弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗新进展 ppt课件.ppt
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_1.gif)
![资源得分’ title=](/images/score_05.gif)
《弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗新进展 ppt课件.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗新进展 ppt课件.ppt(47页珍藏版)》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、弥漫大弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤细胞淋巴瘤治疗新进展治疗新进展 张翼鷟张翼鷟天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院血液科天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室 概述概述 流行病学流行病学 基于分子基于分子生物学生物学改变改变的的预后评价预后评价 治疗进展治疗进展 初治的初治的DLBCL 难治复发的难治复发的DLBCL 新药临床试验新药临床试验概述流行病学流行病学弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤:31%滤泡性淋巴瘤:22%边缘区淋巴瘤:8%套细胞淋巴瘤:6%小细胞淋巴瘤 7%外周T细胞淋巴瘤:7%HL及及NHL的发病率的发病率B-NHL 6632,66%UC 378,4%HL 854,9%T/NK-NHL 2138,21%病例总数:10002S
2、MZL,41,1%B-LBL,172,3%UC,387,6%DLBCL,NOS,3328,48%MCL,307,5%PCNs,221,3%BL,107,2%MMZL,99,1%LPL,57,1%DLBCL,SS,378,6%MALTL,685,10%FL,551,8%CLL/SLL,424,6%病例总数:6638B-NHL亚型的发病率亚型的发病率DLBCL FL MALTL MCL CLL/SLL BL SMZL NMZL弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤最常最常见见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤的非霍奇金淋巴瘤:31%发发病高峰病高峰:60岁岁临临床表床表现现及分子生物学特征及分子生物学特征:高度异高度异质质性性 大大细
3、细胞胞 无淋巴无淋巴滤滤泡泡结结构构中位生存期中位生存期:数周数周/月月(若不治若不治疗疗)30%到到 40%伴有伴有B 症状症状可能伴有可能伴有结结外病外病变变(胃胃肠肠道道,中枢神中枢神经经系系统统,睾丸睾丸,皮肤皮肤)Michallet AS,et al.Blood Rev.2009;23:11-23.2010年年NCCN指南指南:Essential Diagnostic Assessments for DLBCL对所有切片进行血液病理学检查对所有切片进行血液病理学检查(至少至少1个为含有肿瘤组织的石蜡块个为含有肿瘤组织的石蜡块)淋巴结切检淋巴结切检当淋巴结难以切除或切取活检时当淋巴结难
4、以切除或切取活检时,联合联合FNA和空心针活检并结合辅助检查和空心针活检并结合辅助检查时免疫表型时免疫表型:(DLBCL typically CD20+,CD45+,CD3-)免疫组化免疫组化(石蜡切片石蜡切片):CD20,CD3,CD4,CD10,CD45,BCL2,BCL6,Ki-67,IRF-4/MUM1流式细胞学流式细胞学:CD45,CD3,CD5,CD19,CD10,CD20,kappa/lambdaNCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology.2010.危险分组危险分组危险因素危险因素,n完全完全缓解缓解,%5年生存年生存率率,%Patients(all
5、 ages)低危0-18773中低危26751中高危 35543高危4-54426Patients 60 yrs of age or younger低危09283中低危17869中高危25746高危34632弥漫大弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的细胞淋巴瘤的预后因素预后因素不良预后因素影响化疗效果与生存期年龄60岁LDH 正常值一般状态评分 2Ann Arbor 分期 III/IV结外受累区 1 个*Prognostic for patients older than 60 yrs of age only.International NHL Prognosis Factors Project.N Engl
6、 J Med.1993;329:987-994.YrsPercent SurvivalVery goodGoodPoorP .0001基于修正基于修正IPI评分的总生存率评分的总生存率1.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10012345Sehn LH,et al.Blood.2007;109:1857-1861.与弥漫大与弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤相关的分子遗传学改变细胞淋巴瘤相关的分子遗传学改变遗传学异常较常见染色体异位:50%DNA 失衡:高达67%Gene(s)Affected/DisregulatedFrequency,%Predominant Causal Geneti
7、c AbnormalityMultiple45Aberrant SHMBcl-635-403q27 translocationsBcl-215/24t(14;18)/amplificationFas(CD95)2010q24 mutationsp531617p mutations/deletionsc-Myc15t(8;14)Potentially c-Rel142p13 amplificationAbramson JS,et al.Blood.2005;106:1164-1174.YrsOSDLBCL 亚型亚型5年生存率年生存率,%PMBL64GCB DLBCL59ABC DLBCL30基因
8、表达谱基因表达谱-分子水平将分子水平将DLBCL分为不同的临床分为不同的临床亚型亚型1.00.80.60.40.200246810Rosenwald A,et al.J Exp Med.2003;198:851-862.Rosenwald A,et al.N Engl J Med.2002;346:1937-1947.Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society.All rights reserved.00.20.40.60.81.0048Probability of Survival6102P 10 yrs 经过微阵列处理的相关性研究指标:比例风险
9、模式(FFS,OS)Winter JN,et al.ASH 2011.Abstract 87.基于基因表达的风险评分基于基因表达的风险评分-预测预测DLBCL临床结果临床结果N=183合格者,可评估案例6 genes for R-CHOP5 genes for CHOP(single gene overlap LMO2)High-vs low-gene risk scores significantly predicted E4494 clinical outcome(median follow-up:9.4 yrs)Winter JN,et al.ASH 2011.Abstract 87.基
