2020GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得.doc

《2020GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2020GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得.doc（11页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、2020GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得GRE写作中能够同时兼顾立论文ISSUE和驳论文ARGUMENT两篇作文高分的考生较少，许多同学都是在保证一篇文章平均水平的前提下努力写好另一篇文章来提分的。下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作立论驳论文提分心得GRE立论文issue经验分享对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。GRE驳论文argument怎么练?对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下

2、是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。GRE作文逻辑重要吗?虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华因为GRE考的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻

3、辑分析水平。怎样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。GRE写作满分范文Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region s?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?autom

4、obile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?autom

5、obile?accidents?on?the?region s?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville s?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?At?first?look,?this?seems?to?be?a?very?well?presented?arguement.?A?logical?path?is?followed?throughout?the?paragraph?and?the?conclusion?is?expected.?However,?upon?a?

6、second?consideration,?it?is?apparent?that?all?possibilities?were?not?considered?when?the?author?presented?his?conclusion?(or?at?least?that?s/he?did?not?present?all?of?the?possibilities).?There?are?numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?

7、in?Forestville?increased.?Although?it?seems?logical?to?assume?that?the?difference?in?the?percentage?of?accidents?was?due?to?the?difference?in?whether?or?not?the?speed?limit?had?been?increased?during?the?specified?month,?this?does?not?necessarily?mean?that?the?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?wh

8、at?it?originally?was?in?Forestville.?The?author?does?not?state?two?specific?pieces?of?information?that?are?important?before?a?conclusion?such?as?the?one?the?author?made?is?sound.?The?first?is?that?it?is?not?expressed?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?neighboring?regions?had?had?the?same?speed?limi

9、t?before?Forestville s?speed?limit?had?been?increased.?If?they?had?originally?been?the?same,?then?it?is?reasonable?to?conclude?that?Forestville s?speed?limit?should?be?reduced?back?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?However,?if?the?two?region s?speed?limits?were?initially?different,?then?such?a?con

10、clusion?can?not?be?made.?The?second?piece?of?information?that?is?necessary?for?the?present?argument?is?the?relative?number?of?accidents?in?each?of?the?areas?prior?to?the?increase?in?speed?limit.?For?the?author?to?make?the?presented?conclusion,?the?number?of?accidents?should?have?been?approximately?e

11、qual?prior?to?the?increase?in?the?speed?limit?in?Forestville.?If?the?two?missing?pieces?of?information?had?been?presented?and?were?in?the?author s?favor,?then?the?conclusion?that?the?author?made?would?have?been?much?more?sound?than?it?currently?is.?In?conclusion,?the?argument?is?not?entirely?well?re

12、asoned,?but?given?the?information?that?was?expressed?in?the?paragraph,?it?was?presented?well,?and?in?a?logical?order.?Comments:?This?competent?critique?claims?that?there?are? numerous?potential?explanations?for?why?the?number?of?accidents?in?Elmsford?decreased?while?the?number?in?Forestville?increas

13、ed. ?However,?the?author discusses?only?two?points:?-?whether?the?speed?limits?in?the?two?regions?were?originally?the?same;?and?-?the?number?of?accidents?in?each?region?prior?to?Forestville s?raising?the?speed?limit.?Although?the?response?appears?at?first?to?be?well?developed,?there?is?much?less?ana

14、lysis?here?than?the?length?would?suggest.?The?first?third?and?last?third?of?the?essay?are?relatively?insubstantial,?consisting?mainly?of?general?summary?statements?(e.g.,? A?logical?path?conclusion?is?expected ?and? If?the?two?more?sound?than?it?currently?is ).?The?real?heart?of?the?critique?consist

15、s?of?minimal?development?of?the?two?points?mentioned?above.?Therefore,?although?two?important?features?of?the?argument?are?analyzed?and?the?writer?handles?language?and?syntax?adequately,?the?lack?of?substantial?development?keeps?this?critique?from?earning?a?score?higher?than?4.GRE写作满分范文Six?months?ag

16、o?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?region s?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville

17、,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?region s?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestville s?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?

18、increase.?The?agrument?is?well-presented,?but?not?thoroughly?well-reasoned.?By?making?a?comparison?of?the?region?of?Forestville,?the?town?with?the?higher?speed?limit?and?therefore?automobile?accidents,?with?the?region?of?Elmsford,?an?area?of?a?lower?speed?limit?and?subsequently?fewer?accidents,?the?

19、argument?for?reducing?Forestville s?speed?limits?in?order?to?decrease?accidents?seems?logical.?However,?the?citizens?of?Forestville?are?failing?to?consider?other?possible?alternatives?to?the?increasing?car?accidents?after?the?raise?in?speed?limit.?Such?alternatives?may?include?the?fact?that?there?ar

20、e?less?reliable?cars?traveling?the?roads?in?Forestville,?or?that?the?age?bracket?of?those?in?Elmsford?may?be?more?conducive?to?driving?safely.?It?is?possible?that?there?are?more?younger,?inexperienced,?or?more?elderly,?unsafe?drivers?in?Forestville?than?there?are?in?Elmsford.?In?addition,?the?citize

21、ns?have?failed?to?consider?the?geographical?and?physical?terrain?of?the?two?different?areas.?Perhaps?Forestville s?highway?is?in?an?area?of?more?dangerous?curves,?sharp?turns,?or?has?many?intersections?or?merging?points?where?accidents?are?more?likely?to?occur.?It?appears?reasonable,?therefore,?for?

