《经济学家.doc

《《经济学家.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《《经济学家.doc（4页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、【精品文档】如有侵权，请联系网站删除，仅供学习与交流经济学家.精品文档.TEXT 1Rebuilding the American dream machineJan 19th 2006 | NEW YORKFrom The Economist print editionFOR Americas colleges, January is a month of reckoning. Most applications for the next academic year beginning in the autumn have to be made by the end of December,

2、so a universitys popularity is put to an objective standard: how many people want to attend. One of the more unlikely offices to have been flooded with mail is that of the City University of New York (CUNY), a public college that lacks, among other things, a famous sports team, bucolic campuses and

3、raucous parties (it doesnt even have dorms), and, until recently, academic credibility. A primary draw at CUNY is a programme for particularly clever students, launched in 2001. Some 1,100 of the 60,000 students at CUNYs five top schools receive a rare thing in the costly world of American colleges:

4、 free education. Those accepted by CUNYs honours programme pay no tuition fees; instead they receive a stipend of $7,500 (to help with general expenses) and a laptop computer. Applications for early admissions into next years programme are up 70%.Admission has nothing to do with being an athlete, or

5、 a child of an alumnus, or having an influential sponsor, or being a member of a particularly aggrieved ethnic groupcriteria that are increasingly important at Americas elite colleges. Most of the students who apply to the honours programme come from relatively poor families, many of them immigrant

6、ones. All that CUNY demands is that these students be diligent and clever.Last year, the average standardised test score of this group was in the top 7% in the country. Among the rest of CUNYs students averages are lower, but they are now just breaking into the top third (compared with the bottom th

7、ird in 1997). CUNY does not appear alongside Harvard and Stanford on lists of Americas top colleges, but its recent transformation offers a neat parable of meritocracy revisited.Until the 1960s, a good case could be made that the best deal in American tertiary education was to be found not in Cambri

8、dge or Palo Alto, but in Harlem, at a small public school called City College, the core of CUNY. Americas first free municipal university, founded in 1847, offered its services to everyone bright enough to meet its gruelling standards. Citys golden era came in the last century, when Americas best kn

9、own colleges restricted the number of Jewish students they would admit at exactly the time when New York was teeming with the bright children of poor Jewish immigrants. In 1933-54 City produced nine future Nobel laureates, including the 2005 winner for economics, Robert Aumann (who graduated in 1950

10、); Hunter, its affiliated former womens college, produced two, and a sister branch in Brooklyn produced one. City educated Felix Frankfurter, a pivotal figure on the Supreme Court (class of 1902), Ira Gershwin (1918), Jonas Salk, the inventor of the polio vaccine (1934) and Robert Kahn, an architect

11、 of the internet (1960). A left-wing place in the 1930s and 1940s, City spawned many of the neo-conservative intellectuals who would later swing to the right, such as Irving Kristol (class of 1940, extra-curricular activity: anti-war club), Daniel Bell and Nathan Glazer.What went wrong? Put simply,

12、City dropped its standards. It was partly to do with demography, partly to do with earnest muddleheadedness. In the 1960s, universities across the country faced intense pressure to admit more minority students. Although City was open to all races, only a small number of black and Hispanic students p

13、assed the strict tests (including a future secretary of state, Colin Powell). That, critics decided, could not be squared with Citys mission to “serve all the citizens of New York”. At first the standards were tweaked, but this was not enough, and in 1969 massive student protests shut down Citys cam

14、pus for two weeks. Faced with upheaval, City scrapped its admissions standards altogether. By 1970, almost any student who graduated from New Yorks high schools could attend. The quality of education collapsed. At first, with no barrier to entry, enrolment climbed, but in 1976 the city of New York,

15、which was then in effect bankrupt, forced CUNY to impose tuition fees. An era of free education was over, and a university which had once served such a distinct purpose joined the muddle of Americas lower-end education. By 1997, seven out of ten first-year students in the CUNY system were failing at

16、 least one remedial test in reading, writing or maths (meaning that they had not learnt it to high-school standard). A report commissioned by the city in 1999 concluded that “Central to CUNYs historic mission is a commitment to provide broad access, but its students high drop-out rates and low gradu

17、ation rates raise the question: Access to what? ”Using the report as ammunition, profound reforms were pushed through by New Yorks then mayor, Rudolph Giuliani, and another alumnus, Herman Badillo (1951), Americas first Puerto Rican congressman. A new head of CUNY was appointed. Matthew Goldstein, a

18、 mathematician (1963), has shifted the focus back towards higher standards amid considerable controversy. For instance, by 2001, all of CUNYs 11 “senior” colleges (ie, ones that offer full four-year courses) had stopped offering remedial education. This prompted howls from the teaching faculty, who

19、said it would “create a ghetto-like separation between levels of colleges”, keeping black and Hispanic students out of the best schools. In fact, the racial composition of the senior schools, monitored obsessively by critics, has remained largely unchanged: one in four students at the senior college

20、s is black, one in five is Latino. A third have ties to Puerto Rico, Jamaica, China and the Dominican Republic. Admissions standards have been raised. Students applying to CUNYs senior colleges now need respectable scores on either a national, state or CUNY test, and the admissions criteria for the

21、honours programme are the toughest in the universitys history. Contrary to what Mr Goldsteins critics predicted, higher standards have attracted more students, not fewer: this year, enrolment at CUNY is at a record high. There are also anecdotal signs that CUNY is once again picking up bright locals

22、, especially in science. One advanced biology class at City now has twice as many students as it did in the late 1990s. Last year, two students, both born in the Soviet Union, won Rhodes scholarships, and a Bronx native who won the much sought-after Intel Science Prize is now in the honours programm

23、e. All this should not imply that CUNY is out of the woods. Much of it looks run down. CUNYs annual budget of $1.7 billion has stayed largely unchanged, even as student numbers have risen. With New York Citys finances still precarious, city and state support for the university has fallen by more tha

24、n one-third since 1991 in real terms. It has, however, begun to bring in private money. A new journalism school will open in the autumn, helped by a $4m grant from the Sulzberger family, who control the New York Times, and led by Business Weeks former editor, Steve Shepard (class of 1961). Efforts t

25、o raise a $1.2 billion endowment have passed the half-way mark, helped by (formerly estranged) alumni. Intels former chairman, Andrew Grove, who graduated from City in 1960 as a penniless Hungarian immigrant, donated $26m (about 30% of Citys operating budget) to the engineering school, calling his a

26、lma mater “a veritable American dream machine”.There are broader lessons to draw from CUNY, especially to do with creating opportunities in higher education for the poor. Currently, only 3% of the students in Americas top colleges come from families in the lowest income quartile and only 10% from th

27、e bottom half, according to a study by Anthony Carnevale and Stephen Rose for the Century Foundation. Most students are relatively well-off, and their numbers include plenty of racial minorities who receive preferential status independent of their economic circumstances.For all its imperfections, CUNYs model of low tuition fees and high standards offers a different approach. And its recent history may help to dispel the myth that high academic standards deter students and donors. “Elitism”, Mr Goldstein contends, “is not a dirty word.”