美国炼油厂排放标准09年补充限值.pdf

《美国炼油厂排放标准09年补充限值.pdf》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《美国炼油厂排放标准09年补充限值.pdf（24页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、Wednesday,October 28,2009 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 9 and 63 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Petroleum Refineries;Final Rule VerDate Nov2008 17:12 Oct 27,2009Jkt 220001PO 00000Frm 00001Fmt 4717Sfmt 4717E:FRFM28OCR3.SGM28OCR3jlentini on DSKJ8S

2、OYB1PROD with RULES355670 Federal Register/Vol.74,No.207/Wednesday,October 28,2009/Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 9 and 63 EPAHQOAR20030146;FRL89724 RIN 2060AO55 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Petroleum Refineries AGENCY:Environmenta

3、l Protection Agency(EPA).ACTION:Final rule.SUMMARY:This action amends the national emission standards for petroleum refineries to add maximum achievable control technology standards for heat exchange systems.This action also amends the general provisions cross-reference table and corrects section re

4、ferences.DATES:The final amendments are effective on October 28,2009.The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the final rule amendments is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 28,2009.ADDRESSES:The EPA has established a docket for this action under D

5、ocket ID No.EPAHQOAR20030146.All documents in the docket are listed in the http:/www.regulations.gov index.Although listed in the index,some information is not publicly available,e.g.,confidential business information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.Certain other mater

6、ial,such as copyrighted material,is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy.Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:/www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center,Environmental Protection Agency,EPA West Build

7、ing,Room 3334,1301 Constitution Ave.,NW.,Washington,DC.The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m.to 4:30 p.m.,Monday through Friday,excluding legal holidays.The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is(202)5661744,and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is(202)5661742.FO

8、R FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:Mr.Robert Lucas,Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,Sector Policies and Programs Division,Coatings and Chemicals Group(E14301),Environmental Protection Agency,Research Triangle Park,North Carolina 27711,telephone number(919)541 0884;fax number(919)5410246;e-mai

9、l address:lucas.bobepa.gov.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:The information in this preamble is organized as follows:I.General Information A.Does this action apply to me?B.Where can I get a copy of this document?C.Judicial Review II.Background Information III.Summary of the Final Amendments to NESHAP for P

10、etroleum Refineries and Changes Since Proposal A.What requirements for heat exchange systems are we promulgating pursuant to CAA section 112(d)(2)?B.What other revisions and clarifications are we making?C.What is the compliance schedule for the final amendments?IV.Summary of Comments and Responses A

11、.Heat Exchange Systems B.General Provisions Applicability V.Summary of Impacts VI.Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A.Executive Order 12866:Regulatory Planning and Review B.Paperwork Reduction Act C.Regulatory Flexibility Act D.Unfunded Mandates Reform Act E.Executive Order 13132:Federalism F.Ex

12、ecutive Order 13175:Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments G.Executive Order 13045:Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks H.Executive Order 13211:Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,Distribution,or Use I.Nation

13、al Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J.Executive Order 12898:Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations K.Congressional Review Act I.General Information A.Does this action apply to me?The regulated category and entities potentially affec

14、ted by this final action include:Category NAICS1code Examples of regulated entities Industry.324110.Petroleum refineries located at a major source that are subject to 40 CFR part 63,subpart CC.1North American Industry Classification System.This table is not intended to be exhaustive,but rather provi

15、des a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this final rule.To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,you should carefully examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.640 of subpart CC(National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Pet

16、roleum Refineries).If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,contact either the air permit authority for the entity or your EPA regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13 of subpart A(General Provisions).B.Where can I get a copy of this docume

17、nt?In addition to being available in the docket,an electronic copy of this final action will also be available on the Worldwide Web through the Technology Transfer Network(TTN).Following signature,a copy of this final action will be posted on the TTNs policy and guidance page for newly proposed or p

18、romulgated rules at the following address:http:/www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/.The TTN provides information and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.C.Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1)of the Clean Air Act(CAA),judicial review of this final rule is available only by filing a pe

