考研英语阅读理解精读100篇.docx
《考研英语阅读理解精读100篇.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考研英语阅读理解精读100篇.docx(53页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、考研英语阅读理解精读100篇之教育类阅读理解精选100篇-教育类考研英语阅读理解精读100篇unit71Unit 71Back in 1922, Thomas Edison predicted that nthe motion picture is destined to revolutionize our educational system and.in a few years it will supplant largely, if not entirely, the use of textbooks.11 Well, we all make mistakes. But at least
2、 Edison did not squander vast quantities of public money on installing cinema screens in schools around the country.With computers, the story has been different. Many governments have packed them into schools, convinced that their presence would improve the pace and efficiency of learning. Large num
3、bers of studies, some more academically respectable than others, have purported to show that computers help children to learn. Now, however, a study that compares classes with computers against similar classes without them casts doubt on that view.In the current Economic Journal, Joshua Angrist of t
4、he Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Victor Lavy of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem look at a scheme which put computers into many of Israels primary and middle schools in the mid-1990s. Dr Angrist and Dr Lavy compare the test scores for maths and Hebrew achieved by children in the fourth
5、 and eighth grades (ie, aged about nine and 13) in schools with and without computers. They also asked the classes teachers how they used various teaching materials, such as Xeroxed worksheets and, of course, computer programs. The researchers found that the Israeli scheme had much less effect on te
6、aching methods in middle schools than in elementary schools. It also found no evidence that the use of computers improved childrens test scores. In fact, it found the reverse. In the case of the maths scores of fourth-graders, there was a consistently negative relationship between computer use and t
7、est scores.The authors offer three possible explanations of why this might be. First, the introduction of computers into classrooms might have gobbled up cash that would otherwise have paid for other aspects of education. But that is unlikely in this case since the money for the programme came from
8、the national lottery, and the study found no significant change in teaching resources, methods or training in schools that acquired computers through the scheme.A second possibility is that the transition to using computers in instruction takes time to have an effect. Maybe, say the authors, but the
9、 schools surveyed had been using the schemes computers for a full school year. That was enough for the new computers to have had a large (and apparently malign) influence on fourth-grade maths scores. The third explanation is the simplest: that the use of computers in teaching is no better (and perh
10、aps worse) than other teaching methods.The bottom line, says Dr Angrist, is that Hthe costs are clear-cut and the benefits are murky. The burden of proof now lies with the promoters of classroom computers. And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper study, with child
11、ren randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods.including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.注(1):本文选自 Economist;10/26/2002, p74;注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象是1999年真题text4(l,2,3,4)和textl第4题(第5题);1. We can learn from the first paragraph thatA motion picture has revolutioniz
12、ed education systemB Edisons prediction has been proved wrongC Edison encouraged schools to install cinema screensD schools are cautious about Edisons idea2. De Angrist and Dr. Lavy have done the following exceptA comparing the test scores of students in different age groupsB interviewing teachers a
