ! Perfect balance. All points considered, it”s a brilliant movie and a must watch. 【参考译文】 你很少去看一部电影，承诺许多，然后，履行它的承诺。国王的演说是罕见的，的确。 电影开头了与口吃的演讲，做了个惊人的，几乎没有任何瑕疵的。电影的根本前提相当简洁。一个口吃的国王是一个特立独行的言语治疗师克制自己的问题，成为一个鼓舞人心的演说家的帮忙。这听起来像一个众所周知的领土，大多数电影观众。但几分钟的电影，你意识到，这一简洁推酒吧一个高。 这是一部特别令人开心的电影，没有引起观众许多不舒适的问题。然而，艺术性在于电影的整体平衡。你渐渐开头抓住David Seidler的”剧本。演员是一流的，实行缓慢和稳定与精湛的抓地力对他们的每一个字符。而科林菲尔斯放在一个壮丽的表现(一个你不能错过的)，杰弗里·拉什有点更古老，拉了一个微妙的深入刻画。一个布满你的心，但也保持你的大脑活泼。幽默来这里和那里，有一个特别简单流淌和稳定的步伐。你一刻也不认为这部电影是乏味的。海伦娜·伯翰·卡特很好。盖·皮尔斯是适当的，虽然他的确看起来有点偶然(有时这是有意的性格缺陷)。 大局部的电影都是在室内拍摄的，尽管有着清楚的艺术指导。但间或拍摄的序列拍摄得特别美丽，描绘了当时的英国梦幻般的画面。有时候，镜头走得太近了，在那里呆了一段时间，只是长到足以让我们窒息的感觉，相当艺术相当于一个言语障碍!但是，消极的色调被粉刷和欢快的人和你不认为它是一个黑暗的电影。方向明智，汤姆·霍伯榜上!这是一部你想给导演许多荣誉的电影。设置是如此，戏剧性的元素是高的，但需要被驯服，所以它不去板。Hooper先生命中靶心!完善的平衡。 全部的观点认为，这是一部精彩的电影，必需看。