最新econimic-growth-is-not-prosperity-教师用书.doc
《最新econimic-growth-is-not-prosperity-教师用书.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《最新econimic-growth-is-not-prosperity-教师用书.doc(51页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、精品资料econimic-growth-is-not-prosperity-教师用书.Unit 8Text AEconomic Growth is a Path to Perdition, Not ProsperityI. Introduction 1 BackgroundThis is an interesting essay. It deals with a concept with which we are only too familiar: GDP. Until recently this has been almost our national obsession. We have
2、 all been united to strive for this goal, the goal of raising our GDP. For decades, it has been the measurement of our achievement, and the steady double-digit growth rate has transformed our country into a world economic power. It has filled us with pride and has earned the admiration and envy and
3、awe of many nations. But now the author of this article tells us that there are already many serious thinkers who believe that this obsession of GDP is wrong. He compares this idea to Charles Darwins theory of evolution at a time when the dominating myth was it was God who created everything.Come to
4、 think of it. GDP as a national goal indeed is a relatively recent turn of events. In our country it happened only as a result of the open and reform policy. And the underlining theory does seem to be sound to a certain degree. Our experience shows that high GDP does equal more profits, more jobs, m
5、ore of everything for our consumption, and more prestige, power, and glory for the nation. But the author of this essay challenges this basic assumption. First, he points out that the obsession of GDP leads to mindless consumerism. It results in the endless churning out of products which are unneces
6、sary and useless (He could have added even harmful). Secondly, he argues that GDP-oriented economy is unsustainable and it has already done great damage to human environment. Thirdly, he refutes the assertion that higher GDP is always a reliable indication of greater wellbeing and happiness. Speakin
7、g as an American, its interesting that the author expresses his belief that this blind worship of GDP is inherently deeply rooted in the capitalist system because that system is dominated by the desire for more profit, for which the rich will leave no stone unturned. The author here is challenging t
8、he very foundation of the American society. Of course, in this essay he has neither the space nor intention to give a detailed analysis, let alone offer a well-conceived solution, but he ends the article on a very optimistic note: The economy is a human construct. Its not an act of God. We made it,
9、we can change it.2 Structure3 Teaching tips1) This essay is written in an argumentative style, lending itself for meaningful discussion or debate. 2) Make sure that we understand the authors views fully first, then try to present fairly the case for the opposite side. Try to imagine what proponents
10、of GDP whom the author contemptuously refers to as free-market cheer-leaders, will say in their defense and also what staunch believers of science and technology might say on this issue.3) Encourage students to think originally and critically. Is the concept of GDP absolutely correct? If not, what a
11、re the problems? Is it completely wrong? If it is, can we strive for increasingly low GDP? If GDP is neither absolutely right nor completely wrong, where do we draw the line? What are the alternatives?4) Use the new insights we may find in this text to analyze the problems we are now confronted with
12、 in our own land. Try to achieve a better understanding of the new ideas or policies that have been developed and formed recentlyII. Detailed discussion of the text1. Economic Growth is a Path to Perdition, Not ProsperityIt means “Economic growth leads to hell, not prosperity”. Note the use of allit
13、eration here (Path, perdition and prosperity all start with the letter “p”).2. feature writer for the New Internationalist magazinefeature: a prominent or extra article or story in a newspaper or periodical 特写the New Internationalist: a magazine that has articles about people in many different count
14、ries, and deals especially with the relationship between rich and poor countries and the unfair or unequal ways in which some people and countries are treated.3. Charles Darwin was a rigorous, meticulous scientist. He spent nearly 20 years honing his analysis before publishing his groundbreaking wor
15、k. Rigorous: Here it means exact, accurate, correct, precise, more or less synonymous with “meticulous:.Hone: to sharpen or to give an edge to a razor on a whetstone; Here it is used figuratively to mean to revise and polish until it is perfect4. Darwins slim volume was what we would call a “game ch
16、anger,” a revolutionary work.Slim: thinWhat we would call: Notice the difference between “what we call” and “so-called”. The latter usually implies some disapproval. A “game changer”: a revolutionary, groundbreaking work; a work that changes the overall views of many scientific fields5. Darwin was s
17、ailing into choppy waters. The Church of England had set rigid boundaries, and his thesis was clearly a challenge to the orthodox view.Sailing into choppy waters: coming to a part of the sea that is rough with small waves; used figuratively here meaning entering a dangerous field where you can easil
18、y get into serious troubleSet rigid boundaries: establish strict rules limiting your thinking or action; The Church of England at that time would not allow its members to doubt the Bible. Notice that we also often say: set the rule; set a standard, set a limitorthodox: accepted and obeyed by most pe
19、ople as traditional and correct beliefs and practices (religious, political or economic) 6. The establishment of the time mocked him. There was intense public debate. But Darwin was unflinching.The establishment: See the Notes to the TextMock: scorn or ridicule; making sb or sth look stupid by laugh
20、ing at him/it, mimicking or saying sth unkind; Notice that we often say “mock sb” and “mock at an idea”Intense public debate: Do not mix up “intense” and “tense”. i. Intense: great and extreme e.g.: intense heat; intense cold; intense pain; intense pressure; a) intense competition; intense concentra
21、tion; intense debateii. tense:nervous, anxious, and worried; We often say foe example: a tense meeting, a tense a) situation, a tense atmosphere, a tense silence; tense muscles b) Unflinching: firm, fearless, staunch, undaunted, persistent; It comes from the verb “to flinch” which i. means to sudden
22、ly because you are afraid of being hit or hurt7. Today his core idea that all animals and plants evolve and adapt through natural selection is the bedrock of modern life sciences. Core: When used as a noun, it means the central part of a fruit that contains the seeds, but the word if often used figu
23、ratively. When used a s an adjective, it often means “the most important or basic”, e.g. the core idea, the core belief, the core business, the core responsibility, the core i. subjects, the core curriculum, the core vocabularyBedrock: Used figuratively here, meaning basis, cornerstone or foundation
24、; the ideas and principles ii. on which a belief or system is basedLife sciences: subjects that involve the study of living things (people, animals or plants) and lifeiii. processes such as biology and medicine8. religious fundamentalists and “intelligent design” proponentsintelligent design: the id
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 最新 econimic growth is not prosperity 教师
限制150内