19、tition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by December 28,2009.Under section 307(d)(7)(B)of the CAA,only an objection to these final rules that was raised with reasonable specificity during the period for public comment can be raised during judicial

20、review.Moreover,under section 307(b)(2)of the CAA,the requirements established by these final rules may not be challenged separately in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by EPA to enforce these requirements.Section 307(d)(7)(B)of the CAA also provides a mechanism for us to convene a proceedi

21、ng for reconsideration,if the person raising an objection can demonstrate to the EPA that it was impracticable to raise such objection within the period for public comment or if the grounds for such objection VerDate Nov2008 17:12 Oct 27,2009Jkt 220001PO 00000Frm 00002Fmt 4701Sfmt 4700E:FRFM28OCR3.S

22、GM28OCR3jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES355671 Federal Register/Vol.74,No.207/Wednesday,October 28,2009/Rules and Regulations 1We were also required by a Consent Decree to consider and address the application of the NESHAP General Provisions in 40 CFR part 63,subpart A to the existing Refinery

23、MACT 1 rule(subpart CC).2Air Stripping Method(Modified El Paso Method)for Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Water Sources,Revision Number One,dated January 2003,Sampling Procedures Manual,Appendix P:Cooling Tower Monitoring,prepared by Texas Commission on Environmental Qualit

24、y,January 31,2003(incorporated by referencesee 63.14).arose after the period for public comment(but within the time specified for judicial review)and if such objection is of central relevance to the outcome of the rule.Any person seeking to make such a demonstration to us should submit a Petition fo

25、r Reconsideration to the Office of the Administrator,Environmental Protection Agency,Room 3000,Ariel Rios Building,1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW.,Washington,DC 20460,with a copy to the person listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACTsection,and the Associate General Counsel for the Air and

26、 Radiation Law Office,Office of General Counsel(Mail Code 2344A),Environmental Protection Agency,1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW.,Washington,DC 20460.II.Background Information Section 112 of the CAA establishes a regulatory process to address emissions of hazardous air pollutants(HAP)from stationary sourc

27、es.After EPA has identified categories of sources emitting one or more of the HAP listed in section 112(b)of the CAA,section 112(d)calls for us to promulgate national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants(NESHAP)for those sources.For major sources that emit or have the potential to emit an

28、y single HAP at a rate of 10 tons or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tons or more per year,these technology-based standards must reflect the maximum reductions of HAP achievable(after considering cost,energy requirements,and non-air quality health and environmental impacts)an

29、d are commonly referred to as maximum achievable control technology(MACT)standards.For MACT standards,the statute specifies certain minimum stringency requirements,which are referred to as floor requirements.See CAA section 112(d)(3).Specifically,for new sources,the MACT floor cannot be less stringe

30、nt than the emission control that is achieved in practice by the best-controlled similar source.The MACT standards for existing sources can be less stringent than standards for new sources,but they cannot be less stringent than the average emission limitation achieved by the best-performing 12 perce

31、nt of existing sources in the category or subcategory(or the best-performing five sources for categories or subcategories with fewer than 30 sources).In developing MACT,we must also consider control options that are more stringent than the floor.We may establish standards more stringent than the flo

32、or based on the consideration of the cost of achieving the emissions reductions,any non-air quality health and environmental impacts,and energy requirements.We published the final MACT standards for petroleum refineries(40 CFR part 63,subpart CC)on August 18,1995(60 FR 43620).These standards are com

33、monly referred to as the Refinery MACT 1 standards because certain process vents were excluded from this source category and subsequently regulated under a second MACT standard specific to these petroleum refinery process vents(40 CFR part 63,subpart UUU,referred to as Refinery MACT 2).In developing

34、 this rule,we first issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking(ANPR)on March 29,2007.The purpose of the ANPR,which covered the sources subject to the Refinery MACT 1 rule and other source categories,was to solicit additional emissions data and any corrections to the data we already had.We issu

35、ed an initial proposed rule for the petroleum refineries subject to the Refinery MACT 1 on September 4,2007,and held a public hearing in Houston,Texas,on November 27,2007.In response to public comments on the initial proposal,we collected additional information and revised our analysis of the MACT f

