避风港对冲:多产业策略.docx
《避风港对冲:多产业策略.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《避风港对冲:多产业策略.docx(27页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、24 January 2019MULTI-ASSETGLOBALPierre BlanchetHead of Multi-Asset StrategyHSBC Bank plc+44 20 7991 5388Duncan TomsMulti-Asset StrategistHSBC Bank plc+44 20 7991 3025Max KettnerMulti-Asset StrategistHSBC Bank plc+44 20 7991 504520%15%10%6E 号a W8XX山Maximum Risk-Return Ratio。一行a5 0 5 02 2 I ISource: H
2、SBC, BloombergVolatility (Std. Deviation)00Last year we saw unusual cross asset behaviour. This led many to ask if the characteristics of havens have changed. We would answer no, and went a step further to rank safe havens on a cross-asset basisThe champions are US Treasuries, JPY and gold, in that
3、orderIt appears the days of historically low volatility are numbered. When vol rises, safe havens may act as an effective hedge when risk assets sell off. Yet, many such assets have failed to protect investors, most prominently USTs in early-18. We therefore put safe havens through their paces to de
4、termine the best safe haven under higher vol.Our analysis focuses on simulating risk-return characteristics - chart 1 is a scatter plot that includes 10 million simulations of various portfolio weightings. From this analysis we find that short-end USTs are our safe haven champions. This is followed
5、by the JPY in second place, and gold gets the bronze medal in third. Hence, despite short-end UST yields broadly rising as the Fed has hiked since 2017, it is clear that their safehaven characteristics snap back during times of market turbulence. Additionally, USTs appear to be the best safe haven f
6、or EUR-based investors too. Meanwhile, we find the CHFs safe-haven status has significantly diminished during the last two years.Hedging risksIn Top 10 risks for 2019 we find investors, top concerns were a Eurozone crisis 2.0 and US corporate margins fall. USTs and the JPY can be used to hedge these
7、 risks.1. Ten million simulations for a basket of US equities, US Treasuries, and JPY-USDEfficient Frontier 25% 3530USTs: short end vs. long end of the curveUp to this point we have given little regard to why we selected the short end of the curve for our analysis as opposed to the long end. Ultimat
8、ely, an investors preference for a certain part of the curve depends on a number of factors, but from a mean-variance standpoint, the short-end of the curve appears more attractive.Purely from a mean-variance standpoint, short-end USTs are preferable to US 10YChart 11 overlays the mean-variance fron
9、tiers of two groups of portfolios. The only difference between these two groups is UST maturity: one group includes the total return of 1-3Y USTs (red data cloud), and another the total return of the 10Y UST instead (grey data cloud). Broadly, the group with 1-3Y USTs has an enhanced efficient front
10、ier beyond that of the group with the 10Y UST. As the highest risk-return ratios across the two data clouds occur in the group with 1-3Y USTs, we can infer that, from a mean-variance standpoint, the short end is more attractive. Only investors with a high level of risk tolerance would choose portfol
11、ios which include the 10Y UST rather than 1-3Y USTs.11. US rates: 1-3Y vs 10Y25%20%15%10%5%0%25%20%15%10%5%0%0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%Volatility Short-end USTs, JPY-USD, S&P US 10Y, JPY-USD, S&P Maximium Risk-Return ratio across all weightings Source: HSBC, BloombergEUR-based investors We ran the equivalen
12、t analysis for a EUR-based investor The results were largely unchanged. .as US Treasuries remained safe-haven championsA different harbour for EUR-based investors?So far weve taken the perspective of a USD-based multi-asset investor. But for a EUR-based investor, the outcome might be different. Howe
13、ver, our analysis shows that its not and the equivalent safe-haven championship draws largely similar conclusions.USTs still safe-haven champions for EUR-based investorsWe used the EUROSTOXX in place of the S&P 500 for equities, filtered for a high level of VSTOXX, in the same way as we filtered for
14、 a high level of VIX, and priced our safe havens in EUR. Here our model found preferences for (1) Schatz, (2) Gold priced in EUR, (3) JPY-EUR, and finally (4) CHF-EUR. However, proving that any great champion can triumph both at home and abroad, USTs are still the winner. Indeed USTs continue to tru
15、mp all of the above, including Schatz, even when short-end USTs are priced in EUR. They remain the number one safe haven.Charts 12-15 display these results. Note that for all max risk-return ratio portfolios (white diamonds), there is a 0% weighting to equities. Chart 12 has a basket of Schatz and J
16、PY-EUR, and we find higher weightings in Schatz for those simulations with the highest risk-reward ratios.12. Basket: EUROSTOXX, Schatz, JPY-EUREfficient FrontierEfficient FrontierVolatility (Std. Deviation)Source: HSBC, BloombergOptimal weighting based on risk-reward (white diamond): 90% Schatz 1-3
17、Y 10% JPY-EURChart 13 has a basket of gold (priced in EUR) and JPY-EUR. As the efficient frontier has shifted right, we can conclude that gold is not as strong a safe-haven asset as Schatz. Given the marginally higher weighting in gold (priced in EUR) for the simulation with the highest riskreward r
18、atio, we can also conclude that gold edges JPY as a better safe-haven asset for a EUR investor.13. Basket: EUROSTOXX, Gold in EUR, JPY-EUREfficient Frontier 20%18%12%10%皿40350%2%4%e%Volatility (Std Deviation)Source: HSBC, Bloomberg10%1000Optimal weighting based on risk-reward (white diamond):58% Gol
19、d (priced in EUR) 42% JPY-EURChart 14 shows once again the CHFs diminished safe-haven status.14. Basket: EUROSTOXX, Gold in EUR, CHF-EUREfficient Frontier 20%18%9%BEnlBa peu&x 山2%Volatilitv (Std Deviation)1005Q0o行a0 5 0 5a2 2 14010%Source: HSBC, BloombergOptimal weighting based on risk-reward (white
20、 diamond): 100% Gold (in EUR) 0%CHF-EURFinally, chart 15 has a basket of USTs (priced in EUR) and JPY-EUR. Due to the yellow, and some red, points indicating higher risk-reward ratios, we can conclude that USTs trump Schatz as the best safe-haven asset, even when priced in EUR.15. Basket: EUROSTOXX,
21、 USTs in EUR, JPY-EUREfficient FrontierVolatolity (Std Devwtjon)Source: HSBC, BloombergOptimal weighting based on risk-reward (white diamond): 89% USTs in EUR 11% JPY-EURWhen looking through charts 12-15, it is striking how the scatter plots present a sea of blue and turquoise points rather than inc
22、luding the yellow and red dots as per all previous mean-variance diagrams. This indicates lower risk-return simulations, and ultimately poorer efficient frontiers, than in the case of USD-priced assets above. With the exception of Schatz, this is therefore likely due to the FX implications of pricin
23、g safe-havens in EUR rather than USD. Such implications are partly a function of a weaker EUR during the period analysed, but more likely a function of the USDs risk-off allure. With the exception of the JPY, the USD is the strongest risk-off currency. Moreover, the USDs current hedging costs also e
24、at into profits for EUR-based investors. And yes, the allure of USTs on a global scale has a large part to play in the USDs risk-off role.So our model does not find a materially different conclusion for a EUR-based investor as opposed to a USD-based investor: US Treasuries are the best safe-haven as
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 避风港 对冲 产业 策略
限制150内