10、于基因表达的风险评分基于基因表达的风险评分-预测预测DLBCL临床结果临床结果CHOPR-CHOPWinter JN,et al.ASH 2011.Abstract 87.Probability1.00.80.60.40.201202468 10YrsFFSP=.003 Median Median1.00.80.60.40.201202468 10YrsOSP=.001 Median Median1.00.80.60.40.201202468 10YrsFFSP=.0011.00.80.60.40.201202468 10YrsOSP=.0015基于基因表达的风险评分基于基因表达的风险评分-预
11、测预测DLBCL临床结果临床结果High-vs low-gene risk scores significantly predicted OSCHOP(median follow-up:7.6 yrs;P .0001)R-CHOP(median follow-up:2.8 yrs;P=.0014)基因风险评分对调整后的IPI多元分析具有预测意义Multivariate Analysis VariableHR for OSP ValueCHOP gene risk score2.39.0001CHOP IPI0.28.0001R-CHOP gene risk score1.82.06R-CHOP
12、 IPI0.38.002Winter JN,et al.ASH 2011.Abstract 87.基于基因表达的风险评分基于基因表达的风险评分-预测预测DLBCL临床结果临床结果该预测模型也可区分一些不同来源的细胞的差异CHOP:significant difference among nongerminal center B-cell(GCB)cases(P=.0002)R-CHOP:significant difference among GCB cases(P=.03)Molecular predictors largely independent of IPI in both CHOP
13、,R-CHOP patientsWinter JN,et al.ASH 2011.Abstract 87.IPI AdjustmentHRP ValueCHOPNone0.30.0001Gene risk score0.28.0001Cell of origin0.32.0001R-CHOPNone0.35.0006Gene risk score0.38.0016Cell of origin0.40.0026弥漫大弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的细胞淋巴瘤的治疗进展治疗进展初治初治DLBCLCHOP Rituximab in DLBCL:GELA LNH-98.5 Phase III StudyPrima
14、ry endpoint:EFSSecondary endpoints:OS,RRR-CHOPevery 3 wks for 8 cycles(n=202)CHOPevery 3 wks for 8 cycles(n=197)Untreated elderly patients with stage II-IV DLBCL(N=399)Stratified by risk factors(0-1 vs 2-3)AssessmentCoiffier B,et al.N Engl J Med.2002;346:235-242.Feugier P,et al.J Clin Oncol.2005;23:
15、4117-4126.Maint.Ritux.After R-CHOP or CHOP in Older DLBCL(E4494/C9793 Ph III Study)Primary endpoint:FFSMorrison VA,et al.ASCO 2007.Abstract 8011.Habermann TM,et al.J Clin Oncol.2006;24:3121-3127.Untreated patients with CD20+DLBCL,60 yrs of age or older,PS 0-3(N=632)R-CHOP x 6-8 cycles(n=318)CHOP x 6
16、-8 cycles(n=314)Stratified by IPI score(0-1 vs 2-4)Responders(n=415)Maintenance Rituximabq6mos x 2 yrs,starting 4 wks after last cycle(n=207)Observation(n=208)Stratified by IPI score,CR/PR,inductionCunningham D,et al.ASCO 2009.Abstract 8506.Newly diagnosed CD20+DLBCLpatients(N=1080)R-CHOP-14 x 6 cyc
17、les+Rituximab x 8 cycles+Lenograstim on Days 4-12(n=540)R-CHOP-21 x 8 cycles+Rituximab x 8 cycles(n=540)Stratified by IPI score and ageR-CHOP-14 vs R-CHOP-21 in Newly Diagnosed DLBCL(Phase III Study)Primary endpoint:OSSecondary endpoint:FFS,toxicity,response ratesResponse(Based on End of Treatment S
18、can),%R-CHOP-21(n=405*)R-CHOP-14(n=426*)CR/CRu(P=.183)6358CR/CRu/PR(P=.139)8891 CR4940 CRu1418 PR2432SD65PD/relapse64Cunningham D,et al.ASCO 2009.Abstract 8506.*249 patients not evaluable or data missing.R-CHOP-14 vs R-CHOP-21 in Newly Diagnosed DLBCL:ResponsesLNH03-6B GELA:R-CHOP-14 vs R-CHOP-21 in
19、 Elderly DLBCL PatientsPrimary endpoint:EFSSecondary endpoints:CR or CRu,ORR,PFS,DFS,OS,dose intensity,toxicityDelarue R,et al.ASH 2009.Abstract 406.R-CHOP every 14 days for 8 cycles+IT MTX for 4 cycles(n=103)R-CHOP every 21 days for 8 cycles+IT MTX for 4 cycles(n=99)DLBCL patients60-80 yrs of age(N
20、=202)ProphylacticDarbepoetin alfaConventional treatmentfor chemotherapy-induced anemiaProphylacticDarbepoetin alfaConventional treatmentfor chemotherapy-induced anemiaLNH03-6B GELA Trial:Results OutcomeR-CHOP-21(n=99)R-CHOP-14(n=103)P Value2-yr EFS,%6148.11Median EFS,mosNot reached22-2-yr PFS,%6349.
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤治疗新进展 ppt课件 弥漫 细胞 淋巴瘤 治疗 进展 ppt 课件
![提示](https://www.taowenge.com/images/bang_tan.gif)
限制150内