考点26 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意(核心考点精讲精练)-备战2024年高考英语一轮复习(教师版).docx
《考点26 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意(核心考点精讲精练)-备战2024年高考英语一轮复习(教师版).docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《考点26 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意(核心考点精讲精练)-备战2024年高考英语一轮复习(教师版).docx(54页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、考点26 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意(核心考点精讲精练)1. 2021-2023年三年高考真题考点分布考点题型段落大意阅读理解2023 试卷类型设问考点2023浙江1月高考C篇31What can we learn from the last paragraph?段落大意2023新高考I卷 D篇32.What is Paragraph 2 of the text mainly about?段落大意20222022新高考I卷阅读D14. What is paragraph 5 mainly about?段落大意2022全国甲卷 D阅读D32. What is the first paragrap
2、h mainly about?段落大意20212021年全国乙卷B篇24. What does paragraph 2 mainly tell us about mobile phones?段落大意2021年6月浙江卷 C篇10. What is the last paragraph mainly about?段落大意2. 命题规律及备考策略【命题规律】近3年新高考卷对于阅读理解中段落大意的考查共计6次,主要考查:根据阅读文章中的某一段落,概括段落大意。概括段落大意的方法:1.利用主题句;2.没有主题句,总结段落大意。【备考策略】系统归类段落大意的总结方法,尤其是主题句、同义句表达的技巧;熟练
3、掌握阅读技能。【命题预测】2024年阅读理解对段落大意的考查仍然是重点。【2024年高考命题预测】主旨大意之段落大意考点是高考中的必考点。一篇文章有多个段落,为什么把题出在其中的某个段落?因为这个段落在文章中起着至关重要的作用,这些段落或引出话题或承上启下或总结全文。命题者的意图是明确的,他们着眼于文章中起重要作用的段落进而设题。预测在2024高考中,段落大意题会继续在高考阅读理解中呈现。【主旨大意之段落大意考点指南】段落大意题常考问题: The main point /idea of the passage is The passage is mainly about The passage
4、 mainly discusses The last but one paragraph is chiefly concerned with? Which of the following statements best expresses the main idea of the passage?近几年高考段落大意考查的特点:考查的段落一般没有主题句,这需要考生对整段进行归纳,找出段落的重点,总结段落大意。 2023新高考全国卷DOn March 7, 1907, the English statistician Francis Galton published a paper which
5、illustrated what has come to be known as the“wisdom of crowds” effect. The experiment of estimation he conducted showed that in some cases,the average of a large number of independent estimates could be quite accurate.This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors are
6、nt always the same. Some people will tend to overestimate, and some to underestimate. When enough of these errors are averaged together, they cancel each other out, resulting in a more accurate estimate. If people are similar and tend to make the same errors, then their errors wont cancel each other
7、 out. In more technical terms, the wisdom of crowds requires that peoples estimates be independent. If for whatever reasons, peoples errors become correlated or dependent,the accuracy of the estimate will go down.But a new study led by Joaquin Navajas offered an interesting twist(转折) on this classic
8、 phenomenon. The key finding of the study was that when crowds were further divided into smaller groups that were allowed to have a discussion, the averages from these groups were more accurate than those from an equal number of independent individuals. For instance, the average obtained from the es
9、timates of four discussion groups of five was significantly more accurate than the average obtained from 20 independent individuals.In a follow-up study with 100 university students, the researchers tried to get a better sense of what the group members actually did in their discussion. Did they tend
10、 to go with those most confident about their estimates? Did they follow those least willing to change their minds? This happened some of the time, but it wasnt the dominant response. Most frequently, the groups reported that they“shared arguments and reasoned together.”Somehow, these arguments and r
11、easoning resulted in a global reduction in error. Although the studies led by Navajas have limitations and many questions remain, the potential implications for group discussion and decision-making are enormous.()32.What is Paragraph 2 of the text mainly about?A.The methods of estimation.B.The under
12、lying logic of the effect. C.The causes of peoples errors.D.The design of Galtons experiment.【文章大意】 本文是一篇说明文。文章介绍了两项关于“群体智慧”效应的研究。32.B段落大意题。根据第二段内容“This effect capitalizes on the fact that when people make errors, those errors arent always the samethe accuracy of the estimate will go down.”可知,本段阐述了人
13、们所犯的错误不总是相同的,各不相同的误差平均在一起,相互抵消,就会产生更准确的估计,独立估计的平均因误差的消除而产生更准确的预测。因此本段主要解释了“群体智慧”效应这一现象的基本逻辑。故选B。【总结段落大意】【2023年1月浙江卷】CA machine can now not only beat you at chess, it can also outperform you in debate. Last week, in a public debate in San Francisco, a software program called Project Debater beat its
14、human opponents, including Noa Ovadia, Israels former national debating champion. Brilliant though it is, Project Debater has some weaknesses. It takes sentences from its library of documents and prebuilt arguments and strings them together. This can lead to the kinds of errors no human would make.
