血管性认知障碍诊治新进展ppt课件.ppt
《血管性认知障碍诊治新进展ppt课件.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《血管性认知障碍诊治新进展ppt课件.ppt(71页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、VCI的诊治新进展章军建章军建 刘汉兴刘汉兴武汉大学中南医院神经科武汉大学中南医院神经科湖北省痴呆与认知障碍医学临床研究中心湖北省痴呆与认知障碍医学临床研究中心 2VCI的诊治新进展n VCI的定义/诊断标准n VCI的神经心理学评估n VCI的影像学诊断n 如何确定影像学与认知损害的关系n VCI的治疗进展n 小结 3VCI的诊治新进展n VCI的定义/诊断标准n VCI的神经心理学评估n VCI的影像学诊断n 如何确定影像学与认知损害的关系n VCI的治疗进展n 小结 4VCI的发展历史1899年年1969年年1974年年动脉硬化性和老年性痴呆动脉硬化性和老年性痴呆被认为是不同的综合征被认
2、为是不同的综合征Mayer-Gross描述血管性痴呆描述血管性痴呆(VaD)以便于与老年性精神病相鉴别以便于与老年性精神病相鉴别Hachinski 等提出多发梗死性痴呆(等提出多发梗死性痴呆(MID) 和和Hachinski缺血量表缺血量表(HIS)1985年年Loeb 提出适用广泛的提出适用广泛的VaD概念概念1993年年1997年年Petersen提出提出VCI新概念新概念Bowler和和Hachinski提出血管性认知功能提出血管性认知功能损害损害(VCI),又称血管性认知功能障碍又称血管性认知功能障碍 52011年7月AHA/ASA联合发表科学声明-专门针对VCI定义:VCI指存在临床
3、卒中或亚临床脑血管损伤,引起至少一个认知功能区认知功能受损的一组综合征,其中最严重的形式为VaD。Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 6AHA/ASA联合声明-VaD的诊断n The diagnosis of dementia should be based on a decline in cognitive function from a prior baseline and a deficit in performance in 2 cognitive domains that are of sufficient severity to affect the subj
4、ects activities of daily living.n The diagnosis of dementia must be based on cognitive testing, and a minimum of 4 cognitive domains should be assessed: executive/attention, memory, language, and visuospatial functions.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 7AHA/ASA联合声明-VaD的诊断n The deficits in activities of d
5、aily living are independent of the motor/sensory sequelae of the vascular event.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 8AHA/ASA联合声明-很可能VaD的诊断n There is cognitive impairment and imaging evidence of cerebrovascular disease and a. There is a clear temporal relationship between a vascular event (eg, clinical stro
6、ke) and onset of cognitive deficits, or b. There is a clear relationship in the severity and pattern of cognitive impairment and the presence of diffuse, subcortical cerebrovascular disease pathology (eg, as in CADASIL).n There is no history of gradually progressive cognitive deficits before or afte
7、r the stroke that suggests the presence of a nonvascular neurodegenerative disorder.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 9AHA/ASA联合声明-可能VaD的诊断n There is cognitive impairment and imaging evidence of cerebrovascular disease but 1. There is no clear relationship (temporal, severity, or cognitive pattern) betwe
8、en the vascular disease (eg, silent infarcts, subcortical small-vessel disease) and the cognitive impairment. 2. There is insufficient information for the diagnosis of VaD (eg, clinical symptoms suggest the presence of vascular disease, but no CT/MRI studies are available). 3. Severity of aphasia pr
9、ecludes proper cognitive assessment. However, patients with documented evidence of normal cognitive function (eg, annual cognitive evaluations) before the clinical event that caused aphasia could be classified as having probable VaD.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 10AHA/ASA联合声明-可能VaD的诊断n There is cogni
10、tive impairment and imaging evidence of cerebrovascular disease but 4. There is evidence of other neurodegenerative diseases or conditions in addition to cerebrovascular disease that may affect cognition, such as a. A history of other neurodegenerative disorders (eg, Parkinson disease, progressive s
11、upranuclear palsy, dementia with Lewy bodies); b. The presence of Alzheimer disease biology is confirmed by biomarkers (eg, PET, CSF, amyloid ligands) or genetic studies (eg, PS1 mutation); or c. A history of active cancer or psychiatric or metabolic disorders that may affect cognitive function.Stro
12、ke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 11AHA/ASA联合声明-VaMCI的诊断n VaMCI includes the 4 subtypes proposed for the classification of MCI: amnestic, amnestic plus other domains, nonamnestic single domain, and nonamnestic multiple domain.n The classification of VaMCI must be based on cognitive testing, and a minimum of
13、4 cognitive domains should be assessed: executive/attention, memory, language, and visuospatial functions. VaMCI, vascular mild cognitive impairment.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 12AHA/ASA联合声明-VaMCI的诊断n The classification should be based on an assumption of decline in cognitive function from a prior
