2015考研英语强化班新题型讲义.docx
《2015考研英语强化班新题型讲义.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2015考研英语强化班新题型讲义.docx(58页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、2010考研英语强化班新题型讲义主讲:李玉技欢迎使用新东方在线电子教材教材说明:本电子教材word文档的页码跟教材完全样,学员只需根据老师说的多少页找到相应的页面学习即可(答案部分)。 请提前预习、认真学习、及时复习,祝广大考研学子考研成功!新题型全真试题(20052009年)第六部分新题型全真试题(20052009年)Passage 1Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from t
2、he list A-G to fit into each of the numbered blanks.There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the gaps. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.(10 points)Canadas premiers (the leaders of provincial governments), if they have any breath left after complaining about Ottawa at their late Jul
3、y annual meeting, might spare a moment to do something, together, to reduce health-care costs.Theyre all groaning about soaring health budgets, the fastest-growing component of which are pharmaceutical costs.41. What to do? Both the Romanow commission and the Kirby committee on health care to say no
4、thing of reports from other experts recommended the creation of a national drug agency. Instead of each province having its own list of approved drugs, bureaucracy, procedures and limited bargaining power, all would pool resources, work with Ottawa, and create a national institution.42. But “nationa
5、l doesnt have to mean that. National* could mean interprovincial provinces combining efforts to create one body.Either way, one benefit of a national organization would be to negotiate better prices, if possible, with drug manufacturers. Instead of having one province or a series of hospitals within
6、 a province - negotiate a price for a given drug on the provincial list, the national agency would negotiate on behalf of all provinces.Rather than, say, Quebec, negotiating on behalf of seven million people, the national agency would negotiate on behalf of 31 million people. Basic economics suggest
7、s the greater the potential consumers, the higher the likelihood of a better price.43. A small step has been taken in the direction of a national agency with the creation of the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment, funded by Ottawa and the provinces. Under it, a Common Drug
8、 Review recommends to provincial lists which new drugs should be included. Predictably, and regrettably, Quebec refused to join.A few premiers are suspicious of any federal-provincial deal-making. They (particularlyQuebec and Alberta) just want Ottawa to fork over additional billions with few, if an
9、y, strings attached. Thals one reason why the idea of a national list hasnt gone anywhere while drug costs keep rising fast.44. Premiers love to quote Mr. Romanows report selectively, especially the parts about morefederal money. Perhaps they should read what he had to say about drugs: A national dr
10、ug agency would provide governments more influence on pharmaceutical companies in order to constrain the ever-increasing cost of drugs.M45. So when the premiers gather in Niagara Falls to assemble their usual complaint list, they should also get cracking about something in their jurisdiction that wo
11、uld help their budgets and patients.A Quebecs resistance to a national agency is provincialist ideology. One of the first advocates for a national list was a researcher at Laval University. Quebecs Drug Insurance Fund has seen its costs skyrocket with annual increases from 14.3 per cent to 26.8 per
12、cent!B Or they could read Mr. Kirbys report: the substantial buying power of such an agency would strengthen the public prescription-drug insurance plans to negotiate the lowest possible purchase prices from drug companies.C What does national mean? Roy Romanow and Senator Michael Kirby recommended
13、a federal -pro vi nci al body much like the recently created National Health Council.D The problem is simple and stark: health-care costs have been, are, and will continue to increase faster than government revenues.E According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, prescription drug cost
14、s have risen since 1997 at twice the rate of overall health-care spending. Part of the increase comes from drugs being used to replace other kinds of treatments. Part of it arises from new drugs costing more than older kinds. Part of it is higher prices.FJ So, if the provinces want to run the health
15、-care show, they should prove they can run it, starting with an interprovincial health list that would end duplication, save administrative costs, prevent one province from being played off against another, and bargain for better drug prices.G Of course the pharmaceutical companies will scream. They
16、 like divided buyers; they can lobby better that way. They can use the threat of removing jobs from one province to another. They can hope that, if one province includes a drug on its list, the pressure will cause others to include it on theirs. They wouldnt like a national agency, but self-interest
17、 would lead them to deal with it.Passage 2Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the list A-G to fit into each of numbered blanks.There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the blanks. Mark your an
18、swers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)On the north bank of the Ohio River sits Evansville, Ind., home of David Williams, 52, and of a riverboat casino where gambling games are played. During several years of gambling in that casino, Williams, a state auditor earning $35,000 a year, lost approximately
19、$175,000. He had never gambled before the casino sent him a coupon for $20 worth of gambling.He visited the casino, lost the $20 and left. On his second visit he lost $800. The casino issued to him, as a good customer, a Fun Card, which when used in the casino earns points for meals and drinks, and
20、enables the casino to track the users gambling activities. For Williams, these activities become what he calls electronic morphine.(41) . In 1997 he lost $21,000 to one slot machine in two days. In March 1997 he lost $72,186. He sometimes played two slot machines at a time, all night, until the boat
21、 locked at 5 a.m., then went back aboard when the casino opened at 9 a.m. Now he is suing the casino, charging that it should have refused his patronage because it knew he was addicted. It did know he had a problem.In March 1998, a friend of Williamss got him involuntarily confined to a treatment ce
22、nter for addictions, and wrote to inform the casino of Williamss gambling problems. The casino included a photo of Williams among those of banned gamblers, and wrote to him a “cease admissions letter. Noting the medical/psychological nature of problem gambling behaviors, the letter said that before
23、being readmitted to the casino he would have to present medical/psychological information demonstrating that patronizing the casino would pose no threat to his safety or well-being.(42) .The Wall Street Journal reports that the casino has 20 signs warning: Enjoy the fun. and always bet with your hea
24、d, not over it. Every entrance ticket lists a toll-free number for counseling from the Indiana Department of Mental Health. Nevertheless, Williamss suit charges that the casino, knowing he was helplessly addicted to gambling, intentionally worked to lure him to engage in conduct against his will. We
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 2015 考研 英语 强化 题型 讲义
限制150内