sci投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容(版).doc

《sci投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容(版).doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《sci投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容(版).doc（36页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、-作者xxxx-日期xxxxSCI投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容(2013版)【精品文档】SCI投稿全过程信件模板与相关内容1很好的博客链接22SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览2一、最初投稿Cover letter2二、催稿信3三、修改稿Cover letter3四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）3五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）4六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）5七、文章校稿信件53SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板zz6一、投稿信6二、询问有无收到稿件6三、询问论文审查回音6四、关于论文的总体审查意见7五、给编辑的回信(很多方面的套话)74SCI论

2、文投稿常见句型和优美句子1000句95英文论文投稿前应该进行的28个细节检查96中科院博士谈SCI论文投稿步骤及经验总结11（一）投稿程序12（二）投稿经验总结137SCI论文写作实战技巧148SCI期刊稿件的准备与投送15稿件的准备15首页或投稿函(cover letter)16著作权声明(authorship responsibility and con-tributions)16版权转让许可(license for publication)17文章类型/栏目(article type)17基金和资金资助(funding disclosure)17利益冲突(conflict of inte

3、rest)18电子文档的准备209一年三篇IF大于7的牛人告诉你怎么写SCI20一、研究生必备四本20二、论文写作要点21三、如何撰写实验研究论文（唐朝枢）21四、如何写好论文讨论部分：科学论文的讨论需要结构化22五、关于写英文文章的秘诀22六、写论文的技巧23优秀论文的要素23优秀论文的误区23写文章的条件23写论文的要点23Reviewer Check List24IEEE Transactions on CSVT Review form24七、论文写作技巧24八、优秀论文结构范例25处理被拒26常见问题261 很好的博客链接http:/w（含多个连接，“SCI论文投稿常见句型和优美句子1

4、000句”）2 SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览2.1 一、最初投稿Cover letterDear Editors:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all au

5、thors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is encl

6、osed.In this work, we evaluated (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable For “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: 2) Name B E-mail: We deeply appreciate Your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving commen

7、ts from the reviewers. If you have any queries, please dont hesitate to contact me at the address below.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 2.2 二、催稿信Dear Prof. :Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about

8、the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to journal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sent to reviewers or not?I would be greatly appreciated

9、 if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear from you on the reviewers comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards! Yours sincerely,Corresponding author: Name: E-mail: 2.3 三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof.（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体

10、负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studie

11、d reviewers comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great ap

12、preciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,Corresponding author:Name: E-mail: 2.4 四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments c

13、oncerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with appr

14、oval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewers comments:Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (简要列出意见)Response: 2. Response to comment: (简要列出意见)Response: 。逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的

15、问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of .We are very sorry for our incorrect writing .It is really true as Reviewer suggested thatWe have made correction according to the Reviewers comments.We have re-written this part according to the Reviewers suggestionAs Reviewer suggested thatC

16、onsidering the Reviewers suggestion, we have 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述Reviewer #3: Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “” were corrected as “”2. Line 107, “” was added 3. Line 129, “” was deleted We tried our best to improve the manus

17、cript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approva

18、l.Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.2.5 五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）Dear Prof. :Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.T

19、hank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,Corresponding author:Name: E-mail: 2.6 六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）Dear :Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agree

20、ment for publication has been sent to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very pleased to hear from you.Thank you very much for your consideratio

21、n.Yours sincerely,Corresponding author:Name: E-mail: 2.7 七、文章校稿信件Dear Mr. :Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the p

22、roof and the answers to the queries are provided below. Corrections:1. In * should be * (Page *, Right column, line*)2. In * the “*” should be “*” (Page *, Right column, line*)Answers for “author queries”:1. *.2. *3. *We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our pape

23、r by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,Corresponding author:Name: E-mail: 3 SCI投稿信件的一些套话和模板zz3.1 一、投稿信1.Dear Dr. Defendi MLI am sending a manuscript. entitled “” by which I should like to submit for pos

24、sible publication in the journal of - .Yours sincerely2. Dear Dr. A:Enclosed is a manuscript. entitled “” by sb, which we are submitting for publication in the journal of - . We have chosen this journal because it deals with - . We believe that sth would be of interest to the journals readers.3. Dea

25、r Dr. A:Please find enclosed for your review an original research article, “” by sb. All authors have read and approve this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. No part of this paper has published or submitted elsewhere. No conflict of interest exi

26、ts in the submission of this manuscript, and we have attached to this letter the signed letter granting us permission to use Figure 1 from another source.We appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers.3.2 二、询问有无收到稿件Dear Editors,We dis

27、patched our manuscript. to your journal on 3 August 2006 but have not, as yet, receive acknowledgement of their safe arrival. We fear that may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know whether or not you have received them. If not, we will send our manuscript. again. Thank you i