14、baseline and impairment in at least 1 cognitive domain.n Instrumental activities of daily living could be normal or mildly impaired, independent of the presence of motor/sensory symptoms.Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 13AHA/ASA联合声明-Unstable VaMCIn Subjects with the diagnosis of probable or possible Va
15、MCI whose symptoms revert to normal should be classified as having “unstable VaMCI.”Stroke, 2011;42(9):2672-713. 14VCI概念简单,组成广泛VCI 的组成的组成轻度认知功能损害轻度认知功能损害(MCI)患者)患者所有脑血管疾病所有脑血管疾病相关的认知损害相关的认知损害所有已知的所有已知的VaD类类型和混合型痴呆型和混合型痴呆最常见的认知功最常见的认知功能损害类型,患能损害类型,患病率超过病率超过AD 15VCI诊断核心要素认知损害认知损害血管因素血管因素两者有因果关系两者有因果关系
16、主诉或知情者报告有认知损害,而且客观检查也有认知损害的证据,和(或)客观检查证实认知功能较以往减退包括血管危险因素、卒中病史、神经系统局灶体征、影像学显示的脑血管病证据,以上各项不一定同时具备通过病史、体格检查、实验室和影像学检查确定认知损害与血管因素有因果关系,并能排除其他原因应用合适的诊断工具筛查认知功能损害,确定核心要素应用合适的诊断工具筛查认知功能损害,确定核心要素中华神经科杂志.2011;44(2):142-147. 16VCI的诊治新进展n VCI的定义/诊断标准n VCI的神经心理学评估n VCI的影像学诊断n 如何确定影像学与认知损害的关系n VCI的治疗进展n 小结 17VC
17、I的神经心理学评估n 对VCI的神经心理学评估需要一套综合认知测验。n 执行功能早已被认为是VCI患者的突出特征,故应包含在神经心理成套测验中。但执行功能障碍并非特别地指向脑血管病。n 对认知损害的操作性定义(如低于类似人群的1个或1.5个标准差)优于对症状的定性描述。 18VCI神经心理学评估方案n NINDS-CSN推荐方案 60分钟方案 30分钟方案 5分钟方案Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. 19VCI神经心理学评估方案n Executive/Activation Animal Naming (semantic fluency); Controlled O
18、ral Word Association Test; WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding; Trailmaking Test List Learning Test Strategies Future Use: Simple and Choice Reaction Timen Language/Lexical Retrieval Boston Naming Test 2nd Edition, Short Formn Visuospatial Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Copy Supplemental: Complex Figure Mem
19、ory 60分钟方案Stroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. 20VCI神经心理学评估方案 60分钟方案n Memory Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Alternate: California Verbal Learning Test2 Supplemental: Boston Naming Test Recognition Supplemental: Digit Symbol- Coding Incidental Learningn Neuropsychiatric/Depressive Symptoms Neuropsyc
20、hiatric Inventory Questionnaire Version Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scalen Premorbid Status Informant Questionnaire for Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, Short Form; MMSEStroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. 21VCI神经心理学评估方案 30分钟方案n Semantic Fluency (Animal Naming)n Phonemic Fluency (Contr
21、olled Oral Word Association Test)n Digit Symbol-Coding from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Editionn Hopkins Verbal Learning Testn Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scalen Neuropsychiatric Inventory, Questionnaire Version (NPI-Q)n Supplemental: MMSE, Trail Making TestStroke. 2
22、006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. 22VCI神经心理学评估方案 5分钟方案n MoCA subtests (MoCA分测验) 5-Word Memory Task (registration, recall, recognition) 6-Item Orientation 1-Letter Phonemic FluencyStroke. 2006 Sep;37(9):2220-41. 23MoCA已在中国广泛使用2011年中国血管性认知障碍诊治指南“蒙特利尔认知量表(MoCA)已在中国广泛使用,显示出比MMSE更能识别轻微的认知损害” 24MoCA-MCI的筛查n 简短的认知功能筛
23、查,帮助医生早期发现轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者。n 筛查有轻度认知功能缺损主诉,但MMSE在正常范围的病人。n 与MMSE相比,MoCA记忆测试用的词较多,学习试验较少,回忆前的延迟较长。n 执行功能、高水平语言能力和复杂的视觉空间处理方面在MoCA中均得到采用,其数量比MMSE更多,任务要求比MMSE更高些。 25筛查TIA/卒中后轻度认知损害,MoCA灵敏度优于MMSEn The MoCA and ACE-R had good sensitivity and specificity for MCI defined using the Neurological Disorders and S
24、troke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Battery 1 year after transient ischemic attack and stroke, whereas the MMSE showed a ceiling effect.2012stroke杂志新研究n样本:91例TIA/卒中后患者,女性44%n平均年龄: 73.4岁Stroke.2012;43:464-469. 26VCI的诊治新进展n VCI的定义/诊断标准n VCI的神经心理学评估n VCI的影像学诊断n 如何确定影像学与认知损害的关系n
25、VCI的治疗进展n 小结 27VCI的病因分类n 危险因素相关性VCIn 缺血性VCI 大血管性 小血管性 低灌注性n 出血性VCIn 其他脑血管病性VCIn 脑血管病合并AD 脑血管病伴AD AD伴脑血管病中华神经科杂志中华神经科杂志.2011;44(2):142-147. 28脑小血管病变在VCI中的重要作用 Small vessel disease has an important role in cerebrovascular disease and is a leading cause of cognitive decline and functional loss in the e
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 血管性 认知 障碍 诊治 进展 ppt 课件
限制150内