GRE写作：高分技巧范本.docx

《GRE写作：高分技巧范本.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GRE写作：高分技巧范本.docx（8页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、GRE写作：高分技巧GRE写作：高分技巧 1. 娴熟驾驭新GRE写作题库： 为了达到公允，ETS公布了它考试的全部写作题库，那么为了达到能和native speaker一起竞争，考生应当在考前对全部题目都进行预习(节约考试时的审题时间)，并通过100-150个提纲的写作了解GRE写作的一般结构，通过30-50篇写作来练习自己的写作思路和表达。对题库中的题目越娴熟，对考试越有利。 2. 新GRE写作迎合评卷人的评卷思路： 每个评卷人对你文章的评阅特别快，不行能对每个细微环节都很细致地去看。考生应当迎合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的结构和最清楚的表达来体现自己的思路：首段要显明地提出观点，中间段落层

2、次要拉开，每段的起先应当就是该段的topic sentence。 3. 新GRE写作的评分注意三方面 首先，从ETS公布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分主要注意以下三个方面：、逻辑分析实力(要求insightful);、文章的组织(要求well-organized);、语言实力(要求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)。 4. 尽量提高AI部分的写作实力而力保AA部分满分 由于AA的写作不牵涉自己观点的绽开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不困难;而AI的写作须要自己绽开自己设立的观点，不但须要逻辑上的洞察

3、实力，还须要论证观点的实力，语言组织的实力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较困难，难以短期内有较大提高。 GRE写作满分范文赏析 The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper. Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if

4、 no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping ce

5、nters or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage英亩数,面积would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as nat

6、ural parkland. This letter to the editor begins by stating the reasons the residents of Morganton voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state. The letter states that the entire community could benefit from an undeveloped parkland. The residents of the town wanted to ensure that no shopping cen

7、ters or houses would be built there. This, in turn, would provide everyone in the community with a valuable resource, a natural park. The letter then continues by addressing the issue of building a school on the land. The author reasons that this would also benefit the entire community as a natural

8、parkland since much of the land would be devoted to athletic fields. The author of the letter comes to the conclusion that building a school on the land would be the best thing for everyone in the community. This letter is a one-sided argument about the best use of the land known as Scott Woods. The

9、 author may be a parent whose child would benefit from a new school, a teacher who thinks a school would boost the community, or just a resident of Morganton. Regardless of who the author is, there are many aspects of this plan that he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore. Using a piece of land

10、 to build a school is not the same thing as using it for a natural parkland. While all the members of the community could potentially benefit from a parkland, only a percentage of the population would realistically benefit from a new school. The author fails to recognize people like the senior citiz

11、ens of the community. What interest do they have in a new school? It only means higher taxes for them to pay. They will likely never to and utilize the school for anything. On the other hand, anyone can go to a park and enjoy the natural beauty and peacefulness. The use of the land for a school woul

12、d destroy the benefit of a park for everyone. In turn, it would supply a school only to groups of people in exactly the right age range, not too young or too old, to reap the benefits. Another point the author stresses is that the use of the land for things like athletic fields somehow rationalizes

13、the destruction of the park. What about children who don't play sports? Without the school, they could enjoy the land for anything. A playing field is a playing field. Children are not going to go out there unless they are into sports. There are many children in schools who are not interested in

14、 or are not able to play sports. This is yet another group who will be left out of the grand benefits of a school that the author talks about. The author's conclusion that there would be no better use of land in our community than this.is easily arguable. The destruction of Scott Woods for the p

15、urpose of building a school would not only affect the ambience of Morganton, it would affect who would and would not be able to utilize the space. If the residents as a whole voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state, this argument will not sway their decision. The use of the land for a scho

16、ol will probably benefit even less people than a shopping center would. The whole purpose of the vote was to keep the land as an asset for everyone. The only way to do this is to keep it in an undeveloped state. Using the land for a school does not accomplish this. Comments: This outstanding respons

17、e begins somewhat hesitantly; the opening paragraphs summarize but do not immediately engage the argument. However, the subsequent paragraphs target the central flaws in the argument and analyze them in almost microscopic detail. The writer's main rebuttal points out that using a piece of land t

18、o build a school is not the same thing as using it for natural parkland. Several subpoints develop this critique, offering perceptive reasons to counter the argument's unsubstantiated assumptions. This is linked to a related discussion that pointedly exposes another piece of faulty reasoning: th

19、at using land for athletic fields rationalizes the destruction of the park. The extensively developed and organically organized analysis continues into a final paragraph that takes issue with the argument's conclusion that there would be no better use of land in our community than this. Diction

20、and syntax are varied and sophisticated, and the writer is fully in control of the standard conventions. While there may be stronger papers that merit a score of 6, this response demonstrates insightful analysis, cogent development, and mastery of writing. It clearly earns a 6. GRE写作满分范文赏析 The media

21、 (books, film, music, television, for example) tend to create rather than reflect the values of a society. The media is important and there are commercials for business reasons and news and entertainment. For media to become mainstream, it must appeal to many people. The values expressed must be att

22、ractive to the audience, otherwise it will not sell. Example of specific media - Televison: Television rates each show by the number of viewers. Shows that do not have a large audience are usually cancelled and then they can allow time for a new show. Successful shows are duplicated. For example, St

23、ar Trek was successful so it is the creation of many new Star Trek shows (Deep Space Nine, Voyager). Veiwers decide which shows stay or leave. What makes a successful or unsuccessful show? Usually if the audience can identify with an actor, or situation, etc. the show will gain popularity. Special e

24、ffects make shows more interesting; but, if the plot is not acceptable, the show is usually doomed. Comments: This response does not analyze the issue. Unlike many other essays at the 1 score level, this response is fairly easy to read and has, more or less, an overall coherence. The writer's position is that media have to appeal to many people in order to become mainstream, and the brief discussion supports that position. This response was scored a 1 because it does not address the basic issue presented in the topic: do the media create or reflect the values of a society? GRE写作：高分技巧