05+新高考I卷阅读理解ABCD(2023年)真题透析+变式训练.docx
《05+新高考I卷阅读理解ABCD(2023年)真题透析+变式训练.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《05+新高考I卷阅读理解ABCD(2023年)真题透析+变式训练.docx(35页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、05新高考I卷阅读理解ABCD (2023年)真题透析+变式训练第一部分命题分析+秒选技能第二部分真题评析(真题呈现+全解全析+阅读高频词+长难句回顾)第三部分真题变式练命题分析阅读理解文章体裁可以分为:应用文 记叙文 说明文 议论文虽然阅读理解的材料内容千变万化,但考试中的考查方式是有限的,只要能够掌握以下几种主要类型题目 的阅读技巧,那么阅读理解拿高分,甚至拿满分就是可以做到的了。阅读理解题的速选技能,需要结合下面几种题型:主旨大意题,细节理解题,推理判断题,词义猜测题。 近三年高考阅读理解题,细节题占有较大比例,难度一般不大,答案大都可以从文章中直接找到依据;推 理判断题呈不断上升的趋势
2、,且已由过去简单的对号入座直接答题转向通过语句的同义或反义转换来考查 考生对英语语言的理解能力,因此难度比往年有所增加;主旨题的考查占有十分重要的位置,一般针对某 一语段或某一语篇的主题、标题或目的设题,这类题目考查的范围是基本论点、文章标题、主题或段落大 意等;词义题所要求的词或词组往往是熟词新意,有的是中学课本中没出现过的,仅考查词或短语在该篇 短文中的含义;观点态度题也在高考中有所体现。秒选技能词汇层面巧跨生词障碍:在阅读过程中,对于无关紧要的词汇要学着“跳过去 比如人名、地名、组织名等。对影响阅读质量、 影响解题的关键生词要“猜出来,句意层面巧破长难句型对于阅读中设题处的长难句要学会分
3、析。分析长难句的核心技法是根据五种基本句式摘出句子主干 主谓(宾),特别注意:1 .一个句子有且只有一个谓语,如果一个句子有了两个或两个以上的谓语,则必有连词或从句的出现;2 .去除所有修饰成分,包括介词短语、非谓语动词、从句等;3 ,充分利用并列成分。语篇层面熟悉体裁特点不同类型的语篇有不同的(命题)特点。考虑语篇,要考虑语篇的体裁、发展线索、框架结构、语篇的立 论句等。我将借鉴我在2018年进行的一项实验,在该实验中,1600多人同意进行数字清理厂可推知,第一部分的最 后一章介绍了实验与数字清理的实际例子。故选C。31.【答案】A【解析】推理判断题。通过文章最后一段“You can vie
4、w these practices as a toolbox meant to aid your efforts to build a minimalist lifestyle that words for your particular circumstances.(你可以将这些实践视为一个工具箱,旨 在帮助你建立一种适合自己特定情况的极简主义生活方式)“可推知,作者建议读者根据需要与实际情况使用 第二部分中提及的实践。故选A。阅读高频词1 .detailed adj,详细的;2 .exploration n探讨,研究;work v奏效,起作用;3 .examination n 研究,考察;
5、4.increasingly adv 越来越多地;1.1 ntolerable adj.无法忍受的;6 .conclude v.学术词结束;7 .optional adj.学术词可选择的;8 .massive adj,大量的;9 .value v.名词动化重视,珍视;10 .runv.熟词生义组织;11 .perform v.执行;12 .participant n.学术词参与者;13 .trapn.陷阱,困境;14 .encounter v.学术词遭遇(尤指问题);15 .sustainable adj.学术诩可持续的;16 .mindless adj.毫无目标的,无须动脑筋的;17 .pr
6、actice n 实践,做法;18 . advocate v.学术词提倡;19 .promote v.学术词促进;20 . present v.熟词生义描述;21 .make thecase for为阐明理由;22 .move on to开始做(别的事);23 .step away from 不靠近,远离;24 . carry out 实施,执行;25 .draw on 利用;26 .be designed to do sth 目的是做某事;27 .act on根据行事;28 .view.as 将看作;29 .be meant to do sth 旨在做某事;30 .be aimed at旨在
7、,目的是;长难句回顾30.1 part one, I describe the philosophical foundations of digital minimalism, starting with an examination of the forces that are making so many peoples digital lives increasingly intolerable, before moving on to a detailed discussion of the digital minimalism philosophy.【句意】在第一部分中,我论述了数字
8、极简主义的哲学基础,首先探讨了到底是什么样的力量使得许多人 的数字生活越来越难以忍受,然后对数字极简主义生活准则进行详细讨论。【解析】starting with为分词结构作状语;that引导定语从句,修饰先行词forces。2 . At the end of the thirty days, you will then add back a small number of carefully chosen online activities that you believe will provide massive benefits to the things you value.【句意】在这
9、三十天结束时.,你可以恢复少量精心挑选的,你认为将对你所珍视的东西大有裨益的线上活 动。【解析】that引导定语从句,修饰先行词online activities; you value为省略了引导词的定语从句,修饰先行 词 the things o3 .Youll hear these participants* stories and learn what strategies worked well for them, and what traps they encountered that you should avoid.【句意】你将了解到这些参与者的故事,知悉哪些策略对他们有效,以及
10、他们遇到了哪些你应当避免的陷 阱。【解析】learn后有两个由what引导的宾语从句,that引导定语从句,修饰先行词tiaps。4 .In these chapters, I examine issues such as the importance of solitude and the necessity of cultivating high-quality leisure to replace the time most now spend on mindless device use.【句意】在这些章节中,我探讨了独处的重要性,以及培养高质量休闲活动的必要性等问题,以取代现在 大多
11、数人漫无目的地使用电子设备而花费的时间。【解析】most now spend on .为省略了引导词的定语从句,修饰先行词the time, most意为“大多数人” (2023年新高考I卷)D篇阅读理解说明文真题呈才阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出最佳选项。On March 7, 1907, the English statistician Francis Galton published a paper which illustrated what has come to be known as the “wisdom of crowds“ effect. The e
