Edwards_C01.docx
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_05.gif)
《Edwards_C01.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Edwards_C01.docx(36页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP 1 1 THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP AND THE FIELD OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PAUL EDWARDS The term industrial relations (IR) came into common use in Britain and North America during the 1920s. It has been joined by personnel management (PM) and, since the 1980s, human resource m
2、anagement (HRM). All three denote a practical activity (the management of people) and an area of academic enquiry. Texts in all three fields commonly take as their starting point the corporate assertion that people are our most important asset: if this is indeed so, there is little further need to j
3、ustify a text. Yet we need first to explain what lies behind this apparent axiom. It is then important to highlight some of the key current issues about the conduct of work in modern Britain. We can then consider how IR as an academic approach addresses these issues and the distinction between it an
4、d the other two fields of enquiry. Finally, the structure of the book is explained. First, some basic explanation. Industry is sometimes equated with manufac- turing, as in contrasts between industry and services. Industrial relations has in principle never been so restricted. In practice, however,
5、attention until recently often focused on certain parts of the economy. These in fact embraced more than manufacturing to include the public sector for example, but there was neglect of small firms and large parts of the private service sector. Whether or not there were good reasons for this neglect
6、 (and the case is at least arguable), the situation has changed, and recent research has addressed growing areas of the economy such as call centres. To avoid confusion some writers prefer the term employment relations, and if we were starting from scratch this might be the best label; yet the term
7、industrial relations has become sufficiently embed- ded that it is retained here to cover relations between manager and worker in all spheres of economic activity. The focus is employment: all forms of economic activity in which an employee works under the authority of an employer and 2 PAUL EDWARDS
8、 receives a wage in return for his or her labour. Industrial relations thus excludes domestic labour and also the self-employed and professionals who work on their own account: the contractual relations between a self-employed plumber and his customers are not industrial relations, but the relations
9、 between a plumbing firm and its employees are. In the UK self-employment comprises about 12 per cent of people in employment (see table 1.1, below). The bulk of the working population is thus in an employment relationship, with the great majority of them, of course, being employees rather than empl
10、oyers. Some writers define IR no more exactly than the study of all forms of the employment relationship. This is not sufficiently precise to distinguish it from the economics or sociology of work. More importantly, there are some distinct emphases in an IR approach which give it a specific value in
11、 explaining the world of work. These emphases are discussed below. There has been much debate over the years as to whether the emphases and analytical preferences of IR make it a discipline, as distinct from a field of study. The view taken in this chapter (which is not necessarily shared by other c
12、hapters) is that IR is a field of study and not a distinct discipline. Indeed, one of its strengths is its willingness to draw from different disciplines so that people who specialize in the field have developed an analytical approach which is more than the sum total of the application of individual
13、 disciplines. Even if this view is accepted, there are competing views as to the strengths and weaknesses of the approach, and whether it has responded adequately to the changing nature of work. Some of these issues are addressed below. Why is paid employment important? It is important to the employ
14、ee most obvi- ously as a source of income. Note that it is not the case that work outside employment is an easy alternative: at one time, it was argued by some that a combination of unemployment, self-provisioning and work in the informal economy provided an alternative to the formal economy, but re
15、search found that such work tends to be additional rather than an alternative to formal employment. Work is also important to the employee as a means of identity. What do you do for a living? is a standard query to locate a new acquaintance. And what goes on within the employment relationship is cru
16、cial, not only in terms of the pay that is earned but also the conditions under which it is earned: the degree of autonomy the employee is granted, the safety of the work envir- onment, the opportunity for training and development, and so on. For the employer the work relationship is crucial in two
17、different senses. First, it is commonly argued that capital and technologies are increasingly readily avail- able, so that a firms competitive position depends on the skills and knowledge of its workers. Some analytical grounding for this argument comes from the resource-based view of the firm which
18、 developed from debates on strategic management. This view sees the firm as a bundle of assets and argues that it is the configuration of these assets, rather than positioning in relation to an exter- nal market, which is central to competitive advantage (Wernerfeld 1984; see further chapter 7). Not
19、 surprisingly, HRM and IR writers have latched on to this idea, arguing that distinctive human resources are the core resource (Cappelli and Crocker-Hefter 1996). Second, and fundamentally, these human resources THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP 3 All males 1992 10,971 658 2,260 182 2000 11,917 1,064 2,02
20、9 272 All females 1992 5,963 4,491 420 366 2000 6,489 5,032 427 423 1824 2534 3549 5064 (M) / 5059 (F) 65(M) / 60(F) Males 71.3 88.9 88.5 68.8 7.6 Females 64.1 71.7 74.9 63.9 8.2 Table 1.1 Employment, unemployment and earnings, UK Population by employment status (thousands) Total Males aged 1664 Eco
21、nomically active In employment Unemployed (ILO definition) Economically inactive 1990 18,312 16,175 15,027 1,148 2,136 2000 19,020 16,034 15,049 984 2,987 Females aged 1659 1990 16,706 11,912 11,122 790 4,794 2000 17,292 12,534 11,916 618 4,758 Distribution of employed population (thousands) Employe
22、es Self-employed Full-time Part-time Full-time Part-time Percentage of age group in employment in 2000 Age Percentage of all unemployed who were out of work 12 months in 2000, by age (ILO definitions) Age Males 1824 20.4 2549 39.3 5046.2 Females 10.3 21.2 31.6 Hourly earnings in (all full-time emplo
23、yees) and prices All Earnings Male Female RPI (1987 100) 1990 6.37 6.88 5.31 126.1 2000 10.32 11.00 9.02 170.3 Figures are for spring each year and seasonally adjusted. Earnings data are derived from the New Earnings Survey. Source: Labour Market Trends (March 2001). 4 PAUL EDWARDS are different fro
24、m other resources because they cannot be separated from the people in whom they exist. The employment relationship is about organizing human resources in the light of the productive aims of the firm but also the aims of employees. It is necessarily open-ended, uncertain, and, as argued below, a blen
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Edwards_C01
![提示](https://www.taowenge.com/images/bang_tan.gif)
限制150内