13、bout their teaching methodsC launching the computer program in many Israeli schoolsD explaining students, school performance3 According to Dn Angrist and De Lavy, in the Israeli scheme, students didnt make improvement in their test scores because.A other aspects of education were affected due to cas
14、h shortage|B it was not long enough for the program to take effectC there was a negative relationship between computer use and test scoresD the use of computer was no better than other teaching methods4. It can be inferred from the last paragraph thatA there hasnt been a proper study on this issue y
15、etB school authorities should provide proof to support the computer programC installing computers in schools costs too much, but has little or no effectD chalk and talk work better than computer in teaching5. The authors attitude towards governments9 packing computers in schools seems to beA biased|
16、B| indifferentC disapproving|D puzzling答案:BCDAC 篇章剖析:本文为说明文,采用新闻报道体,在第一段以爱迪生所作的错误预测开始,将其与第二段中学校期望通过将电脑引入课堂来改进教学的想法进行对照,引入话题,指出学校的上述想法未必正确。第三段叙述了两位研究人员对以色列在1990年代中期将电脑引入中小学课堂所带来的教学效果的研究,以此说明电脑未必如人们所期望的那样促进课堂学习。第四段,第五段,第六段分别引述了研究人员的解释,并逐一进行分析,最后得出结论:要证明电脑有助于教学,必须进行正确的研究。词汇注释:supplantp图口缸/v.取代,代替(另一个)s
17、quander但容v.挥霍或浪费;放荡地花掉purportv.声称Hebrew以色列语;希伯来人Xerox v.复印reverse相反,颠倒:相反的事物或相反的方面gobble但丫0套。|v.吞并;贪婪地攫取transition 口留同炒年麓/口笃国芭n.转变,转换malign Qp图。炒 adj.有害的:具不良影响的;有害的the bottom line要点或关键之处;结果,结局:最后结果或声明randomly adv.任意地,随便地,allocate 附切几修四.分派,分配难句突破1. First, the introduction of computers into classrooms
18、 might have gobbled up cash that would otherwise have paid for other aspects of education.主体句式:the introduction might have gobbled up cash结构分析:本句是一个主从复合句,主句中的might have gobbled up表示对过去事实的猜测,that引导一个定语从句,限定修饰cash,其中从句中的otherwise常常用来引出虚拟语气,表示要不然;在另一种情况下”。例如: Otherwise I might have helped you.要不然我就帮你了。
19、句子译文:第一,将电脑引入课堂可能会占用本应用于其它教育方面的资金。2. And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper study, with children randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods, including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.主体句式:the way is to conduct a study
20、结构分析:本句是一个复杂长句,不但涉及主从句,还涉及不定式,分词和介词短语。第一个不定式to make their case作定语修饰way,第二个不定式作表语;with引导的介词短语往往可以是“介词+复合宾语”的形式,其中复合宾语可以由现在分词或者过去分词来充当,由它和介词宾语之间的逻辑关系决定,例如:with her hair flying in the wind; with the paper tucked under his arm等;who引导的定语从句修饰教师,分词including引导的短语限定修饰methods=句子译文:而他们所能采用的唯可靠方法当然就是进行适当的研究,学生应
21、该是随机分配给使用电脑教学的教师和使用其他方法教学的教师,包括最廉价的方法:粉笔和谈话。题目分析:1 .答案是B,属事实细节题。文中第一段提到“we all make mistakes”,说明爱迪生的预言是错误的。2 .答案是C,属事实细节题。文中第三段和第四段分别提到两位研究人员compare testscores; ask the classes teachers 和 offer explanations.(0. launch the computer program 则是由以色列政府所为。3 .答案是D,属事实细节题。从文中笫四段,第五段里两位研究人员所给出的解祥以及相应的分析可以看出,
22、学生成绩没有提高主要是因为在教学中使用电脑并不比采用其他方法教学更好。4 .答案是A,属推理判断题。作者在本文第二段中指出,许多学术文章都宣称使用电脑有助于课堂教学,但新的研究对这一说法提出了怀疑。在最后段中,作者说要证明使用电脑有助于教学,就必须进行正确的研究。可见,作者对以前的研究方法提出了质疑。5 .答案是C,属推理判断题。对政府在学校安装电脑一事,作者虽然没有明确提出反对,但字里行间都透出不赞成的态度。在第一段,作者以爱迪生的预言为例,说爱迪生至少没有浪费公共资金,言下之意就是当前发生的情况算得上是浪费公共资金的举动。在最后一段,作者引用研究人员的观点说明在学校安装电脑是成本清楚但收效
23、模糊的事。并提出让支持使用电脑的人采用正确的方法对学校应不应该在教室安装电脑进行论证。可见作者对这一类问题持否定的态度。参考译文:1922年的时候,托马斯爱迪生曾经预测说“电影必将革新我们的教育制度,要不了几年,它就能取代大部分(即便不是全部的)教科书当然,人都会有出错的时候。不过至少在给全国各地的学校安装电影屏幕这件事上,爱迪生并没有浪费大笔公共资金。有了电脑,情况又不一样了。许多政府已经把电脑装进了学校,并深信电脑会提高学习的速度和效率。大量的研究,其中还包括一些学术性更强的研究,都试图说明电脑有助于儿童的学习。不过,现在有一项对用电脑教学和不用电脑教学的课堂的比较研究时这一观点提出了怀疑
24、。在本期经济专刊中,来自麻省理工学院的乔舒亚安格里斯特和耶路撒冷希伯莱大学的维克多拉维对九十年代中期开始在许多以色列中小学安装电脑的计划进行了研究。安格里斯特博士和拉维博士比较了有电脑和没有电脑的四年级和八年级(也就是年龄在9到13岁之间)的儿童在数学和希伯莱语两个科目的考试成绩。他们还访问了课堂教师,询问他们是如何使用各种教学材料,例如复印纸,电脑设备等。两位研究者发现,这个以色列计划在改进中学教学方法方面的效果比小学的效果逊色得多。研究还发现,没有证据证明使用电脑能够提高儿童的考试成绩。实际上,情况正好相反。从四年级学生的数学成绩来看,使用电脑和考试成绩的关系一直成反比。两位作者对这种情况
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 英语 阅读 理解 精读 100
限制150内