英美报刊选读12.doc

《英美报刊选读12.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《英美报刊选读12.doc（6页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、【精品文档】如有侵权，请联系网站删除，仅供学习与交流英美报刊选读12.精品文档.Inheritance tax freeze to fund social care cap of 75,000From the Guardian of February 11, 2013Jeremy Hunt says he wants UK to be among first nations where people dont need to sell their home to pay for careJeremy Hunt: social care reforms are protecting people

2、s inheritance The government is expected to introduce a 75,000 cap on the cost of social care, funded by freezing inheritance tax, as it moves to end the scandal in which people are forced to sell their homes, Jeremy Hunt has said.Ministers are determined to protect peoples inheritance, the health s

3、ecretary said, as he rejected suggestions that the Tories were abandoning George Osbornes pre-election pledge to raise the inheritance tax threshold to 1m.Hunt was speaking on the Andrew Marr Show on BBC1 before his statement to parliament on Monday, in which he will outline the governments response

4、 to the Dilnot report on funding social care.He recommended a cap on the amount individuals are expected to pay for care when they become elderly and infirm before the state steps in of between 25,000 50,000, to be settled at 35,000.Hunt all but confirmed the cap would be set at 75,000 after Osborne

5、 warned ministers the Dilnot proposal would cost at least 2bn.The health secretary also came close to confirming reports that the 1bn cost of the new cap would be funded by freezing inheritance tax (IHT) at the current rate of 325,000 until 2019. If IHT, frozen since 2009, increased in line with inf

6、lation every year until 2019 it would reach 420,000.Hunt said: We have a scandal at the moment that every year 30,000 to 40,000 people are having to sell their houses to pay for their care costs. Around 10% of us end up paying more than 100,000 in care costs.If youve got dementia, which is going to

7、affect a million people in the next few years, you have this double whammy. You are trying to cope with this incredibly difficult condition, the loss of your memory, the impact on your relationships with your family. And then you have the double whammy of having to sell your home. That is what we wa

8、nt to sort out.Hunt said the cap was designed to ensure nobody had to pay anything by fostering a culture in which people make provision for their care by making it easier to take out insurance. He said: There is a misunderstanding about the cap. If you set the cap at 75,000, which is the number the

9、 newspapers are talking about this morning, that is not saying we want everyone to pay 75,000 before the state helps.Actually we dont want anyone to pay anything at all. By setting an upper limit to how much people have to pay, then it makes it possible for insurance companies to offer policies for

10、people to have options on their pensions so that anything you pay under the cap is covered.In the Sunday Telegraph the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, writes that the new system should result in nobody having to sell their homes to fund their elderly care, a promise that depends on people taking

11、up private health insurance to cover that initial 75,000 costs.We will make sure no one is forced to sell their home to pay for care in their lifetime, and no one sees their life savings disappear just because they developed the wrong kind of illness, he writes.Hunt dismissed claims that the governm

12、ent was going back on Osbornes pledge in 2007 to raise the inheritance tax threshold to 1m. This was abandoned in the coalition agreement after objections from the Liberal Democrats.The health secretary said: The point of what we are doing is to protect peoples inheritance. The worst thing that can

13、happen is that at the most vulnerable moment in your life you lose the thing you have worked hard for your own house. We are trying to be one of the first countries in the world where people do not end up having to sell their house.The shadow care and older peoples minister, Liz Kendall, said: This

14、would be a small step forward for some people who need residential care in five or more years time. But it wont be fair for people with modest homes. Andrew Dilnot recommended a cap on care costs of 35,000 and warned that anything above 50,000 wont provide adequate protection for people with low inc

15、omes and low wealth.And these proposals wont do anything for the hundreds of thousands of elderly and disabled people who are facing a desperate daily struggle to get the care and support they need right now. More than 1.3bn has been cut from local council budgets for older peoples social care since

16、 the coalition came to power. As a result, many vulnerable people cant get the support they need and are having to pay more for vital services.She called for a bigger and bolder response to meet the needs of the UKs ageing population. We need a . genuinely integrated NHS and social care system which helps older people stay healthy and living independently in their own homes for as long as possible. This is what Labours policy review will address.