36、loor.Based on the results of these additional analyses,we issued a supplemental proposal on November 10,2008,that established a new MACT floor for heat exchange systems.A public hearing for the supplemental proposal was held in Research Triangle Park,North Carolina,on November 25,2008.We are now tak

37、ing final action to establish standards for heat exchange systems in the Refinery MACT 1 standards(40 CFR part 63,subpart CC)and to update and amend Table 6 to 40 CFR part 63,subpart CC.1 III.Summary of Final Amendments to NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries and Changes Since Proposal A.What requirement

38、s for heat exchange systems are we promulgating pursuant to CAA section 112(d)(2)?On September 4,2007,we proposed,under CAA section 112(d)(2),two options for work practice standards for cooling towers:Option 1 was proposed based on our initial assessment of the MACT floor and Option 2 was a beyond-t

39、he-floor option.These options would require the owner or operator of a new or existing source to monitor for leaks in the cooling tower return lines from heat exchangers in organic HAP service(i.e.,lines that contain or contact fluids with 5 percent by weight or greater of total organic HAP listed i

40、n Table 1 of the rule)and,where leaks are detected,to repair such leaks within a specified period of time.On November 10,2008,we issued a supplemental proposal that significantly modified the proposed monitoring methods,leak definitions,and corrective action timeframe based on a revised MACT floor a

41、nd beyond-the-floor analysis.In the supplemental proposal,we also redefined the requirements in terms of heat exchange systems to include the heat exchangers,for which corrective actions are targeted,as part of the source and to specifically address once-through cooling systems.After considering pub

42、lic comments,for purposes of establishing MACT under CAA section 112(d)(2),we have selected the MACT floor requirements specified in the supplemental proposal for heat exchange systems in organic HAP service at petroleum refineries.We rejected the beyond-the-floor option because it is not cost-effec

43、tive.Under these selected requirements,owners and operators of heat exchange systems that are in organic HAP service at new and existing sources are required to conduct monthly sampling and analyses using the Texas Commission on Environmental Qualitys(TCEQ)Modified El Paso Method,Revision Number One

44、,dated January 2003.2For existing sources,a leak is defined as 6.2 parts per million by volume(ppmv)total strippable volatile organic compounds(VOC)in the stripping gas collected via the Modified El Paso Method.For new sources,a leak is defined as 3.1 ppmv total strippable VOC collected via the Modi

45、fied El Paso Method.The amendments require the repair of leaks in heat exchangers in organic HAP service within 45 days of the sampling event in which the leak is detected,unless a delay in repair is allowed.Delay in repair of the leak is allowed until the next shutdown if the repair of the leak req

46、uires the process unit served by the leaking heat exchanger to be shut down and the total strippable VOC concentration is less than 62 ppmv.Delay in repair of the leak is also allowed for up to 120 days VerDate Nov2008 17:12 Oct 27,2009Jkt 220001PO 00000Frm 00003Fmt 4701Sfmt 4700E:FRFM28OCR3.SGM28OC

47、R3jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES355672 Federal Register/Vol.74,No.207/Wednesday,October 28,2009/Rules and Regulations if the total strippable VOC concentration is less than 62 ppmv and if critical parts or personnel are not available.The owner or operator is required to continue monthly monit

48、oring and to repair the heat exchanger within 30 days if sampling results show that the leak exceeds 62 ppmv total strippable VOC.Sampling for leaks can be done for individual or combined heat exchangers.For heat exchange systems including a cooling tower,sampling can be conducted at the combined co

49、oling tower inlet water location.Similarly,for once-through heat exchange systems,the sampling can be conducted after the heat exchanger water is combined and prior to discharge where it will be open to atmosphere.For both cooling tower and once-through heat exchange systems,sampling can be conducte

50、d at individual heat exchangers in the return or exit lines(i.e.,water lines returning the water from the heat exchangers to the cooling tower or to the discharge point).That is,if the cooling tower or once-through system services multiple heat exchangers,the owner or operator may elect to monitor o