供应链成本核算方法.pdf
《供应链成本核算方法.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《供应链成本核算方法.pdf(25页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、CostCost-toto-ServeServe.Project Sponsor:.ZZAgendaAgenda?.Project?ABC vs.CTS?CTS application in sourcing decision-making ProjectProject?Project Title:The design and construction of a decision-support tool for taking sourcing and supply chain route-to-market decisions in the clothing retail industry
2、using real cost-to-serve data.?Objectives:?Literature research on Activity-based Costing and Cost-to-Serve?Using Cost-to-Serve techniques to build a decision-support tool that will guide sourcing decision for a specific clothing businessABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTS?Activity-based costing a powerful costing
3、technique?Unsatisfactory application of ABC in supply chain management?New direction of ABC application?Beyond ABC Cost-to-Serve is a supply chain analytical tool based on activity-based methodologyNote:conclusions in this report are based on literature research,case-study,interview with experienced
4、 consultant and model analysisABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSABC ABC a powerful costing techniquea powerful costing technique?Definition“is a methodology that measures the cost and performance of cost objects,activities and resources.Resources are assign to activities,then activities are assign to cost objects
5、 based on their use.Activity-based costing recognises the causal relationships of cost drivers to activities”(source:CAMI)?Cost allocationCost ObjectsCentreActivitiesCentreResourceCentreAccountAccountAccountAccountAccountAccountABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSABC ABC a powerful costing techniquea powerful costi
6、ng technique?Advantages:?ABC analysis enables managers to slice into the business many different ways by product,customer,or by distribution channel.?ABC methodology figures out and then quantifies causal relationships between cost objects and activities and between activities and resources.Cost dri
7、ve is used to reflect this sort of cause-and-effect relationships;?ABC link a companys process and activities;ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSABC ABC a powerful costing techniquea powerful costing technique?Conclusion:ABC=Multi-facet cost information+reasonable causal relationships+process-based thinking_“has g
8、ained considerable attention as a potentialtool for evaluating supply chain performance through supply chain”(source:Lalonde&Pohlen)ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSABC ABC a powerful costing techniquea powerful costing technique?Expectation:Since 1990s,most firms expected the ABC application in logistics to pro
9、duce results similar to those experienced in manufacturing.?Fact:not exciting!ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSUnsatisfactory application of ABC in supply Unsatisfactory application of ABC in supply chain managementchain managementABC Adoption(UK Survey Result)current user,18%currentlyconsidering,20%rejected aft
10、erassessment,15%had not considered,47%Source:Chartered Institute of Management Accountants 1999ABC Adoption(US Survey Results)considered,decidedagainst,12%planning stage,27%implementing,18%not considered,25%completed and inuse,18%Source:OSU Supply Chain Research Group 1998Conclusion:Adoption:low 18%
11、Rejection:12-15%Hesitation:20%Not considered:25-47%ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSUnsatisfactory application of ABC in supply Unsatisfactory application of ABC in supply chain managementchain management?Motivation behind implementing ABCUKUSPurposeCost reductionCustomer ProfitabilityhighProduct/service pricing
12、Improve cost systemPerformance measurement/improvementBenchmarkingCost ModelingBudgetingBudgetingPurchasing decisionsCustomer profitability analysis Outsourcing decisionsOutput decisionPricingNew product/service designSupply Chain decisionStock valuationReengineeringlowother applicationssource:Chart
13、ered Institute of Management Accountants 1999 OSU Supply Chain Research Group ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSUnsatisfactory application of ABC in supply Unsatisfactory application of ABC in supply chain managementchain management?Implementation Direction in FuturePlans to implement ABC elsewhere in firmslogist
14、icsactivities,23%distributionchannel,16%marketing&sales,14%productionactivities,13%customeractivites,16%other,4%product costs,5%overhead,9%Source:OSU Supply Chain Research Group 1998ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSUnsatisfactory application of ABC in supply Unsatisfactory application of ABC in supply chain mana
15、gementchain management?Reasons behind unsatisfied adoption?Perceived complexity of implementing and maintaining such a system?Using accounting measures can be important,but is not sufficient for the success of supply chain management?Debate on“decision”&“activity”who consumes resources?ABC vs.CTSABC
16、 vs.CTSNew Direction of ABC applicationNew Direction of ABC application?Voices of Practitioners“the newer,slimmer version(ABC)is focused on specific business issues so it needs to come from the logistics or marketing function,with support from finance”(KPMG Tom Anderson)“the huge database of the old
17、-style ABC may be falling by the wayside,but the concept isntits hugely valuable to have the information to understand cost to serve for different products to different customers”(Mercer Les Artran)ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSNew Direction of ABC applicationNew Direction of ABC application?Cost-to-Serve“A m
18、ore complete supply chain costing system must also capture the downstream costs trigged by customers and their products and service orders these are Cost-to-Serve”(source:Cokin)ABC vs.CTSABC vs.CTSBeyond ABC Beyond ABC CostCost-toto-Serve is a supply chain analytical Serve is a supply chain analytic
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 供应 成本核算 方法
限制150内