2023年全国大学英语六级(CET-6)考试真题及解析.docx

2023年高校英语六级考试真题试卷及答案明确的目标是前进的动力。只有确定了目标，才能朝着这个方向努力，下面是为大家 搜寻整理的2023年6月高校真题试卷及答案，希望大家能有所收获，更多精彩内容请刚 好关注我们！Part I Writing.Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled The Civil Servant Test Craze. Your essay should start with a brief description of the picture. You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write an essay explaining why it is unwise to judge a person by their appearance. You can give examples to illustrate your point. You should write at least 150 words but no more than 200 words.Section A2、Questions2-11 are based on the following passage.Fear can be an effective way to change behavior. One study compared the effects of high, fear and low-fear appeals on changes in attitudes and behaviors related to the dental hygiene(卫 生).One group of subjects was shown awful pictures of(36)teeth and diseased gums;another group was shown less frightening materials such as plastic teeth, charts, and graphs.Subjects who saw the frightening materials reported more anxiety and a greater(37)to change the way they took care of their teeth than the low-fear group did.But were these reactions actually(38)into better dental hygiene practices? To answer thisimportant question, subjects were called back to the laboratory on two(39)(five days and six weeks after the experiment.They chewed disclosing wafers(牙疾诊断片)that give a red stain to any uncleaned areas of the teeth and thus provided a direct(40)of how well they were really taking care of their tee th.The result showed that the high.fear appeal did actually result in greater and more(41)changes in dental hygiene.That is, the subjects(42)to high-fear warnings brushed their teeth more(43)than did those who saw low-fear warnings.However, to be all effective persuasive device it is very important that the message not be too frightening and that people be given(44)guidelines to help them to reduce the cause of the fear.If this isn't done, they may reduce their anxiety by denying the message or theandtheir needs at an individual level.This is why we can now envisage a different approach get better results.C.Most readers expressed support for the effort, although a number were skeptical, and a few utterly dismissive.about the chances of long.term homeless people adapting well to housing.This is to be expected;if s hard to imagine what we haven't yet seen.As Niccolo Machiavelli wrote in The Prince.one of the major obstacles in any effort to advance systemic change is the44incredulity of men."which is to say that people'Mo not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them.Most of us have witnessed homeless people on the streets for decades.Few have seen formerly homeless people after they have been housed successfully.We don't have reference points fbr that story.So we generalize from what we knowor think.we know.D.But that can be misleading, even to experts.When I asked Rosanne Haggerty, founder of Common Ground, which currently operates 2, 3 1 0 units of supportive housing(with 552 more under construction),what had been her biggest surprise in this work, she replied： "Fifteen years ago, I would not have believed that people who had been so broken and stuck in homelessness could thrive to the degree that they do in our buildings/1 And Becky Kanis, the campaign's director, commented: "There is this sense in our minds that someone who*s on the streets is almost in their DNA different from someone who has a house.The campaign is creating a firsthand experience for many people that that is really not the case.”E. One of the startling realizations that I had while researching this column is that anybody could become like a homeless person-all it takes is a traumatic (创伤的)brain injury. A bicycle fall, a car accident, a slip on the ice, or if you're a soldier, a head wound-and your life could become unrecognizable.James O'Connell, a doctor who has been treating the most vulnerable homeless people on the streets of Boston for 25 years, estimates that 40 percent of the long-term homeless people he*s met had such a brain injury. nFor many it was a head injury prior to the time they became homeless/ he said. nThey became unpredictable. They'd have mood swings, fits of explosive behavior. They couldn't hold onto their jobs. Drinking made them feel better. They'd end up on the streets."F. Once homeless people return to housing, they're in a much better position to rebuild their lives. But its important to note that housing alone is not enough. As with many complex social problems, when you get through the initial crisis, you have another problem to solve which is no less challenging. But it is a better problem.G. Over the past decade, O'Connell has seen this happen. nI spend half my time on the streets or in the hospital and the other half making house calls to people who lived for years on the streets/ he said. "So from a doctor's point of view it*s a delightful switch, but it's not as if putting someone in housing is the answer to addressing all of their problems. Its the first step.”H. Once in housing, formerly homeless people can become isolated and lonely. If they've lived on the streets for years, they may have acquired a certain standing as well as a sense of pride in their survival skills. Now indoors, those aspects of their identity may be stripped away. Many also experience a profound disorientation at the outset. nIf you*re homeless for more than six months, you kind of lose your bearings," says Haggerty. nExistence becomes not about overcoming homelessness but about finding food, begging, looking for a job to survive another day. The whole process of how you define stability gets reordered/1I. Many need regular, if not continuous, support with mental health problems, addictions and illnessesand, equally important, assistance in the day-to-day challenges of life, reacquainting with family, building relationships with neighbors, finding enjoyable activities or work, managing finances, and learning how to eat healthy food.J. For some people, the best solution is to live in a communal （集体）residence, with special sevices.This isn't available everywhere, however. In Boston, for example, homeless people tend to be scattered in apartments throughout the city.K. Common Ground's large residences in New York offer insight into the possibilities for change when homeless people have a rich array of supports. In addition to more traditional social services, residents also make use of communal gardens, classes in things like cooking, yoga, theatre and photography, and job placement. Last year, 188 formerly homeless tenants in four of Common Ground's residences, found jobs.L.Because the properties have many services and are well-managed, Haggerty has found post-housing problems to be surprisingly rare. In the past 10 years, there have been only a handful of incidents of quarrels between tenants. There is very little graffiti （涂鸦）or vandalism （破坏）And the turnover is almost negligible. In the Prince George Hotel in New York, which is home to 208 formerly homeless people and 208 low-income tenants, the average length of tenancy is close to seven years. （All residents pay 30 percent of their income for rent; for the formerly homeless, this comes out of their government Benefits）. When