语言心理学学习.pptx

《语言心理学学习.pptx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《语言心理学学习.pptx（43页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、ContentsIntroduction Comprehension of DiscourseMemory for DiscourseSchemata and Discourse ProcessingEducational Implications第1页/共43页IntroductionThis chapter deals with the ways we comprehend and remember units of language longer than the sentencethat is,connected discourse.Research on discourse has

2、grown significantly in recent decades,for several reasons.We rarely speak in isolated sentence,discourse seems to be a more natural unit of language to investigate.Sentences are ambiguous or obscure apart from their discourse context.Discourse provides a rich source of material for those interested

3、in the cognitive processes used in language.第2页/共43页Comprehension of discourseTitleLocal and global discourse structureStrategies used to establish coherenceCohesionSummaryRole of working memory第3页/共43页Local and global discourse structureComprehension of connected discourse depends less on the meani

4、ng of the individual sentences than on their arrange-ment.Indeed,it is entirely possible for a group of mean-ingful sentences to be thrown together in a way that makes no sense at all.e.g.Carlos arranged to take golf lessons from the local pro-fessional.His dog,a cocker spaniel,was expecting pups ag

5、ain.Andrea had the car washed for the big wedding.She expected Carlos to help her move into her new apartment.第4页/共43页Local and global discourse structureJohn bought a cake at the bake shop.The cake was chocolate with white frosting and it was read“Happy birthday,Joan”in red letters.John was particu

6、larly pleased with the lettering.He brought it over to Gregs house,and together they worked on the rest of details.John bought a cake at the bake shop.The birthday card was signed by all of the employees.The party went on until after midnight.第5页/共43页Local and global discourse structureThe contrast

7、between the last two passages illustrates an important point that we must look beneath the surface to understand discourse structure.Superficially,the last passage is incomplete,but the overall result in readers minds may be quite complete.The three passages discussed illustrate two levels of dis-co

8、urse structure.1.Local structure:in the relationships between individual sentences in the discourse.2.Global structure:it is our knowledge of the structure corresponding to the topic that enables us to comprehend and remember the shorter passage about the topic.第6页/共43页Cohesion At the local level,a

9、discourse is coherent if there are semantic relationships between successive sentences.Halliday and Hason define cohesion as referring to“the range of possibilities that exist for linking something with what has gone before”.1.Categories of cohesion 2.Anaphoric and cataphoric reference第7页/共43页Catego

10、ries of cohesionPronominal DemonstrativeComparative SubstitutionEllipsisConjunction Lexical ReiterationSynonymHyponym第8页/共43页Anaphoric and cataphoric referenceCohesion consists of relating some current expression to one encountered earlier.This is called anaphoric refer-ence.When we use an expressio

11、n to refer back to some-thing previously mentioned in discourse,the referring expression is called an anaphor,and the previous refer-ent is called an antecedent.One of these forms of cohesion anaphoric reference has commanded the great interest among psychologists.There are two reasons in it.One rea

12、son is that anaphoric reference enables us to explore the role of working memory in discourse com-prehension.The other reason is that anaphoric reference illuminates the role of communicative conventions in discourse.第9页/共43页Strategies used to establish coherenceGiven information It refers to inform

13、ation that an author or speaker assumes the reader or listener already knows,whereas new infor-mation is information that the comprehender is assumed to not know.e.g.It was Steve who robbed the bank.It was the bank that Steve robbed.第10页/共43页Strategies used to establish coherenceGiven/New strategy C

14、lark and Haviland suggest that readers expect authors to use given information to refer to information the readers already know or can identify and to use new information to refer to concepts with which they are not already familiar.Three stages about this strategy 1)Identifying the given and new in

15、formation in the current sentence.2)Finding an antecedent in memory for the given information 3)attaching the new information to this spot in memory.第11页/共43页Strategies used to establish coherenceDirecting matching The simplest case is surely study that in which the given information in the target s

16、entence directly matches an antecedent in the context sentence.And in comprehending the target sentence,we first divide it into given and new information.Even though direct matches are the simple case of sentence relations,they are not so simple that they can be reduced to merely searching for a spe

