2022考研英语一真题及答案解析(无法修改可打印).docx
《2022考研英语一真题及答案解析(无法修改可打印).docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022考研英语一真题及答案解析(无法修改可打印).docx(50页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、2022考研英语一真题及答案解 析(完整版)凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构22. Rosenberg holds that public advocates shouldrecruit professional advertisersA learn from advertisers experiencestay away from commercial advertisersB recognize the limitations of advertisementsIn the author s view, Rosenberg s book fails toA adequately p
2、robe social and biological factorseffectively evade the flaws of the social cureB illustrate the functions of state fundingDproduce a long-lasting social effect23. Paragraph 5shows that our imitation of behaviorsis harmful to our networks of friendsA will mislead behavioral studiesoccurs without our
3、 realizing it10第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构can produce negative health habits24. The author suggests in the last paragraph that the effect of peer pressure isA harmfulB desirableC profoundD questionableA deal is a deal-except, apparently ,when Entergy is involved. The company, a major energy supplier
4、 in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announced it was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not challenge the constitutionality of Vermont s rules
5、 in the federal court, as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running. It s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2022, when11第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构the corporation bought Vermont s only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon. As a c
6、ondition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2022. In 2022, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant s license be subject to Vermont legislature s approval. Then, too, the company went a
7、long.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn t foresee what would happen next. A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 207 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage, raised serious questions about both Ver
8、mont Yankee s safety and Entergy s management - especially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe. Enraged by Entergy s behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.12 第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构Now the company is suddenly claiming that the
9、2022 agreement is invalid because of the 2022 legislation, and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues. The legal issues in the case are obscure: whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power, legal scholars say
10、 that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend. Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules. But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to ha
11、ve concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state. But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a poblic trust. Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear stat
12、ion13第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构in Plymouth. Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years. But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company s application, it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are wo
13、rth.25. The phrase “reneging on” (Line 3.para.1)is closest in meaning toAcondemning.Breaffirming. Cdishonoring.D securing.26. By entering into the 2022 agreement, Entergy intended toobtain protection from Vermont regulators.A seek favor from the federal legislature.B acquire an extension of its busi
14、ness license. D get permission to purchase a power plant.27. According to Paragraph 4, Entergy seems to have problems with its14第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构A managerial practices. B technical innovativeness.C financial goals. D business visionIn the author s view, the Vermont case will testA Entergy
15、s capacity to fulfill all its promises.B the mature of states patchwork regulations.C the federal authority over nuclear issues .D the limits of statespower over nuclearissues.28. It can be inferred from the last paragraph thatEntergy s business elsewhere might be affected.A the authority of the NRC
16、 will be defied.B Entergy will withdraw its Plymouth application.C Vermont s reputation might be damaged.15第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method
17、 to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our exp
18、eriences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and accept
19、ance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher s me,16第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构here, now becomes the community s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.Once a discover
20、y claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controllin
21、g the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works it through the community, the interaction and confrontation bet
22、ween shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual s discovery claim into the community s credible discovery.17 第 页共58页凯程考研辅导班,中国最权威的考研辅导机构Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspe
23、ct of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be imp
24、ortant and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “ seeing what everybody has seen and thinking
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 2022 考研 英语 一真题 答案 解析 无法 修改 打印
限制150内