外语系本科生英语专业毕业论文装订顺序(MLA格式).doc

《外语系本科生英语专业毕业论文装订顺序(MLA格式).doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《外语系本科生英语专业毕业论文装订顺序(MLA格式).doc（14页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、外语系本科生英语专业毕业论文装订顺序（MLA格式）（注：此格式用于文学、翻译方向的论文）1. 毕业论文封面（汉语）2. 毕业论文首页 （英语）3. 致谢（英文）4. 毕业论文中文摘要及关键词5. 毕业论文英文摘要及关键词6. 目录7. 正文8. 尾注（可选）9. 参考文献（英语文献在前，汉语文献在后）10. 附录（可选）附：论文模板（模板内容仅供参考，毕业生可根据实际情况填写）河南教育学院本科毕业论文 学号：_ 四号黑体20磅字号，华文中宋，加粗，居中从后现代主义视角看等待戈多的反戏剧手法黑体，小三，居中系 名 称： 外 语 系 专 业 名 称： 年 级： 姓 名： 指 导 教 师： 年 月

2、日 A Study of “Anti-play” Techniques on Waiting for Godot from the Perspectives of PostmodernismA Thesis Submittedto the English Department of Henan Institute of Educationin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Degree of Bachelor of ArtsByYour nameSupervisor：Li QingdongMay 25, 2008全文每段首行缩进3

3、-5个字符Acknowledgements (Times New Roman 三号 粗体 居中) I would like to thank all those who have given me their generous helps, commitment and enthusiasm, which have been the major driving force to complete the current paper. Times New Roman 五号，1.5倍行距罗马数字编排页码摘要（此处为宋体，小二号，粗体）宋体，小四号，1.5倍行距本文作者尝试从后现代主义的视角去认识等

4、待戈多的反戏剧手法，感受贝克特通过此剧所传达的后现代主义精神。这里，本文关注了四个典型的后现代主义特征，它们分别是：主体的消失；深层模式削平；不确定性；戏拟和反讽。通过分析我们不仅看到他对传统戏剧规范所进行的空前激烈的颠覆，也体会到他作为后现代主义的先驱所传达给我们的后现代主义精神。贝克特高超的艺术手法不仅在风起云涌的现代主义文学运动中具有独特的艺术价值，而且在刚刚兴起的后现代主义文学的形式革新中独领风骚。关键词：塞缪尔贝克特；等待戈多；反戏剧；后现代主义宋体，小四号，粗体全文每段首行缩进3-5个字符 Abstract（Times New Roman，三号，粗体，居中）Samuel Barcl

5、ay Beckett (1906-1989) was an Irish-born poet, novelist and playwright, and is admittedly regarded as one of the greatest masters in the literary world of 20th century. His masterpiece Waiting for Godot, is widely regarded as a classic of the Theatre of the Absurd. The writer of this thesis tries to

6、 understand those anti-play techniques from the perspectives of postmodernism and perceive the spirit of postmodernism that the play owns. Here, this thesis focuses on four typical features of postmodernism: the dissolution of the subject; depth-less-ness; indeterminacy; parody and irony. By the ana

7、lysis of Becketts anti-play techniques in Waiting for Godot, we can not only perceive how he overthrows traditional dramatic regulations thoroughly and extraordinarily but also experience the spirit of postmodernism that he conveys to us as a precursor of postmodernism. The prominent techniques of B

8、eckett not only have inimitable artistic value in modernism movement, which is surging forward at his times but also leads literary excellence in the newly arisen postmodernism. Key words: Samuel Beckett; Waiting for Godot; anti-play; postmodernismTimes New Roman 五号，1.5倍行距Times New Roman 五号 粗体Times

