2020年全球能源报告:新冠疫情对需求和碳排放的冲击.docx
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_05.gif)
《2020年全球能源报告:新冠疫情对需求和碳排放的冲击.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2020年全球能源报告:新冠疫情对需求和碳排放的冲击.docx(61页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、Abstract.p /UCUS3普 6 一山_In response to the exceptional circumstances stemming from the coronavirus pandemic, the annual IEA Global Energy Review has expanded its coverage to include real-time analysis of developments to date in 2020 and possible directions for the rest of the year. In addition to re
2、viewing 2019 energy and CO2 emissions data by fuel and country, for this section of the Global Energy Review we have tracked energy use by country and fuel over the past three months and in some cases - such as electricity -in real time. Some tracking will continue on a weekly basis. The uncertainty
3、 surrounding public health, the economy and hence energy over the rest of 2020 is unprecedented. This analysis therefore not only charts a possible path for energy use and CO2 emissions in 2020 but also highlights the many factors that could lead to differing outcomes. We draw key lessons on how to
4、navigate this once-in-a-century crisis.Global energy and CO2 emissions in 2020Energy demandThe latest data show that the drastic curtailment of global economic activity and mobility during the first quarter of 2020 pushed down global energy demand by 3.8% relative to the first quarter of 2019. If lo
5、ckdowns last for many months and recoveries are slow across much of the world, as is increasingly likely, annual energy demand will drop by 6% in 2020, wiping off the last five years of demand growth. Such a decline has not been seen for the past 70 years. If efforts to curb the spread of the virus
6、and restart economies are more successful, the decline in energy demand could be limited to under 4%. However a bumpier restart, disruption to global supply chains, and a second wave off infections in the second part of the year could curtail growth even further.Rate of change in global primary ener
7、gy demand, 1900-202020%10%0%-10%1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 202030%-20%IEA 2020. All rights reserved.First quarter of 2020 (compared with first quarter of 2019)Global energy demand in the first quarter of 2020 (Q1 2020) declined by 3.8%, or 150 million tonnes of oil e
8、quivalent (Mtoe), relative to the first quarter of 2019, reversing all the energy demand growth of 2019. The drop in global economic activity cut demand for some energy sources much more than for others, with impacts on demand in Q1 2020 going well beyond declines in GDP for certain sectors and fuel
9、s. e g a.pAJS一s】u6c-4山一In Q1 2020, restrictions on economic activity, as well as changes in weather, hit global coal demand hardest, pushing it down by almost 8% from Q1 2019. The decline took place mainly in the power sector as a result of significant reductions in electricity demand (-2.5%) and co
10、mpetition from very cheap natural gas. The curtailment of industrial production also had an important impact on coal demand over the first three months of the year, with industrial coal demand declining notably in China.Global oil demand was down neariy 5%. Restrictions on travel and the closing of
11、workplaces and borders sharply reduced demand for personal vehicle use and air travel, while the curtailment of global economic activity put a brake on fuel oil use for shipping.Output from the worlds nuclear power plants also declined in Q1 2020 as they adjusted to lower electricity demand levels,
12、particularly in Europe and the United States.Demand for natural gas declined by around 2% in Q1 2020, with China, Europe and the United States experiencing the most significant declines. The drop in demand in major markets was softened by continued low prices for gas, shifting much of the impact of
13、lower electricity demand onto coal. Gas storage levels rose markedly in Q1 2020 because of increases in year-on-year trade in liquefied natural gas (LNG) combined with lower demand.Renewable energy demand increased by about 1.5% in Q1 2020, lifted by the additional output of new wind and solar proje
14、cts that were completed over the past year. In most cases, renewables receive priority in the grid and are not asked to adjust their output to match demand, insulating them from the impacts of lower electricity demand. As a result, the share of renewables in the electricity generation mix rose consi
15、derably, with record-high hourly shares of variable renewables in Belgium, Italy, Germany, Hungary and eastern parts of the United States.Not all of the declines in demand in Q1 2020 were a result of the response to Covid-19. The continuation of milder than average weather conditions throughout most
16、 of the Northern Hemisphere winter also pushed down demand. The impact of weather was particularly strong in the United States, where the majority of the 18% decline in residential and commercial gas consumption can be attributed to a milder winter than in 2019.Differing demand trends for each fuel
17、resulted in significant changes in the global energy mix in Q1 2020. As a result of the drop in global coal demand, the share ofPage 112coal in the mix declined almost 1 full percentage point to below 23%. There was little change in the share of oil and natural gas, however. Renewables experienced t
18、he largest increase, with their share jumping to almost 13%, over half a percentage point above Q1 2019. The change in the power sector mix was even more marked, with renewables increasing their share from 26% in Q1 2019 to 27.5% in Q1 2020.Regional impacts on Q1 2020 energy demand depended on when
19、lockdowns were implemented and how lockdowns affected demand in each country. Drawing on realtime energy demand, mobility and lockdown stringency data, the IEA has assessed the impact of lockdowns and other restriction measures on weekly energy demand compared with corresponding weeks in 2019.Less s
20、tringent restrictions in Korea and Japan have limited the impact on demand to below 10% on average. In China, where Covid-19 lockdowns were first implemented, not all provinces experienced restrictions off the same stringency. Nonetheless, the virus containment measures resulted in weekly energy dem
21、and across China falling by around 15%. Lockdowns in Europe were more gradual, going from partial to full lockdown. Periods of partial lock down cut weekly demand by 17% on average. Countries with higher share of services in the economy and the greater stringency of lockdowns resulted in weather cor
22、rected demand reductions averaging close to 25%, reaching above 30% in some cases. Indias full national lockdown has reduced energy demand by almost 30%, meaning that with each additional week of lockdown, annual energy demand is reduced by 0.6%. Overall we estimate that an additional month of the r
23、estrictions in place as of early April would reduce global annual energy demand by around 1.5%.Impact of Covid 19 containment measures on weekly total energy demandLimited restrictionsLimited restrictionsPartial lockdownFull Lockdown0%0%-5%uo_onpal PUBE p m-10%-15%-20%-25%-30%.PBAJasaJ s61c-u_-35%IE
24、A 2020. All rights reserved.China faced the Covid-19 crisis earlier than other regions, with around eight weeks of lockdown during Q1 2020, more than any other region. As a result, China had the most significant drop in total energy demand, which fell by over 7% compared with Q1 2019.Across the Unit
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 2020 全球 能源 报告 疫情 需求 排放 冲击
![提示](https://www.taowenge.com/images/bang_tan.gif)
限制150内