高速公路互通匝道桥典型病害分析及加固设计方案探讨.doc
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a941c/a941c94891209986db9cbdc9640d48895a6dbf9d" alt="资源得分’ title="
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a941c/a941c94891209986db9cbdc9640d48895a6dbf9d" alt="资源得分’ title="
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a941c/a941c94891209986db9cbdc9640d48895a6dbf9d" alt="资源得分’ title="
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a941c/a941c94891209986db9cbdc9640d48895a6dbf9d" alt="资源得分’ title="
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4b1b/c4b1beedf5aaf3901a4036278cca8bfef351082a" alt="资源得分’ title="
《高速公路互通匝道桥典型病害分析及加固设计方案探讨.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《高速公路互通匝道桥典型病害分析及加固设计方案探讨.doc(10页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、【精品文档】如有侵权,请联系网站删除,仅供学习与交流高速公路互通匝道桥典型病害分析及加固设计方案探讨.精品文档.毕 业 设 计(论 文)外 文 参 考 资 料 及 译 文译文题目: Freeway Interchange Ramp Bridge Typical Disease Analysis and Design of Reinforcement学生姓名: 计佳伟 学 号: 0606110105 专 业: 土 木 工 程 所在学院: 建 筑 工 程 学 院 指导教师: 于 洪 宾 职 称: 讲 师 日期: 2010年 2 月 5日Freeway Interchange Ramp Bridge
2、 Typical Disease Analysis and Design of ReinforcementAbstract: In this paper, the Freeway Interchange Ramp Bridge to the typical disease detection, analysis of the causes of disease, and to propose a detailed reinforcement design for the type of bridge type of disease analysis and reinforcement desi
3、gn of a certain reference.1 OverviewInterchange Ramp Bridge is located in C cauda equina cauda equina exchange area, length of 652.50m, the bridge cross-combination of 5 25m +1 20m +2 30m +2 25m +5 25m +5 25m +5 25m +1 21m ; upper structure such as cross-section of prestressed concrete continuous ri
4、gid frame box girder; flat curve of minimum radius of 127.75m. Substructure for the wall piers, drilled pile foundation, integral abutment, expand base; ball bearing; bridge is located 80 joints.In a routine maintenance inspection found that emergence of multi-span box girder webs vertical cracks in
5、 floor box girder vertical and horizontal direction and diagonal cracks appeared. Diagonal cracks appeared beam web. Pier upper vertical and annular cracks appear, some of Pier lateral deviation occurs. For this reason, disease detection units conducted a special inspection, analysis of the causes o
6、f the disease, and the corresponding reinforcement design.2 Ramp Bridge Detection of Disease2.1 The test content and test methodsThe use of bridge inspection vehicle to provide a platform for the bridge on the ramp box Liang Liang body boards, web and flange panels to conduct a comprehensive examina
7、tion, and Pier appearance and deviation, as well as working conditions, bearing a detailed inspection.(1) Pier and beam physical appearance test: close-mainly visual-based and found that the issue of detailed observations. Cracks found in the location of Hong Bi identified and photographed and use G
8、auge, crack width and depth of instrument instrument for crack length, width, depth of observation and recording.(2) supports working conditions inspections: visual damage, abnormal deformation, etc., with or without obvious signs of deformation, pad stone damage and so on. Found to have bearing def
9、ormation, displacement, etc., were used vernier caliper, pad feet etc. measurements.(3) Pier variable-bit observation: the bridge are curved bridge, the piers for the wall piers, while a high degree of both large pier. In order to ensure measurement accuracy, the deviation Pier Pier to take in each
10、horizontal and vertical set up in front of Total Station, Pier were measured horizontal and vertical deviation.2.2 Test resultsThrough the above test to be beam body, Pier, and supports diseases, summary records are as follows:(1) Beams and Pier cracks. Diagonal web cracks in beam focused on cross-f
11、ifth, 10th cross, 11th Cross; girder webs vertical and bottom vertical, horizontal and diagonal cracks concentrated in the third cross, the fourth cross, the first 14 Cross, 17th Cross, 19th cross, 25 cross.8 Pier Top 4 5m away from the pier within the transverse cracks and vertical cracks appeared.
12、(2) 14 bearing lateral slip occurs, the largest displacement of 4.0cm. Most bolt nut rust. One of the niche that supports the upper and lower bolt.(3) Pier maximum horizontal deviation of Pier 13-14, angle of inclination of 6.1 ; vertical deviation up to No. 6 pier, but the angle of inclination of 2
13、.9 .3 Analysis of Disease(1) The end of the beam web of diagonal cracks appeared mainly in the fifth cross, 10th cross, 11th inter-installed by the end of the beam position of expansion joints. As the ramp bridge flat curve radius smaller composite box girder at the moment and torque under the actio
14、n of expansion joints near the end of the beam web may be partially affected by the phenomenon of shear is too large, and thus give rise diagonal cracks.(2) The vertical and bottom girder webs vertical, horizontal and diagonal cracks concentrated in the third cross, 4th cross, 14th cross, 17th Cross
15、, 19th cross, 25 cross. The emergence of these cracks, with the ramp bridge flat curve radius smaller, box girder, moment and torque combined effect clearly related, and because of the passage of overloaded vehicles, increasing the appearance of cracks.(3) Pier cracks arise mainly from the top of th
16、e 4 5m in the Department, this is because the bridge will be part of a continuous rigid frame structure, the piers in the overall coordination of deformation force after the pier from the pier top and bottom about 1 / 3 by the power the most, so that the site easy to cracking phenomenon occurs.4 Str
17、uctural reinforcementFor a typical disease of the bridge appeared, after repeated checking, taking into account experience of other similar bridges reinforced, the following reinforcement.4.1 Superstructure Reinforcement(1) C ramp Pier No. 5 to No. 4 top-side box girder pier on both sides of web 10
18、to the top of Pier No. 9, on both sides of pier-side box girder webs, on the 10th to the pier top 11 on both sides of pier-side box girder web, need to adopt CFRP reinforcement.(2) The reinforcement of the range of 3m by end of the beam section of the entire web, vertical and vertical 30cm wide and
19、carbon fiber cloth are used, spacing 20cm.4.2 Replacement Bearing(1) the need for bearing replacement pier No.: C Ramp Bridge Pier 15, Pier 14, by side. Replaced the original bearing a single, bi-directional sliding pot rubber bearings, vertical to the flat curve of the inside of the bridge to repla
20、ce GPZ (II) 2.5DX, the outer curve replaced GPZ (II) 2.5SX.(2) A temporary pier top reinforced top beam fulcrum.4.3 substructure reinforcementThe analysis considered pairs of C ramp 10, 15, 20, pier substructure reinforcement. Substructure strengthening in three areas:(1) pier reinforcement.As a vas
21、e style of the original pier pier, pier in the lower part of the body size of 200cm 120cm, and with 25cm 15cm chamfered rectangular cross-section segment of the upper half portion of 410cm tall vase style widened section of pier top plane size is 400cm 140cm, and with 10cm 6cm chamfer. Pier reinforc
22、ement symmetrical reinforcement, the vertical center line of the old and new piers coincidence. Reinforced in the lower part of the pier size of 360cm 180cm, and with 25cm 15cm chamfered rectangular cross-section segment of the upper half portion of 410cm tall vase style widened section of pier top
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 高速公路 互通 匝道 典型 病害 分析 加固 设计方案 探讨
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24098/24098a827fdeff034169d5d5017387380bb7100f" alt="提示"
限制150内