17、cific word.Find an antecedent for given information in a target sentence resembles sear-ching for a concept more than searching for a word.So when we speak of direct speeches,we are talking of match-es of underlying concepts previously introduced into the discourse.第12页/共43页Strategies used to establ

18、ish coherenceBridging In some cases,we dont have a direct antecedent for the given information but can still tie the sentences together.The contrast between bridging and direct matching 1)Last Christmas Eugene went to a lot of parties.This Christmas he got very drunk again.2)Last Christmas Eugene go

19、t absolutely smashed.This Christmas he got very drunk again.Haviland and Clark have shown that require bridges take longer to comprehend than those for which there is a direct match of antecedents.第13页/共43页Strategies used to establish coherenceReinstating old information I am trying to find a black

20、dog.He is a short and has a dog tag on his neck that says Fred.Yesterday that dog bit a little girl.She was scared,but she wasnt really hurt.Yesterday a black dog bit a little girl.It got away,and we are still trying to find it.He is short and a dog tag on his neck that says Fred.She was scared,but

21、she wasnt really hurt.When a sentence refers to some-thing or someone already intro-duced but no longer in the fore-ground the comprehender must reinstate information that is to be matched with the target in-formation.第14页/共43页Strategies used to establish coherenceIdentifying new topics of discourse

22、 All of these strategies share the implicit assumption that part of a target sentence should relate to earlier infor-mation,but sometimes the information is all new and the target is meant to establish a new topic of discourse.The new information is generally taken as an elaboration,sometimes a smal

23、l detail,of the given information.Once introduced,this new information may itself serve as an antecedent for later sentences,which are subordinated to it.The natural result of this integration process is a hier-archical structure in episodic memory.第15页/共43页Role of working memoryAs with other aspect

24、s of language,individual experiences and abilities vary.Because the process we have been des-cribing in this section deals with the operation of working memory,it would be reasonable to expect that individual differences in working memory might influence how we comprehend discourse.Daneman and Carpe

25、nter distinguish between the storage and processing function of working memory.The limited resources of working memory are allocated to processing certain tasks as well as to temporarily storing the results of these tasks.第16页/共43页Role of working memoryWorking memory capacity,of course,is not the on

26、ly individual characteristics that influences discourse com-prehension.Another is the background knowledge that the individual may have of the subject matter in the passage.When we encounter unfamiliar passages,it is more diffi-cult to draw appropriate inferences.In contrast,when we have the informa

27、tion in permanent memory that helps us interpret the information,its easier to draw inferences.第17页/共43页Summary A discourse is coherent if its elements are easily related to one another.At the local or microstructural,coherence is achieved primarily through the appropriate use of cohesive ties betwe

28、en sentences.The given/new strategy specifies a three-stage process of comprehending sentences in discourse.And comprehen-sion is impeded when there is no antecedent,forcing us to form a bridging inference,or when the antecedent was not recent,forcing us to reinstate the antecedent.第18页/共43页Memory f

29、or discoursePropositional representations Summary Simultaneous investigation of all three levelsSituational modelsSurface representations第19页/共43页Surface representations Surface representation:we remember the exact words that we encountered.One early study that suggested that surface represen-tation

30、s of discourse are very short-lived presented indi-viduals with a long oral passage that was interrupted at irregular intervals.And some researchers found that the surface or verbatim form of a sentence is stored in working memory only until its meaning is understood,then purged to make room for the

31、 next sentence.第20页/共43页Propositional representationsPropositional representation:It specifies the meaning apart from the exact words used.If we indeed purge working memory of the exact wording.What is left is the propositional structure of a sentence.Evidence for the psychological reality of propos

32、itions comes from Kintsch and Keenan(1973),who showed that the number of propositions influences the time required to read a passage when preparing to recall it.The most interesting aspect of Mckoon and Ratcliffs study is their two definitions of close:the number of intervening words in the surface