people move on, it is usually because they've found a preferable apartment.M. "Tenants also want to participate in shaping the public areas of the buildings,'1 said Haggerty. nThey formed a gardening committee. They want a terrace on the roof. Those are things I didn*t count on." The most common tenant demand? "People always want more storage space-but thafs true of every New Yorker/' she adds. nIn many ways, we're a lot like a normal apartment building. Our tenants look like anyone else.”N. As I mentioned, homelessness is a catch-all for a variety of problems. A number of readers asked whether the campaign will address family homelessness, which has different causes and requires a different solution. Fve been following some of the promising ideas emerging to address and prevent family homelessness. Later in 2023, Fil explore these ideas in a column. For now, I'll conclude with an update on the 100,000 Homes Campaign. Since Tuesday, New Orleans and a few other communities have reported new results. The current count of people housed is 7,043.Tenants in Common Ground's residences all want more room for storage.48、Homes Campaign provides first-hand proof that the homeless are not what they were once believed to be.49、Common Ground's residences are well-managed and by and large peaceful.50、Housing the homeless is only the first step to solving all their problems.51、A large percent of the chronically homeless have suffered from brain injury.52、After being housed many homeless people become confused at first as to how to deal with life off the street.53、Some people think the best way to help the homeless is to provide them with communal housing.54、 The homeless with health problems should be given regular support in their daily lives.55、Until recently American society has failed to see what homelessness is all about.56、Many formerly homeless tenants in New York's Common Ground's residences got hired.Section C Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A), B), C) and D ). You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.57、Passage OneQuestions57-66are based on the following passage.Technology can make us smarter or stupider, and we need to develop a set of principles to guide our everyday behavior and make sure that tech is improving and not hindering our mental processes. One of the big questions being debated today is: What kind of information do we need to have stored in our heads, and what kind can we leave Hin the cloud,n to be accessed as necessary?An increasingly powerful group within education are championing "digital literacyn. In their view, skills beat knowledge, developing "digital literacy1' is more important than learning mere content, and all facts are now Google-able and therefore unworthy of committing to memory. But even the most sophisticated digital literacy skills won't help students and workers navigate the world if they don't have a broad base of knowledge about how the world actually operates. If you focus on the delivery mechanism and not the content, you're doing kids a disservice.Indeed, evidence from cognitive science challenges the notion that skills can exist independent of factual knowledge. Data from the last thirty years leads to a conclusion that is not scientificallychallengeable: thinking well requires knowing facts, and that's true not only because you need something to think about. The very processes that teachers care about most-critical thinking processes-are intimately interwined （交织）with factual knowledge that is stored in long-term memory.In other words Just because you can Google the date of Black Tuesday doesn*t mean you understand why the Great Depression happened or how it compares to our recent economic slump. There is no doubt that the students of today, and the workers of tomorrow, will need to innovate, collaborate and evaluate.But such skills can't be separated from the knowledge that gives rise to them. To innovate, you have to know what came before. To collaborate, you have to contribute knowledge to the joint venture. And to evaluate, you have to compare new information against knowledge you've already mastered.So here's a principle for thinking in a digital world, in two parts. First, acquire a base of factualknowledge in any domain in which you want to perform well. This base supplies the essential foundation for building skills, and it can't be outsourced （夕卜包）to a search engine.Second, take advantage of computers1 invariable memory, but also the brain's elaborative memory.Computers are great when you want to store information that shouldn't change. But brains are the superior choice when you want information to change, in interesting and useful ways: to connect up with other facts and ideas, to acquire successive layers of meaning, to steep for a while in your accumulated knowledge and experience and so produce a richer mental brew.What is the author's concern about the use of technology?A.It may leave knowledge "in the cloud".B.It may misguide our everyday behavior.C.It may cause a divide in the circles of education.D.It may hinder the development of thinking skills.58、What is the view of educators who advocate digital literacy?A.It helps kids to navigate the virtual world at will.B.It helps kids to broaden their scope of knowledge.C.It increases kid's efficiency of acquiring knowledge.D.It liberates kids from the burden of memorizing facts.59、What does evidence from cognitive science show?A.Knowledge is better kept in long-term memory.B.Critical thinking is based on factual knowledge.C.Study skills are essential to knowledge acquisition.D.Critical thinking means challenging existing facts.60> What does the author think is key to making evaluations?A.Gathering enough evidence before drawing conclusions.B.Mastering the basic roles and principles for evaluation.C.Connecting new information with one*s accumulated knowledge.D.Understanding both what has happened and why it has happened.61、What is the author's purpose in writing the passage?A.To warn against learning through memorizing facts.B.To promote educational reform in the information age.C.To explain human brains1 function in storing information.D.To challenge the prevailing overemphasis on digital literacy.62、Questions62-71 are based on the following passage.America's recent history has been a persistent tilt to the Westof people, ideas, commerce and even political power. California and Texas are the twin poles of the West, but very different ones. For most of the 20th century the home of Silicon Valley and Hollywood has been the brainier and trendier of the two.Texas has trailed behind: its stereotype has been a conservative Christian in cowboy boots. But twins can change places. Is that happening now?It is easy to find evidence that California is in a panic. At the start of this month the once golden state started paying creditors in lOUs （欠条）.The gap between projected outgoings and income for the current fiscal （贝才政的）year has leapt to horrible $26 billion. With no sign of a new budget to close this gulf, one credit agency has already downgraded California's debt. As budgets are cut, universities will let in fewer students, prisoners will be released early and schemes to protect the vulnerable will be rolled back.By contrast, Texa