2023年高考英语全国新课标卷应用文小组合作建议范文集锦-2024届高三英语一轮复习.docx

优点英语2023年6月全国新课标 I/II 卷应用文话题：小组合作建议真题展示:假定你是李华，外教Ryan准备将学生随机分为两人一组，让大家课后练习口语，你认为这样分组存在问题。请你给外教写一封邮件，内容包括：1. 说明问题；2. 提出建议。范文1：Dear RyanI am Li Hua from class 3. Aimed at sharing my suggestions relate to the grouping method in a random way with the purpose of getting our oral English enhanced, Ill drop you the line.What comes first is that pairing off arbitrarily may not necessarily serve to promote its original effect due to lack for scientific method. Providing two students with poor spoken language were put together, they would be stuck in improving their spoken level. Additionally, students interests and hobbies are not taken into account. If two people with different interests are divided together, they have no common interest, leaving the oral practice to a state of silence. Therefore, I cant wait to offer my personal opinion: it is a fabulous idea to enable students to choose their own partners freely. It allows them to learn in a happy moment which not only can it improve the students spoken ability but also it can play a role in strengthening their friendship.Hope my suggestion will exert an enormous function on spoken drill and get twice the result with half the effort. Your prompt reply will be highly appreciated.YoursLi Hua范文2：Dear Ryan,Im Li Hua from Class3. I think its not a good idea to randomly pair up students for the spoken English training class. I have a few reasons for my opinion.Firstly, randomly pairing up students may lead to imbalanced language abilities within the groups. Some students might have advanced speaking skills while others may struggle with basic conversation. This can hinder the progress of both students as the more advanced one may dominate the conversation, leaving little room for the other student to improve. Secondly, students may feel uncomfortable or less motivated if they are paired with someone they dont get along with or have difficulty communicating with. Building a positive and comfortable learning environment is crucial for effective language practice, and randomly assigning pairs might undermine this.Instead, I suggest implementing a system where students can choose their own partners based on their language abilities and personal preferences. This allows students to collaborate with someone they are comfortable with, ensuring a supportive and productive learning environment.YoursLi Hua范文3：Dear teacher,I am writing to express my concerns about the recent grouping method for practicing oral English. Randomly pairing students into groups of two may not be the most effective way to improve our oral English skills, as it has several issues:Firstly, different levels of proficiency can hinder (妨碍) meaningful conversations. Students with vastly different proficiency levels may not be able to help each other effectively, or one student may dominate the conversation, leaving the other with little opportunity to speak. (问题1+危害) Secondly, communication difficulties can arise due to diverse cultural backgrounds and language abilities, making it challenging to engage in meaningful conversations and practice speaking (问题2+危害).To address these issues, I suggest that the teacher group students based on their proficiency levels or interests. This way, students can learn from each other and improve together at a similar pace. Additionally, using topics related to students interests can make the discussions more engaging and motivating. (提出更合理建议)Thank you for considering my suggestions.Sincerely,Li Hua范文4：Dear foreign teacher,I am writing to express my concern about the way you randomly group us in pairs for oral practice. While (尽管) I appreciate your efforts to improve our speaking skills, I have noticed some problems with this method.Firstly, students may be paired with someone whose level is far different from theirs, leading to poor learning outcomes. Secondly, practicing with the same partner for a long time can lead to fatigue (倦怠) and a lack of fresh ideas. Finally, some students may prefer to practice with specific classmates, but random grouping cannot accommodate (适应, 符合) their preferences. To address these issues, I suggest that we adopt a "self-selection" approach. Students can choose their own partners based on their interests and preferences. This would not only increase motivation but also allow for better communication and understanding between partners.Thank you for considering my suggestions.Sincerely,Li Hua范文5：Dear Ryan,Im Li Hua, from Class 3. Im writing to express my concerns about the random grouping method used for our oral English practices and share my suggestions.As students English proficiency varies widely, the random allocation may result in mismatching between the two students when exercising, which could reduce the practicing efficiency. Thus, from my perspective, it could be better to assign partners based on their oral test scores. Besides, for some students who lack initiative and self-discipline, the assignment may turn out to be chitchats with partners instead of deliberate practices. Therefore, an effective supervision mechanism is a necessity to ensure a high-efficient exercise.Thanks for taking my advice into consideration!Yours,Li Hua范文6：Dear Ryan,Im Li Hua, from Class 3. Learning that our English-speaking pairs will be randomly arranged, I would like to bring up some concerns regarding this approach.First, the random arrangement may allocate two students with significantly different oral English levels to one group, which would hinder the progress of both students. Additionally, only two members may also limit the exposure of students to various topics and ideas, so we might find it difficult to engage in a meaningful conversation in English. Therefore, I suggest grouping students according to their English proficiency and it could be highly appreciated if each group could have 3 to 5 members and be offered a sheet of words and topics as a reference for speaking.Thanks a lot for considering my concerns and suggestions.Yours,Li Hua优点英语