33、structure versus the number of intervening propositions in the discourse structure.第21页/共43页Propositional representations Interferences and propositional representations Inferences are not mere recall errors,nor are they random,spurious contributions by imaginative readers.Inferences are intrinsic t

34、o discourse structure.Authors leave out information that they think readers will be able to figure out.Mckoon and Ratcliff conclude,on the basis of a number of studies,that we automatically draw inferences during reading only when two conditions are present.One con-dition is the one we have been dis

35、cussing:The inference must be necessary to make a context locally coherent.Their second condition is that the information on which the inference is must easily activated.第22页/共43页Propositional representationsKintsch explains the results by appealing the two levels of representation we have discussed

36、:a short-term surface representation that decays is otherwise lost very quickly and a long-term propositional representation.Implicit propositions have only a propositional representation,and it is assumed that consulting a surface representation is quicker than retrieving a propositional representa

37、tion.第23页/共43页Situational modelsSituational models represent the state affairs that a text refers to.That is,the assumption is that as comprehend the propositions of a text,we construct a mental or situational model of the world as described by the text.Furthermore,the construction of a situational

38、model influences the accessibility of previous information in discourse.第24页/共43页Simultaneous investigations of all three levelsMost of the studies we have discussed to this point have attempt to isolate one of these levels.However,its also helpful to set up a study that attempts to investigate how

39、each of the levels operates in the same experiment.In Kintschs study,we see that surface memory is strong only in the immediate test and falls to chance level shortly after that propositional recognition starts stronger,and falls over time.But memory for situations is initially very strong and shows

40、 little loss over retention intervals studied.第25页/共43页SummaryWe store discourse in three wayssurface representations,propositional representations,and situational modelsand each appears to be influenced by different variables and subject to different decay rates.Surface representations are short-li

41、ved except when the wording is pragmatically significant.Propositional representations are much better retained and include the meaning of presented information along with any inferences we have drawn.Situational models are retained the best and are based on spatial or casual relations between parts

42、 of text.第26页/共43页Schemata and discourse processingTitleschemataGenres SummaryNarrative discourse processingInaccessibility of knowledge第27页/共43页Schemata and discourse processingA schema(plural:schemata)is a structure in a semantic memory that specifies the general or expected arrange-ment of a body

43、 of information.It is generally associated with the early work on the story recall by Barlett.Barlett attempted to show that remembering is not a rote or repro-ductive process but rather a process in which we retain the overall gist of an event and then reconstruct the details from this overall impr

44、ession.第28页/共43页Activation of appropriate schemataSome researchers show that comprehension and memory are poor when we do not have a schema that corresponds to the story that is unfolding,because it is nearly im-possible to see the significance of the events being described.But in other instances,we

45、 may have an appropriate schema in memory but fail to activate it for one reason or another.Some researchers have convincingly demonstrat-ed that comprehension and memory will be poor when the passage is written so obscurely that we cant determine what might be the right schema.第29页/共43页Reconstructi

46、on of schema-specific detailsOne of Barletts notions was the activated schema served as a retrieval plan,summoning up certain details rather than others by virtue of their centrality to the schema.Some researchers made some tests.Through these tests,they provide evidence of the directive function of

47、 schema in discourse processing.It is clear that the schema that is in effect during comprehension has a powerful organizing effect on recall.Moreover,information central to the schema is well remembered,but other details seem to be misplaced,although they can be revived with a shift perspective.All

48、 told,the evidence that schemata influence discourse processing is quite impressive.第30页/共43页Genres Genres are important because they provide us with general expectations regarding the way information in a discourse will be arranged.One genre that has been studied a great deal in discourse research

49、has been narrative discourse.Typically,stories begin with the introduction of characters and setting.Narrative discourse can be contrasted with expository discourse,in which the goal of the writer is not to tell a story but rather to convey information about the subject matter.第31页/共43页Narrative dis

50、course processingStory grammars A story grammar is a schema in semantic memory that identifies the typical or expected arrangement of events in a story.In general,story grammars view narratives as consisting of a setting,one or more episodes,and then an ending.Episodes have a characteristic structur