28、n advance for your help.3.3 三、询问论文审查回音Dear Editors，It is more than 12 weeks since I submitted our manuscript. (No: ) for possible publication in your journal. I have not yet received a reply and am wondering whether you have reached a decision. I should appreciated your letting me know what you have

29、 decided as soon as possible.3.4 四、关于论文的总体审查意见1. This is a carefully done study and the findings are of considerable interest. A few minor revision are list below.2. This is a well-written paper containing interesting results which merit publication. For the benefit of the reader, however, a number

30、of points need clarifying and certain statements require further justification. There are given below.3. Although these observation are interesting, they are rather limited and do not advance our knowledge of the subject sufficiently to warrant publication in PNAS. We suggest that the authors try su

31、bmitting their findings to specialist journal such as 4. Although this paper is good, it would be ever better if some extra data were added.5. This manuscript. is not suitable for publication in the journal of because the main observation it describe was reported 3 years ago in a reputable journal o

32、f - .6. Please ask someone familiar with English language to help you rewrite this paper. As you will see, I have made some correction at the beginning of the paper where some syntax is not satisfactory.7. We feel that this potentially interesting study has been marred by an inability to communicate

33、 the finding correctly in English and should like to suggest that the authors seek the advice of someone with a good knowledge of English, preferable native speaker.8. The wording and style. of some section, particularly those concerning HPLC, need careful editing. Attention should be paid to the wo

34、rding of those parts of the Discussion of and Summary which have been underlined.9. Preliminary experiments only have been done and with exception of that summarized in Table 2, none has been repeated. This is clearly unsatisfactory, particularly when there is so much variation between assays.10. Th

35、e condition of incubation are poorly defined. What is the temperature? Were antibody used?3.5 五、给编辑的回信(很多方面的套话)1. In reply to the referees main criticism of paper, it is possible to say that One minor point raised by the referee concerns of the extra composition of the reaction mixture in Figure 1.

36、This has now been corrected. Further minor changes had been made on page 3, paragraph 1 (line 3-8) and 2 (line 6-11). These do not affect our interpretation of the result.2. I have read the referees comments very carefully and conclude that the paper has been rejected on the sole grounds that it lak

37、e toxicity data. I admit that I did not include a toxicity table in my article although perhaps I should have done. This was for the sake of brevity rather than an error or omission.3. Thank you for your letter of and for the referees comments concerning our manuscript. entitled “”. We have studied

38、their comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with their approval.4. I enclosed a revised manuscript. which includes a report of additional experiments done at the referees suggestion. You will see that our original findings are confirmed.5. We are sending the revised manuscri

39、pt. according to the comments of the reviewers. Revised portion are underlined in red.6. We found the referees comments most helpful and have revised the manuscript.7. We are pleased to note the favorable comments of reviewers in their opening sentence.8. Thank you for your letter. I am very pleased

40、 to learn that our manuscript. is acceptable for publication in Cancer Research with minor revision.9. We have therefore completed a further series of experiments, the result of which are summarized in Table 5. From this we conclude that intrinsic factor is not account.10. We deleted the relevant pa

41、ssage since they are not essential to the contents of the paper.11. I feel that the reviewers comments concerning Figures 1 and 2 result from a misinterpretation of the data.12. We would have include a non-protein inhibitor in our system, as a control, if one had been available.13. We prefer to reta

42、in the use of Table 4 for reasons that it should be clear from the new paragraph inserted at the end of the Results section.14. Although reviewer does not consider it is important to measure the temperature of the cells, we consider it essential.15. The running title has been changed to “”.16. The M

43、aterials and Methods section now includes details for measuring uptake of isotope and assaying hexokinase.17. The concentration of HAT media (page12 paragraph 2) was incorrectly stated in the original manuscript. This has been rectified. The authors are grateful to the referees for pointing out thei

44、r error.18. As suggested by both referees, a discussion of the possibility of laser action on chromosome has been included (page16, paragraph 2).19. We included a new set of photographs with better definition than those originally submitted and to which a scale has been added.20. Following the sugge

45、stion of the referees, we have redraw Figure 3 and 4.21. Two further papers, published since our original submission, have been added to the text and Reference section. These are:22. We should like to thank the referees for their helpful comments and hope that we have now produced a more balance and

46、 better account of our work. We trust that the revised manuscript. is acceptable for publication.23. I greatly appreciate both your help and that of the referees concerning improvement to this paper. I hope that the revised manuscript. is now suitable for publication.24. I should like to express my appreciation to you and the referees for suggesting how to improve our paper.25. I apologize for the delay in revising the manuscript. This was due to our doing an additional experiment, as suggested by referees.4