2022年如何回复审稿人意见 .pdf
《2022年如何回复审稿人意见 .pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年如何回复审稿人意见 .pdf(5页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、Dear Editor, We have studied the valuable comments from you, the assistant editor and reviewers carefully, and tried our best to revise the manuscript. The point to point responds to the reviewers comments are listed as following: Responds to the rev iewer s comments:Reviewer 1 Comment 1: in page 3,
2、 line 40, we fed rats. changed to rats were fed with. Response: According to the reviewer s comment, we have corrected the sentence. Furthermore, we have had the manuscript polished with a professional assistance in writing. Comment 2: page 25. The style of reference 40 is not right (using initials
3、for the first names). Since this paper has been published, the volume and page Nos should be provided. Response: Thank you for your careful work. We have added the volume and page numbers for reference 40. Reviewer 2 Comment: I would like to thank the authors for their efforts in addressing the crit
4、icisms with additional experiments. The one criticism that they did not address was relating to energy expenditure as the reason that the animals on the low calcium diet gained more weight. While I understand that performing this experiment will not affect the conclusion of this manuscript, I do bel
5、ieve that this point could be discussed in the Discussion section. Response: Thank you for your valuable advice. Based on the previous revision, we further address the relationship between low calcium diet and energy expenditure in the section of discussion according to your thoughtful comments. 精选学
6、习资料 - - - - - - - - - 名师归纳总结 - - - - - - -第 1 页,共 5 页Reviewer 3 Comment 1: In the text you often write: “As previously described”. Unless that paper is from your lab or one of the method paper co-authors is on the present MS this is not quite proper since the statement infers method development from
7、 your lab. There are numerous instances like that in the methods section; these should all be changed “according to those described by. ”Response: We are sorry for this language mistake. We have carefully corrected this phrase throughout the manuscript according to your comment. Comment 2: There are
8、 still some wording, sentence structure and grammatical issues even in this basically well put together MS. For example, while authors may have been excited about the data you cannot start a sentence with “Excitedly” in line 418 or “Whatever ” in line 395.Response: Thank you very much to point out t
9、he sentence structure and grammatical issues in our manuscript. According to the comments from you and the editors, we polished the manuscript with a professional assistance in writing, conscientiously. Comment 3: In my view a big omission in this work is ignoring the anabolic side of lipid metaboli
10、sm as well as thermogenesis issues . For example all animals consumed the same amount of feed but we had extra fat storage in the low Ca diet groups. So where did the extra energy go? Zemel et al (citation 34) in similar work indicate that increased thermogenesis on the high Ca diet explains the dis
11、sipation of dietary energy. Further even though Zemel et al (#34) indicated lipogenesis was enhanced in the low Ca diets that was in 2000 and you should have monitored expression of FAS and UCP either as mRNA abundance or actual FAS/UCP changes via proteomics or blotting techniques. In any case thes
12、e controls are missing here and not emphasized in the MS. Casual reading of this paper would lead to the conclusion that the dietary Ca effect on fat deposition is strictly a function of increased or decreased lipolysis. While lipolysis appears to be a major player, lipogenesis and thermogenesis can
13、not be ignored for completeness. In Fig 8 you also show a decline in cAMP for the low Ca diet. Well beta agonists or cAMP enhancers regulate transcription of adipose and liver FAS (in rats (J Biol Chem 271:2307, 1996) and recently with large animal models (Hausman et al J Animal Science 87:1218, 200
14、9 and Halsey et al J Animal Science 89: 1011, 2011). In addition 精选学习资料 - - - - - - - - - 名师归纳总结 - - - - - - -第 2 页,共 5 页cAMP levels could have been monitored. I really do not like the last sentence in the Abstract line 47-50 where you state that “low calcium diet-induced increase in fat mass was du
15、e to enhanced lipogenesis mediated by an upregulated CaSR signaling pathway ” Your results here show no such thing, this is a completely false statement based on data herein. Correct. You show that high Ca diets enhance lipolysis and low Ca diets are antilipolytic. You did not monitor lipid anabolis
16、m here at all. See also line 255-257 and lines 333-335 of your MS. Response: Thank you for your valuable and thoughtful comments. As you suggested that the anabolic side of lipid metabolism as well as thermogenesis issues should be monitored. We really agree with your viewpoints. In the present stud
17、y, we did find that low calcium diet increased the mRNA level of fatty acid synthase (FAS) in white adipose tissue. Furthermore, the FAS mRNA level were also increased in adipocytes after treatment with 1,25-(OH)2D3in in-vitro experiments. However, the increased FAS mRNA levels were not affected by
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 2022年如何回复审稿人意见 2022 如何 回复 审稿人 意见
限制150内