9、New Roman，三号，粗体，居中 Table of ContentsACKNOWLEDGEMENTSII摘要IIIABSTRACTVTABLE OF CONTENTSVIIIINTRODUCTION1PART ONE THE THEORETICAL PREMISES61.1 The Dissolution of the Subject10Times New Roman 五号，1.5倍行距1.2 Depth-less-ness111.3 Indeterminacy121.3.1 Indeterminacy of the Theme121.3.2 Indeterminacy of Charac

10、ters121.3.3 Indeterminacy of the Plot131.3.4 Indeterminacy of the Language131.4 Parody and Irony14PART TWO DEHUMANIZED CHARACTERS AND PAIRING RELATIONSHIPS IN WAITING FOR GODOT15PART THREE DIRECT EXPRESSION IN WAITING FOR GODOT233.1 Empty Stage and Muddle-headed Characters243.2 Disordered Temporal S

11、tructure263.3 Devalued Language and Silence Aesthetics28PART FOUR THE “INDETERMINACY” IN WAITING FOR GODOT334.1 Indeterminacy of the Characters334.2 Indeterminacy of the Theme384.3 Indeterminacy of the Plot40PART FIVE WAITING FOR GODOT: JUXTAPOSITION OF COMEDY AND TRAGEDY44CONCLUSION50WORKS CITED53

12、Times New Roman 三号，粗体，居中Introduction全文每段首行缩进3-5个字符Samuel Barclay Beckett (1906-1989), an Irish novelist and playwright, is admittedly regarded as one of the greatest masters in the literary world of 20th century. In 1969, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature by right of his eminent play, Wa

13、iting for Godot, which has influenced later generations of contemporary playwrights throughout the world. Actually Beckett considered himself a much better novelist and he thought of his plays as diversions undertaken at times when work on his fiction had brought him to a creative impasse, but since

14、 Waiting for Godot was first performed in Paris on 5 January 1953, the greater part of his literary career has resulted in his special form of writing for the theatre.正文部分用阿拉伯数字编排页码The play contains two acts in which two tramps, Vladimir and Estragon, wait for someone named Godot who is supposed to

15、keep an appointment with them. They are joined by a man and his servant, Pozzo and Lucky, who stay with them briefly, then continue on their unspecified way. A boy comes at the end of the first act to tell Vladimir and Estragon that Mr. Godot will not come that day, but most surely the next. A tree

16、which has been bare of leaves is the only setting, and a moon rises to signify that day has ended and night has come as the first act ends. In the second act, the tree miraculously sprouts a few leaves but nothing else has changed for Vladimir and Estragon. Pozzo and Lucky return and then leave; the

17、 boy comes again and repeats the same information. Vladimir and Estragon are disappointed and consider committing suicide, but they even have not got a rope strong enough to hang themselves. They speak of leaving for several times but they do not move. The moon comes up again, and the curtain falls

18、as the two men stand silently facing the audience in attitudes of solemn dignity, displaying both resignation and dejection.Times New Roman 五号，1.5倍行距The thesis consists of three parts. Part One is an introduction to Samuel Beckett and Waiting for Godot, the research background, the reasons and purpo

19、se of studying Waiting for Godot from the perspectives of postmodernism. Part Two is a detailed analysis of Waiting for Godot and the anti-play techniques of it, basing on four typical features of postmodernism. It is also divided into five chapters. Chapter One is the theoretical premises. Chapter

20、Two focuses on the dehumanized characters and “pairing” relationships in the play. Chapter Three is mainly about Becketts use of “direct expression”, which serves as a strategy of depth-less-ness in postmodernism. Chapter Four is an analysis of “indeterminacy” in this play. The last chapter is about

21、 the juxtaposition of comedy and tragedy. Part Three is a conclusion of the thesis.Part One Dehumanized Characters and Pairing Relationships in Waiting for GodotTimes New Roman 三号，粗体，居中Times New Roman, 小四号，粗体As a practice of postmodernism discourse, the dissolution of the subject is a remarkable fea

