大学英语六级分类模拟题(共15页).docx
《大学英语六级分类模拟题(共15页).docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学英语六级分类模拟题(共15页).docx(15页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、精选优质文档-倾情为你奉上大学英语六级分类模拟题318Reading ComprehensionWomen are half the population but only 15% of board members at big American firms, and 10% in Europe. Companies that fish in only half of the talent pool will lose out to those that cast their net more widely. There is also evidence that mixed boards m
2、ake better decisions. Mindful of this, European countries are passing laws that would force companies to promote more women to the executive suite. A new French law requires listed firms to reserve 40% of board seats for women by 2017. Norway and Spain have similar laws; Germany is considering one.
3、The European Parliament declared this month that such quotas should be applied throughout the European Union. There are two main arguments for compulsory quotas. One is that the men who dominate corporate boards are hopelessly sexist: they promote people like themselves and ignore any female talent.
4、 The second argument is more subtle. Talented executives need mentors(导师) to help them climb the ladder. Male directors mentor young men but are reluctant to get friendly with young women, lest the relationship be misinterpreted. Quotas will break this vicious cycle by putting lots of women at the t
5、op, who can then offer their sisters a leg up. There may be something in both arguments, but in most rich countries sexism is no longer the main obstacle to womens careers. Children are. Most women take career breaks to look after them. Many care for elderly relatives, too. One study found that two-
6、thirds of American women had at some point switched from full-time work to part-time or flexible time to balance work and family. Such choices make it harder for women to gain the experience necessary to make it to the very top. What is more, big companies are increasingly global. Many want a boss w
7、ho has worked in more than one country. Such foreign postings disrupt families; many women turn them down. And many, anticipating a career break at some point in the future, enter fields where their skills will not quickly become outdated, such as law or human resources. Some lawyers make good chief
8、 executives. But firms often want people with financial or operational experience for the top jobs, and these fields are still male-dominated. Quotas are too blunt a tool for such a tangled problem. The women companies are compelled to put on boards are unlikely to be as useful as those they place t
9、here voluntarily. Quotas force firms either to pad their boards with token non-executive directors, or to allocate real power on the basis of sex rather than merit. Enforcing quotas for women has led to large numbers of inexperienced women being appointed to boards, and seriously damaged those firms
10、 performance.1、 What will happen to a company if men dominate its executive board? A. Its talent pool will dry out sooner. B. Its competitiveness will be weakened. C. Its women employees will complain. D. It is bound to make unwise decisions.2、 What seems to prevent women from becoming board members
11、 apart from sexism? A. Many of them lack the courage to face the challenge in the board room. B. Male directors are afraid of womens potential threat to their authority. C. Few of them have the training and qualifications needed for executive duties. D. Male directors refrain from giving them guidan
12、ce to avoid misunderstanding.3、 What does the author say is the real barrier to womens careers? A. An apparent lack of necessary legislation. B. Fierce competition from male colleagues. C. The burden of taking care of their family. D. The widespread sexism in the workplace.4、 Why do many women choos
13、e to enter such fields as law or human resources? A. They allow women career breaks if need be. B. They can bring a womans talent into full play. C. They offer high salaries and attractive benefits. DThey pave the way for women to become CEOs.5、What does the author think of the practice of enforcing
14、 quotas for women executives? AIt is a simple solution to a tangled problem. BIt is an effective tool to combat sexism. CIt helps fill the executive board with talents. DIt adversely affects a firms performance.International governments inaction concerning sustainable development is clearly worrying
15、 but the proactive(主动出击的)approaches of some leading-edge companies are encouraging. Toyota, Wal-Mart, DuPont, M&S and General Electric have made tackling environmental wastes a key economic driver. DuPont committed itself to a 65% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the 10 years prior to 2010.
16、By 2007, DuPont was saving $2.2 billion a year through energy efficiency, the same as its total declared profits that year. General Electric aims to reduce the energy intensity of its operations by 50% by 2015. They have invested heavily in projects designed to change the way of using and conserving
17、 energy. Companies like Toyota and Wal-Mart are not committing to environmental goals out of the good-ness of their hearts. The reason for their actions is a simple yet powerful realization that the environ-mental and economic footprints fit well together. When M&S launched its Plan A sustainability
18、 programme in 2007, it was believed that it would cost over $200 million in the first five years. However, the initiative had generated $105 million by 2011/12. When we prevent physical waste, increase energy efficiency or improve resource productivity, we save money, improve profitability and enhan
19、ce competitiveness. In fact, there are often huge quick win opportunities, thanks to years of neglect. However, there is a considerable gap between leading-edge companies and the rest of the pace. There are far too many companies still delaying creating a lean and green business system, arguing that
20、 it will cost money or require sizable capital investment. They remain stuck in the environment is cost mentality. Being environmentally friendly does not have to cost money. In fact, going beyond compliance saves cost at the same time that it generates cash, provided that management adopts the new
21、lean and green model. Lean means doing more with less. Nonetheless, in most companies, economic and environ-mental continuous improvement is viewed as being in conflict with each other. This is one of the big-gest opportunities missed across most industries. The size of the opportunity is enormous.
22、The 3% Report recently published by World Wildlife Fund and CDP shows that the economic prize for curbing carbon emissions in the US economy is $780 billion between now and 2020. It suggests that one of the biggest levers for delivering this opportunity is increased efficiency through management and
23、 behavioural changein other words, lean and green management. Some 50 studies show that companies that commit to such aspirational goals as zero waste, zero harmful emissions, and zero use of non-renewable resources are financially outperforming their competitors. Conversely, it was found that clima
24、te disruption is already costing $1.2 trillion annually, cutting global GDP by 1.6%. Unaddressed, this will double by 2030.6、 What does the author say about some leading-edge companies? A. They operate in accordance with government policies. B. They take initiatives in handling environmental wastes.
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 大学 英语六级 分类 模拟 15
限制150内