sci论文回复模板(3页).doc

《sci论文回复模板(3页).doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《sci论文回复模板(3页).doc（3页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、-sci论文回复模板-第 3 页 如何在SCI修改稿中回答审稿人的意见，可能直接决定了这篇文章能否最终被录用，但是如何做好SCI修改稿的回复又是很多作者需要头疼的问题，以下是SCI修改稿中回答模板，作者可参考这个模板，做好SCI修改稿回复： List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments

2、are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections

3、in the paper and the responds to the reviewers comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewers comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: ( 简要列出意见 ) Response: 2. Response to comment: ( 简要列出意见 ) Response: 。 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： We are very sorry for our negligence of . We ar

4、e very sorry for our incorrect writing . It is really true as Reviewer suggested that We have made correction according to the Reviewers comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewers suggestion As Reviewer suggested that Considering the Reviewers suggestion, we have 最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人

5、的意见： Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: 同上述 Reviewer #3: Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of “” were corrected as “” 2. Line 107, “” was added 3. Line 129, “” was deleted We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These ch

6、anges will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments a

7、nd suggestions 以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享。 从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见 分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见， 我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高 文章的质量。 从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。 对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。 记得ACS Style Guide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这 也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要 修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。 因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。