22、ture of the Theater of the Absurd. Therefore, in the Theatre of the Absurd, the images of characters are reduced minimally and deprived all the characteristics as “man”. Generally speaking, to represent “man” is the theme of literature all through the ages. In traditional plays, playwrights have por

23、trayed a group of characters with smart brains, passionate temperament, eloquent speechcraft, whereas characters of the Theatre of the Absurd belong to the postmodernists who are in the situation of “burn-out”, so they do not have an integrated “self” but a fragmented one. They do not fight against

24、or comment on the world any more. Actually, they have lost their subjectivity as man and become totally specious bodies. Having been deprived all the dignity of “man”, characters are not “characterized” but “dehumanized” and they themselves are turned into part of the absurd world.1.1 The Dissolutio

25、n of the Subject Postmodernism is an era in which the subject dissolves. Most of the ideologists in western countries believe that with Nietzsches proclaiming of “God is dead”, there comes with human beings death, for all values of human beings lie with God. As it is expected, a hundred years later,

26、 Foucault announces the death of human beings. And he says, “The existence of language comes into being only with the dissolution of the subject” (qtd. in Yan 109). 1.2 Depth-less-ness The “depth-less-ness” is a significant feature of postmodernism, which is called “flatness” or “superficiality” by

27、Jameson (Jameson 4). The depth-less-ness is meant to eliminate the antitheses between surface and essence, latency and patency, authenticity and non-authenticity, signifier and signified. It aims at tending towards surface from essence, towards patency from latency, towards non-authenticity from aut

28、henticity, towards signifier from signified. In a word, profundity is going to be replaced by superficiality here. Jameson explains this depth-less-ness as a loss of the hermeneutic relationship between an image and the viewer: The viewer can no longer interpret an image, due to the depth-less-ness;

29、 the surface of the image is also the meaning of the image, for there is no larger or deeper meaning which can be interpreted through an encounter with the text. There is no meaning beyond the image. The search for greater meaning or understanding of humanity connoted in the image is forgone (Jameso

30、n 8). 1.3 Indeterminacy This term includes all manner of ambiguities, ruptures, and displacements affecting knowledge and society. According to Hassan, indeterminacy, which has various derivative meanings: ambiguity, discontinuity, heterodoxy, pluralism, disorganization, rebellion, misinterpretation

31、 and distortion, is a basic feature of postmodernism. (Hassan 1983: 27-28). The indeterminacy of postmodernism literature is also reflected in four aspects: indeterminacy of the theme; indeterminacy of characters; indeterminacy of the plot and indeterminacy of the language (Liu, Yang and Zeng 15). 1

32、.3.1 Indeterminacy of the ThemeWorks CitedTimes New Roman, 三号Andonian, Cathleen Culotta. The Critical Response to Samuel Beckett. West Port, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1998.Bair, Deirdre. Samuel Beckett. London: Cape, 1978.Baldick, Chris. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford Unive

33、rsity Press, 1996.Baym, Nina et al. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. 6th ed. 5 vols. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2003.曹波. “论贝克特的荒诞派戏剧艺术.” 外语与外语教学. 3 (2004): 29-31.蓝仁哲. “感受荒诞人生 见证反戏剧手法等待戈多剧中人及其处境.” 外国文学评论. 3 (2004): 74-80.李维屏. 英美现代主义文学概观. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 1998.刘象愚, 杨恒达, and 曾艳兵. 从现代主义到后现代主义. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003. 严泽胜. “荒诞派戏剧的后现代审美特征.” 国外文学. 3 (1992): 109-114.曾军. “等待戈多和贝克特的语言策略.” 荆州师专学报. 6 (1994): 51-56.英文部分Times New Roman五号；汉语部分 宋体 五号；均1.5倍行距先英文后中文，以字母顺序排列。两行及以上悬垂缩进3个字符。朱虹. 英美文学散论. 北京: 三联书店, 1984.封底（此部分不编入页码，且不写入任何内容）