美国标准汽油案(共8页).doc
《美国标准汽油案(共8页).doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《美国标准汽油案(共8页).doc(8页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、精选优质文档-倾情为你奉上RESTRICTEDWORLD TRADE WT/DS2/R29 January 1996ORGANIZATION (96-0326)United States - Standards for Reformulatedand Conventional GasolineReport of the PanelI. INTRODUCTION1.1 On 23 January 1995, the United States received a request from Venezuela to hold consultations under Article XXII:1
2、of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (General Agreement), Article 14.1 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) and Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU), on the rule issued by the Environmental Protecti
3、on Agency on 15 December 1993, entitled Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline (WT/DS2/1). The consultations between Venezuela and the United States took place on 24 February 1995. As they did not result in a satisfactory solution of the matter,
4、 Venezuela, in a communication dated 25 March 1995, requested the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) to establish a panel to examine the matter under Article XXIII:2 of the General Agreement and Article 6 of the DSU (WT/DS2/2). On 10 April 1995, the DSB established a panel in accordance with the request
5、made by Venezuela. On 28 April 1995, the parties to the dispute agreed that the Panel should have standard terms of reference (DSU, Art. 7) and agreed on the composition of the Panel as follows:Chairman: Mr. Joseph WongMembers: Mr. Crawford FalconerMr. Kim Luotonen1.2 On 10 April 1995, Brazil reques
6、ted the United States to hold consultations under Article XXII:1 of the General Agreement, Article 14.1 of the TBT Agreement and Article 4 of the DSU on the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency on 15 December 1993 entitled Regulation on Fuels and Fuel Additives - Standards for Reformul
7、ated and Conventional Gasoline (WT/DS4/1). Consultations between Brazil and the United States were held on 1 May 1995 without resulting in a satisfactory solution of the matter. In a communication dated 19 May 1995, Brazil requested the DSB to establish a panel to examine the matter pursuant to Arti
8、cle XXIII of the General Agreement, Article 14 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and Article 6 of the DSU. On 31 May 1995, the DSB established a Panel in accordance with the request made by Brazil.1.3 On 31 May 1995, pursuant to Article 9 of the DSU in respect of multiple complainants,
9、 the DSB decided, with the agreement of all the parties, that for practical reasons this matter be examined by the Panel already established at the request of Venezuela on 10 April 1995. The date of the constitution of the Panel, namely 28 April 1995, remained unchanged. 1.4 Due to the additional ta
10、sk given to the Panel, the DSB agreed upon, at the same meeting, the following terms of reference:To examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the covered agreements cited by Venezuela in document WT/DS2/2 and by Brazil in document WT/DS4/2, the matters referred to the DSB by Venezuela and
11、 Brazil in those documents and to make such findings as will assist the DSB in making the recommendations or in giving the rulings provided for in those agreements.1.5 The Chairman of the DSB recalled Article 9.2 of the DSU which provides that the rights which the parties to the dispute would have e
12、njoyed had separate panels examined the complaints are in no way impaired.1.6 Australia, Canada, the European Communities and Norway reserved their rights to participate in the Panel proceedings as third parties. Only the European Communities and Norway presented arguments to the Panel.1.7 The Panel
13、 met with the parties to the dispute from 10 to 12 July 1995 and from 13 to 15 September 1995. It met with the interested third parties on 11 July 1995.1.8 On 21 September 1995, the Chairman of the Panel informed the DSB that the Panel would not be able to issue its report within six months. The rea
14、sons for that delay are stated in document WT/DS2/5.1.9 The Panel issued its interim report to the parties on 11 December 1995. Following a request made by the United States pursuant to Article 15.2 of the DSU, the Panel held a further meeting with the parties on 3 January 1996. 1.10 The Panel issue
15、d its final report to the parties to the dispute on 17 January 1996.II. FACTUAL ASPECTSA. The Clean Air Act2.1 The Clean Air Act (CAA), originally enacted in 1963, aims at preventing and controlling air pollution in the United States. In a 1990 amendment to the CAA1, Congress directed the Environmen
16、tal Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate new regulations on the composition and emissions effects of gasoline in order to improve air quality in the most polluted areas of the country by reducing vehicle emissions of toxic air pollutants and ozone-forming volatile organic compounds. These new regul
17、ations apply to US refiners, blenders and importers.2.2 Section 211(k) of the CAA divides the market for sale of gasoline in the United States into two parts. The first part, which covers approximately 30 percent of gasoline marketed in the United States, consists of the nine large metropolitan area
18、s that experienced the worst summertime ozone pollution during the period 1987-1989, plus any areas that do not meet national ozone requirements and are added at the request of the governor of the state. These areas are referred to as ozone nonattainment areas, and in this part of the United States
19、only reformulated gasoline may be sold to consumers. In the rest of the United States, conventional gasoline may be sold to consumers.2.3 Section 211(k)(2)-(3) of the CAA established certain compositional and performance specifications for reformulated gasoline. The oxygen content must not be less t
20、han 2.0 percent by weight, the benzene content must not exceed 1.0 percent by volume and the gasoline must be free of heavy metals, including lead or manganese. The performance specifications of the CAA require a 15 percent reduction in the emissions of both volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and tox
21、ic air pollutants (toxics) and no increase in emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx). These requirements are measured by comparing the performance of reformulated gasoline in baseline vehicles (representative model year 1990 vehicles) against the performance of baseline gasoline in such vehicles. Sectio
22、n 211(k)(10) of the CAA defines the specifications of baseline gasoline sold in the summer, which is the high ozone season, and leaves the specifications of winter baseline gasoline to be determined by EPA. It provides, however, that the specifications for winter gasoline shall be those of the indus
23、try average gasoline sold in 1990. For the year 2000 and beyond, the CAA requires that new reformulated gasoline requirements be developed that require a 20-25 percent reduction in emissions of VOCs and toxics, depending on EPAs considerations of feasibility and cost.2.4 The CAA also sets requiremen
24、ts for conventional gasoline, which ensure that each refiners, blenders or importers conventional gasoline sold in the rest of the country remains as clean as it was in 1990. This programme is known as anti-dumping rules because it is designed to prevent refiners, blenders or importers from dumping
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 美国 标准 汽油
限制150内