铁和钢生产碳排放量英文用户指南Iron and Steel Version 2.0 Guidance.docx
《铁和钢生产碳排放量英文用户指南Iron and Steel Version 2.0 Guidance.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《铁和钢生产碳排放量英文用户指南Iron and Steel Version 2.0 Guidance.docx(37页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Iron and Steel ProductionA component tool of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol InitiativeJanuary 2008.For additional information please contact Stephen Russell ()3. Coke production4. Flaring3.2.1 Emissions firom Electricity Generation and Reheating FurnacesCO2The
2、calculation of CO2 emissions from Electricity Generation and Reheating Furnaces requires data on the carbon content, heating value and oxidation fraction of the consumed fuel(s). Default, Tier 1 values fbr each of these factors are supplied.The following sections provide information on these factors
3、 and on how the fuel consumption data should be gathered.Fuel Consumption DataEquation 1Facilities need to collate data on the amount of fuel consumed over the reporting year and disaggregate these data by fuel type. These data can come directly from on-site metering of the fuel inputs into the comb
4、ustion units or from the output of these units. Alternatively, the data may be calculated from purchase or delivery records, in which case companies should be careful to account fbr inventory stock changes following Equation 1:Accounting for Changes in Fuel StocksTotal Annual Fuel Consumption = Annu
5、al Fuel Purchases - Annual Fuel Sales + Fuel Stock at Beginning of Year - Fuel Stock at End of YearFuel Carbon Content and Heating ValuesThe carbon content of a fuel is the fraction or mass of carbon atoms relative to the total mass or number of atoms in the fuel; it is thus a measure of the potenti
6、al CO2 emissions from that fbels combustion.The carbon content of a given fuel can show variation over space and time (see Figure 2 for an example). The extent of variation can depend on the units chosen to express the carbon content data - less variability is often seen when the data are expressed
7、on an10energy basis (e.g.9 Kg carbon/MJ or tonnes carbon/ million Btu) compared to a mass or volume basis (e.5 kg C/ Kg fuel). Carbon content values can be converted to energy units using heating or calorific values.Figure 2. Spatial variation in the carbon content of pipeline-quality natural gas in
8、 the U.S.Source: Energy Information Administration (1994), Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 1987-1992.(ruguoqsb) ED 一出 X8 Euwo。uob。A fuefs heating value is the amount of heat released during the combustion of a specified amount of that fuel (example units are MJ/Kg? thousand Btu/lb
9、, and MMBtu/bbl). Two alternative metrics of heating value may be used to adjust carbon content data: lower heating value (LHV; also known as Net Calorific Value (NGV) and higher heating value (HHV; also known as Gross Calorific Value (GCV). These metrics differ in how they consider the different ph
10、ysical states (liquid or gaseous) that water exists in following combustion. The HHV includes the latent energy of condensation of water following combustion, whereas the LHV is obtained by subtracting the heat of vaporization of the water produced by combustion from the higher heating value. More s
11、pecifically:11Equation 2Inter-converting HHV and LHV dataLHV=HHV- 0.21277 -0.0245M -0.0087Where:M = % moistureH = % hydrogenY = percent oxygenA commonly accepted approximation fbr inter-converting LHV and HHV data is to assume that the LHV is 95% of the HHV for solid fuels, such as coal and oil, but
12、 90% of the HHV fbr gaseous fuels, such as natural gas.One benefit of the HHV over the LHV is that the relationship between carbon content and heating values is more direct using the former. This is because the LHV is partly a function of the filer s moisture content, which can vary significantly. I
13、n North America the convention is to use HHV, whereas LHV is used outside North America.Carbon content factors can be converted to an energy scale using heating values with Equation 3:Equation 3Converting carbon content factors from a mass or volume basis to an energy basisFcHVfWhere:Fgh = Carbon co
14、ntent of fuel on a heating value basis (e.g.,short tons carbon / millionBtu or metric tons carbon / GJ)Fc = Carbon content of fuel on a mass or volume basis (e.g.9 short ton carbon / short ton)HVf= Heating value of fuel (e.g.5 MJ/Kg5 thousand Btu/lb or MMBtu/bbl, etc.)To summarize, given the variabi
15、lity that can exist in fuel composition, companies are encouraged to use Tier 35 facility-specific values fbr carbon content and heating values whenever possible. Ideally, the carbon content factors should be expressed on an energy scale using higher heating values. Tier 3 information may be availab
16、le from suppliers or from the Material Safety Data Sheets fbr purchased fuels. Tn case facility-specific values can not be derived, plants may use the Tier 1 default values in Appendix I. Companies may use a mix of plant-specific and default values in a single calculation (e.g.,custom carbon content
17、 factor, but default HHV data). Tier 2 values may be available from national statistical agencies and other national-level organizations.12Fuel Fraction Carbon Oxidation FactorA small fraction of a filer s carbon content can escape oxidation and remain as a solid after combustion in the form of ash
18、or soot (for solid fuels) or particulate emissions (fbr natural gas and other gaseous fuels). This unoxidized fraction is a function of several factors, including fuel type, combustion technology, equipment age, and operating practices. This fraction can be assumed to contribute no further to CO2 em
19、issions, so it is easily corrected fbr in estimating CO2 emissions. The stationary combustion CO2 methods in this tool use an oxidation factor9 to account fbr the unoxidised fraction (where 1.00 = complete oxidation). In general, variability in the oxidation factor is low fbr gaseous and liquid fuel
20、s, but can be much larger for solid fuels. For example, an Australian study of coal-fired boilers found that the oxidation factor ranged from 0.99 - 0.88 (IPCC9 2006).The preferred approach for developing a Tier 3 facility-specific oxidation factor is to measure the quantity of residual solid left o
21、ver from the combustion process and then analyze that residues carbon content. However, if this is not possible a Tier 1 default value of 1.00 can be assumed.Calculating CO? EmissionsEquation 4Facilities should first ensure that all units are consistent with each other (Appendix III provides unit co
22、nversion ratios). Facilities are encouraged to express any Tier 2/3 carbon content data on an energy basis using HHV values, before using Equation 4 to calculate the emissions. Otherwise, when these data are expressed on a mass or volume basis, Equation 5 should be used. Default, Tier 1 values for u
23、se with Equations 4 and 5 are given in Appendix I.Calculating CO2 emissions using carbon content data that are expressed on a mass or volume basis44E = Af F F fC,V OX OMass basis:1244Volume basis:E = Af m F()x 一Where:E = Amount of CO2 emitted (metric tons)Av= Volume of fuel consumed (e.g.9 liters, g
24、allons, m3, etc.)A工机=Mass of fuel consumed (e.g.9 kg, short ton, etc.)FCfV = Carbon content of fuel on a volume basis (e.g.9 short tons carbon / gallon)Fc,m = Carbon content of fuel on a mass basis (e.g., short tons carbon / short ton) Fox= Fraction oxidation factor44/12 = The ratio of the molecular
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 铁和钢生产碳排放量英文用户指南Iron and Steel Version 2.0 Guidance 生产 排放量 英文 用户指南 Iron
链接地址:https://www.taowenge.com/p-86438357.html
限制150内