剑桥雅思阅读6原文(test2)及答案解析.docx
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_05.gif)
《剑桥雅思阅读6原文(test2)及答案解析.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《剑桥雅思阅读6原文(test2)及答案解析.docx(74页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、剑桥雅思阅读6原文(test2)及答案解析 雅思阅读是块难啃的硬骨头,须要我们做更多的题目才能得心应手。下面我给大家共享一下剑桥雅思阅读6test2原文翻译及答案解析,希望可以帮助到大家。 剑桥雅思阅读6原文(test2) READING PASSAGE 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading Passage 1 on the following pages. Questions 1-5 Reading Passage 1 has five marked paragrap
2、hs, A-E. Choose the correct heading for each paragraph from the list of headings below. Write the correct number, i-viii, in boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet. List of Headings i Avoiding an overcrowded centre ii A successful exercise in people power iii The benefits of working together in cities iv Hi
3、gher incomes need not mean more cars v Economic arguments fail to persuade vi The impact of telecommunications on population distribution vii Increases in travelling time viii Responding to arguments against public transport 1 Paragraph A 2 Paragraph B 3 Paragraph C 4 Paragraph D 5 Paragraph E Advan
4、tages of public transport A new study conducted for the World Bank by Murdoch Universitys Institute for Science and Technology Policy (ISTP) has demonstrated that public transport is more efficient than cars. The study compared the proportion of wealth poured into transport by thirty-seven cities ar
5、ound the world. This included both the public and private costs of building, maintaining and using a transport system. The study found that the Western Australian city of Perth is a good example of a city with minimal public transport. As a result, 17% of its wealth went into transport costs. Some E
6、uropean and Asian cities, on the other hand, spent as little as 5%. Professor Peter Newman, ISTP Director, pointed out that these more efficient cities were able to put the difference into attracting industry and jobs or creating a better place to live. According to Professor Newman, the larger Aust
7、ralian city of Melbourne is a rather unusual city in this sort of comparison. He describes it as two cities: A European city surrounded by a car-dependent one. Melbournes large tram network has made car use in the inner city much lower, but the outer suburbs have the same car-based structure as most
8、 other Australian cities. The explosion in demand for accommodation in the inner suburbs of Melbourne suggests a recent change in many peoples preferences as to where they live. Newman says this is a new, broader way of considering public transport issues. In the past, the case for public transport
9、has been made on the basis of environmental and social justice considerations rather than economics. Newman, however, believes the study demonstrates that the auto-dependent city model is inefficient and grossly inadequate in economic as well as environmental terms. Bicycle use was not included in t
10、he study but Newman noted that the two most bicycle friendly cities considered Amsterdam and Copenhagen were very efficient, even though their public transport systems were reasonable but not special. It is common for supporters of road networks to reject the models of cities with good public transp
11、ort by arguing that such systems would not work in their particular city. One objection is climate. Some people say their city could not make more use of public transport because it is either too hot or too cold. Newman rejects this, pointing out that public transport has been successful in both Tor
12、onto and Singapore and, in fact, he has checked the use of cars against climate and found zero correlation. When it comes to other physical features, road lobbies are on stronger ground. For example, Newman accepts it would be hard for a city as hilly as Auckland to develop a really good rail networ
13、k. However, he points out that both Hong Kong and Zurich have managed to make a success of their rail systems, heavy and light respectively, though there are few cities in the world as hilly. A In fact, Newman believes the main reason for adopting one sort of transport over another is politics: The
14、more democratic the process, the more public transport is favored. He considers Portland, Oregon, a perfect example of this. Some years ago, federal money was granted to build a new road. However, local pressure groups forced a referendum over whether to spend the money on light rail instead. The ra
15、il proposal won and the railway worked spectacularly well. In the years that have followed, more and more rail systems have been put in, dramatically changing the nature of the city. Newman notes that Portland has about the same population as Perth and had a similar population density at the time. B
16、 In the UK, travel times to work had been stable for at least six centuries, with people avoiding situations that required them to spend more than half an hour travelling to work. Trains and cars initially allowed people to live at greater distances without taking longer to reach their destination.
17、However, public infrastructure did not keep pace with urban sprawl, causing massive congestion problems which now make commuting times far higher. C There is a widespread belief that increasing wealth encourages people to live farther out where cars are the only viable transport. The example of Euro
18、pean cities refutes that. They are often wealthier than their American counterparts but have not generated the same level of car use. In Stockholm, car use has actually fallen in recent years as the city has become larger and wealthier. A new study makes this point even more starkly. Developing citi
19、es in Asia, such as Jakarta and Bangkok, make more use of the car than wealthy Asian cities such as Tokyo and Singapore. In cities that developed later, the World Bank and Asian Development Bank discouraged the building of public transport and people have been forced to rely on cars creating the mas
20、sive traffic jams that characterize those cities. D Newman believes one of the best studies on how cities built for cars might be converted to rail use is The Urban Village report, which used Melbourne as an example. It found that pushing everyone into the city centre was not the best approach. Inst
21、ead, the proposal advocated the creation of urban villages at hundreds of sites, mostly around railway stations. E It was once assumed that improvements in telecommunications would lead to more dispersal in the population as people were no longer forced into cities. However, the ISTP teams research
22、demonstrates that the population and job density of cities rose or remained constant in the 1980s after decades of decline. The explanation for this seems to be that it is valuable to place people working in related fields together. The new world will largely depend on human creativity, and creativi
23、ty flourishes where people come together face-to-face. Questions 6-10 Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1? In boxes 6-10 on your answer sheet, write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 剑桥 雅思 阅读 原文 test2 答案 解析
![提示](https://www.taowenge.com/images/bang_tan.gif)
限制150内