12、xperiment of estimation he conducted showed that in some cases, the average of a large number of independent estimates could be quite accurate.This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors arent always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and some to unde
13、restimate. When enough of these eiTors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are similar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors wont cancel each other out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that peoples e
14、stimates be independent. If for whatever reasons, peoples errors become correlated or dependent, the accuracy of the estimate will go down.But a new study led by Joaquin Navajas offered an interesting twist (转折)on this classic phenomenon. The key finding of the study was that when crowds were furthe
15、r divided into smaller groups that were allowed to have a discussion, the averages from these groups were more accurate than those from an equal number of independent individuals. For instance, the average obtained from the estimates of four discussion groups of five was significantly more accurate
16、than the average obtained from 20 independent individuals.In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow th
17、ose least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasnt the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they shared arguments and reasoned together.Somehow, these arguments and reasoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led
18、by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.32. What is paragraph 2 of the text mainly about?A. The methods of estimation.B. The underlying logic of the effect.C. The causes of peoples errors.D. The design of
19、Galtons experiment.33. Navajas9 study found that the average accuracy could increase even if.A. the crowds were relatively smallC. individuals did not communicate34. What did the follow-up study focus on?A. The size of the groups.B. there were occasional underestimatesD. estimates were not fully ind
20、ependentB. The dominant members.C. The discussion process.D. The individual estimates.35. What is the authors attitude toward Navajas9 studies?A. Unclear. B. Dismissive. C. Doubtful. D. Approving.全解全析【篇章解读】本文是一篇说明文。没有人是一座孤岛,文章陈述了“群体智慧”效应。实验表明,在某些情况 下大量独立估计的平均值可能是相当准确的。32 .【答案】B【解析】段落大意题。根据第二段内容“This
21、 effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors arent always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and come to underestimate. When enough of these errors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are simi
22、lar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors wont cancel each other out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that peoples estimates be independent. If for whatever reasons, people s errors become correlated or dependent, the accuracy of the estimate will go down.(这种效应利用
23、 了 这样个事实,即当人们犯 错误时,这些错误并不总是相同的。有些人常常会高估,或者低估。当这些误差中有足够多的误差被平均 在一起时,它们会相互抵消,从而产生更准确的估计。如果相似的人倾向于犯同样的错误,那么他们的错 误不会相互抵消。从更专业的角度来说,群众的智慧要求人们的估计是独立的。如果由于任何原因,人们 的错误变得相关或依赖,估计的准确性就会下降)“可知,本段阐述了人们所犯的错误不总是相同的,各不相 同的误差平均在一起,相互抵消就会产生更准确的估计,讨论了独立估计的平均如何由于误差的消除而产 生更准确的预测。因此本段主要解释了“群体智慧”效应这一现象的基本逻辑。故选B。33 .【答案】D
24、【答案】细节理解题。根据第二段的“In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that peoples estimates be ind印endent.(从更专业的角度来说,群众的智慧要求人们的估计是独立的广和第三段的“The key finding of the study was that when crowds were further divided into smaller groups that were allowed to have a discussion, the averages from these gr
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 05 新高 阅读 理解 ABCD 2023 透析 训练
限制150内