考研英语翻译题目.pdf
《考研英语翻译题目.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考研英语翻译题目.pdf(51页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、第一部分英译汉全真试题UnitlAccording to the new school of scientists,technology is an overlooked force in expandingthe horizons of scientific knowledge.(71)Science moves forward,they say,nol so much Iheoughthe insights of great men of genius as because of more ordinary things like improved techniquesand tools.
2、(72)“In short”,a leader of the new school contends,“the scientific revolution,as wncall it,was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments thatexpanded the reach of science in innumerable directions.”(73)Over the years,tools and technology themselves as a source of funda
3、mental innovationhave largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science.The modern school that hailstechnology argues that such masters as Galileo,Newton,Maxwell,Einstein,and inventors suchas Edison attached great importance to,and derived great benefit from,craft information andtechnol
4、ogical devices of different kinds that were usable in scientific experiments.The centerpiece of the argument of a technologies,genius no advocate was an analysis ofGalileo,s role at the start of the scientific revolution.The wisdom of the day was derived fromPtolemy,an astronomer of the second centu
5、ry,whose elaborate system of the sky put Earth at thecenter of all heavenly motions.(74)Galileos greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the firstperson to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolvearound the sun rather than around the Earth.But the real hero o
6、f the story,according to the newschool of scientists,was the long evolution in the improvement of machinery for makingeyeglasses.Federal policy is necessarily involved in the technology vs.genius dispute.(75)Whether theGovernment should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of techno
7、logy or viceversa(反之)often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.W文 都 教 育 无限精彩人生 文都铸就永恒Unit 2The standardized educational or psychological tests that are widely used to aid in selecting,classifying,assigning,or promoting students,employees,and military personnel have been thetar
8、get of recent attacks in books,magazines,the daily press,and even in Congress.(71)The targetis wrong,for in attacking the tests,critics divert attention from the fault that lies with ill informedor incompetent users.The tests themselves are merely tools,with characteristics that can bemeasured with
9、reasonable precision under specified conditions.Whether the results will bevaluable,meaningless,or even misleading depends partly upon the tool itself but largely upon theuser.All informed predictions of future performance are based upon some knowledge of relevantpast performance:school grades,resea
10、rch productivity,sales records,or whatever is appropriate.(72)How well the predictions will be validated by later performance depends upon the amount,reliability,and appropriateness of the information used and on the skill and wisdom with which itis interpreted.Anyone who keeps careful score knows t
11、hat the information available is alwaysincomplete and that the predictions are always subject to error.Standardized tests should be considered in this context.They provide a quick objectivemethod of getting some kinds of information about what a person learned,the skills he hasdeveloped,or the kind
12、of person he is.The information so obtained has,qualitatively,the sameadvantages and shortcomings as other kinds of information.(73)Whclhnr lo use tests,other kindsof information,or both in a particular situation depends,therefore,upon the evidence fromexperience concerning comparative validity and
13、upon such factors as cost and availability.(74)In general,the tests work most effectively when the qualities t。be measured can bemost precisely defined and least effectively when what is to be measured o predicated can not bewell defined.Properly used,they provide a rapid means of getting comparable
14、 information aboutmany people.Sometimes they identify students whose high potential has not been previouslyrecognized,but there are many things they do not do.(75)Foe example,they do not compensatefor gross social inequality,and thus do not tell how able an underprivileged youngster might havebeen h
15、ad he grown up under morn favorable circumstances.2 Unit 3The differences in relative growth of various areas of scientific research have several causes.(71)Some of these causes are completely reasonable results of social needs.Others arereasonable consequences of particular advances in science bein
16、g to some extent selfaccelerating.Some,however,are less reasonable processes of different growth in which preconceptions of theform scientific theory ought to take,by persons in authority,act to alter the growth pattern ofdifferent areas.This is a new problem probably not yet unavoidable;but it is a
17、 frightening trend.(72)This trend began during the Second World War,when several governments came to theconclusion that the specific demands that a government wants to make of its scientificestablishment cannot generally be foreseen in detail.It can be predicted,however,that from timeto time,questio
18、ns will arise which will require specific scientific answers.It is therefore generallyvaluable to treat the scientific establishment as a resource or machine to be kept in functionalorder.(73)This seems mostly effectively done by supporting a curtain amount of research notrelated to immediate goals
19、but of possible consequence in the future.This kind of support,like all government support,requires decisions about the appropriaterecipients of funds.Decisions based on utility as opposed to lack of utility are straight forward.But a decision among projects none of which has immediate utility is mo
20、re difficult.The goal ofthe supporting agencies is the praisable one of supporting good as opposed to bad”science,buta valid determination is difficult to make.Generally,the idea of good science tends to becomeconfused with the capacity of the field in question to generate an elegant theory.(74)Howe
21、ver,the world is so made that elegant systems are in principle unable to deal with some of Ihe worldsmore fascinating and delightful aspects.(75)New forms of thought as well as new subjects forthought must arise in the future as they have in the past,giving rise to new standards of elegance.Unit 4Do
22、 animals have rights?This is how the question is usually put.It sounds like a useful,ground-clearing way to start.(71)Actually,it isnt,because it assumes that there is an agreedaccount of human rights,which is something the world does not have.On one view of rights,to be sure,it necessarily follows
23、that animals have none.72)Somephilosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract,as part of an exchange of dutiesW文 都 教 育 无限精彩人生 文都铸就永恒and entitlements.Therefore,animals cannot have rights.The idea of punishing a tiger that killssomebody is absurd,for exactly the same reason,so is th
24、e idea that tigers have rights.However,this is only one account,and by no means an uncontested one.It denies rights not only to animalsbut also to some peoplefor instance,to infants,the mentally incapable and future generations.In addition,it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who
25、never consented to it:howdo you reply to somebody who says I don?t like this contract?”The point is this without agreement on the rights of people,arguing about the rights ofanimals is fruitless.(73)It leads Ihe discussion to extremes at(he outset:it invites you to Ihink thatanimals should be treate
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考研 英语翻译 题目
限制150内