22、the?citizens?to?focus?on?these?trouble?spots?than?to?reduce?the?speed?in?the?entire?area.?Elmsford?may?be?an?area?of?easier?driving?conditions?where?accidents?are?less?likely?to?occur?regardless?of?the?speed?limit.?A?six-month?period?is?not?a?particularly?long?time?frame?for?the?citizens?to?determin

23、e?that?speed?limit?has?influenced?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?the?area.?It?is?mentioned?in?the?argument?that?Elmsford?accidents?decreased?during?the?time?period.?This?may?have?been?a?time,?such?as?during?harsh weather?conditions,?when?less?people?were?driving?on?the?road?and?therefore?the?

24、number?of?accidents?decreased.?However,?Forestville?citizens,?perhaps?coerced?by?employment?or?other?requirements,?were?unable?to?avoid?driving?on?the?roads.?Again,?the?demographics?of?the?population?are?important.?It?is?possible?that?Elmsford?citizens?do?not?have?to?travel?far?from?work?or?work?fro

25、m?their?home,?or?do?not?work?at?all.?Are?there?more?people?in?Forestville?than?there?were?sic?months?ago?If?so,?there?may?be?an?increased?number?of?accidents?due?to?more?automobiles?on?the?road,?and?not?due?to?the?increased?speed?limits.?Also?in?reference?to?the?activities?of?the?population,?it?is?p

26、ossible?that?Forestville?inhabitants?were?traveling?during?less?safe?times?of?the?day,?such?as?early?in?the?morning,?or?during?twilight.?Work?or?family?habits?may?have?encouraged?citizens?to?drive?during?this?time?when?Elmsford?residents?may?not?have?been?forced?to?do?so.?Overall,?the?reasoning?behi

27、nd?decreasing?Forestville s?speed?limit?back?to?its?original?seems?logical?as?presented?above?since?the?citizens?are?acting?in?their?own?best?interests?and?want?to?protect?their?safety.?However,?before?any?final?decisions?are?made?about?the?reduction?in?speed?limit,?the?citizens?and?officials?of?For

28、estville?should?evaluate?all?possible?alternatives?and?causes?for?the?increased?number?of?accidents?over?the?six-month?period?as?compared?to?Elmsford.?Comments:?This?outstanding?response?begins?by?noting?that?the?argument?is? well?presented. ?It?then?proceeds?to?discuss?possible?alternative?explanat

29、ions?for?the?increase?in?car?accidents?and?provides?an?impressively?full?analysis.?Alternatives?mentioned?are?that?-?the?two?regions?might?have?drivers?of?different?ages?and?experience;?-?Forestville s?topography,?geography,?cars,?and/or?roads?might?contribute?to?accidents;?-?six?months?might?be?an?

30、insufficient?amount?of?time?for?determining?that?the?speed?limit?is?linked?to?the?accident?rate;?-?demographics?might?play?a?role?in?auto?accidents;?-?population?and?auto?density?should?be?considered;?and?-?the?times?of?day?when?drivers?in?the?two?regions?travel?might?be?relevant.?The?points?are?cog

31、ently?developed?and?are?linked?in?such?a?way?as?to?create?a?logically?organized?critique.?Transitions?together?with?interior?connections?create?a?smoothly?integrated?presentation.?For?the?most?part,?the?writer?uses?language?correctly?and?well?and?provides?excellent?variety?in?syntax.?The?minor?flaws

32、?(e.g.,?using? less ?instead?of? fewer )?do?not?detract?from?the?overall?high?quality?of?the?critique.?This?is?an?impressive?6?paper.?GRE写作相关文章： GRE写作:高分冲刺 GRE写作:怎样准备提纲 GRE写作:写作论据的技巧 GRE背单词记不住怎么办 GRE写作:怎样缓解紧张 组织主题夏令营活动策划方案2020 夏令营特色活动策划方案 夏令营实践主题活动策划方案范文 有关金字塔原理读后感范文 2020年开学第一课演讲稿800大学2020GRE写作高效学习从模仿开始 刚开始参加GRE考试备考的新手考生，可能会困扰于GRE写作较高的时间和内容要求。模仿是 GRE写作必备实用高分句式 GRE写作考试对于考生的要求不低，要在短短的1小时内完成两篇不同类型的作文，需要考生 2020GRE写作论述观点技巧讲解 在GRE作文的评分中，中国考生普遍担心也容易出现的问题就是写作中出现片面论证。下面 2020GRE写作评分标准 考生想要在新GRE写作中取得好成绩，对于作文评分的标准就必须了解。哪些地方能够帮助 第 11 页 共 11 页