大学都用考试来衡量学生的成绩-第04篇(共1页).doc

《大学都用考试来衡量学生的成绩-第04篇(共1页).doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《大学都用考试来衡量学生的成绩-第04篇(共1页).doc（1页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、精选优质文档-倾情为你奉上议论文背诵范文4 My Views on Examination 1. 大学都用考试来衡量学生的成绩 2. 考生可能带来的副作用 3. 我对考试的看法My Views on ExaminationsIn most colleges and universities the examination is used as a chief means of deciding whether a student succeeds or fails in mastering a particular subject. Although it does the job quite

2、 efficiently, its side effects are also enormous. To begin with, examinations lower the standards of teaching. Since teachers are often judged by examination results, they are reduced to training their students in exam techniques. No subjects can be taught successfully merely through being approache

3、d with intent to take examinations. In addition, the most undesirable effect is that examinations encourage bad study habits. As the examination score is the only criterion for his academic performance, a student is driven to memorize mechanically rather than to think creatively. In fact, few of us

4、admit that examinations can contribute anything really important to the students academic development. If that is the case, why cant we make a change and devise something more efficient and reliable than examination? 我看考试 在绝大多数大学里， 考试是用来衡量学生是否掌握某一课程的主要手段。 虽然考试这一方法比较有效， 但其副作用也相当大。 首先， 考试造成教学水平下降。 由于教师的好坏往往根据学生的考试成绩来判断，所以教师被迫训练学生应试技巧。 而几乎没有什么课程是仅仅通过教授应试技巧就可以教好的。其次， 考试最糟糕的副作用是使学生养成不良的学习习惯。 由于考试成绩是衡量学生学习好坏的唯一标准， 学生只能被迫机械地奇迹硬背， 而不去进行创造性的思考。 实际上， 很少有人承认考试对学生的学习起到重要作用。 如果确实如此， 我们为什么不进行改革， 设计出比考试更有效、更可靠的评估方法呢？专心-专注-专业