15、Such wrinkles will no doubt be ironed out, yet they also point to a fundamental problem. As Kristian Hammond, professor of electrical engineering and computer science at Northwestern University, put it: “Theres never a stage at which the system knows what its talking about.”What Hammond is referring
16、 to is the question of meaning, and meaning is central to what distinguishes the least intelligent of humans from the most intelligent of machines. A computer works with symbols. Its program specifies a set of rules to transform one string of symbols into another. But it does not specify what those
17、symbols mean. Indeed, to a computer, meaning is irrelevant. Humans, in thinking, talking, reading and writing, also work with symbols. But for humans, meaning is everything. When we communicate, we communicate meaning. What matters is not just the outside of a string of symbols, but the inside too,
18、not just how they are arranged but what they mean. Meaning emerges through a process of social interaction, not of computation, interaction that shapes the content of the symbols in our heads. The rules that assign meaning lie not just inside our heads, but also outside, in society, in social memory
19、, social conventions and social relations. It is this that distinguishes humans from machines. And thats why, however astonishing Project Debater may seem, the tradition that began with Socrates and Confucius will not end with artificial intelligence.31What can we learn from the last paragraph?ASoci
20、al interaction is key to understanding symbols.BThe human brain has potential yet to be developed.CAncient philosophers set good examples for debaters.DArtificial intelligence ensures humans a bright future.【文章大意】本文是一篇新闻报道,主要介绍的是在辩论中战胜人类的名为Project Debater的软件程序。31段落大意题。根据最后一段的“Meaning emerges through
21、 a process of social interaction, not of computation, interaction that shapes the content of the symbols in our heads. The rules that assign meaning lie not just inside our heads, but also outside, in society, in social memory, social conventions and social relations.(意义的产生是通过社会互动的过程,而不是计算的过程,这种互动塑造
22、了我们头脑中符号的内容。赋予意义的规则不仅存在于我们的头脑中,也存在于社会之外,存在于社会记忆、社会习俗和社会关系中。)”可知,从最后一段我们能了解到社会互动是理解符号的关键。故选A。规律方法:如何总结段落大意?段落大意即某一段的中心思想,通常中心思想会在首句体现出来,这就是常说的段落主题句。主题句具有鲜明的概括性,句子结构简单,段落中其他句子均用来解释、支撑或扩展主题句所表达的主题思想。主题句通常位于段首,也可位于段尾、段中。有时作者没有写出明显的主题句,要学会根据段落内容去概括主题句。【2023届安徽省A10联盟高考最后一卷】When I was a kid, a sycamore (枫树
23、) grew in front of my home. At the age of 10, I was just tall enough to reach its lowest branch and lift myself into its embrace. Sometimes two or three of my friends would join me in the sycamore, or in the maple down the street, or Mrs. DiMarcos old peach tree, some of whose stout horizontal branc
24、hes allowed us to sit shoulder to shoulder, eating sweet fruit.In my small town there are some kinds of trees, their branches spreading wide, open for business. But I have not yet seen a climber. Perhaps computer games have replaced tree climbing, or maybe the activity went the way of monkey bars, w
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 考点26 阅读理解主旨大意之段落大意核心考点精讲精练-备战2024年高考英语一轮复习教师版 考点 26 阅读 理解 主旨 大意 段落 核心 精练 备战 2024 年高 英语 一轮 复习 教师版
链接地址:https://www.taowenge.com/p-96338463.html
限制150内