专题22 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解议论文狂练30篇（五年真题+最新模拟）-2024年新高考英语二轮复习含解析.docx

《专题22 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解议论文狂练30篇（五年真题+最新模拟）-2024年新高考英语二轮复习含解析.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《专题22 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解议论文狂练30篇（五年真题+最新模拟）-2024年新高考英语二轮复习含解析.docx（108页珍藏版）》请在淘文阁 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、2024年新高考英语二轮复习 【培优小题狂练】专题22 【培优小题狂练】阅读理解议论文狂练30篇（五年真题+最新模拟）原卷版【三年考情回顾】年份卷次主题语境题型分类2023年全国乙卷人与社会：物品纳入历史叙事以更好地理解无文字社会的重要性2个推理判断题1个主旨大意题1个词义猜测题2022年全国甲卷人与社会：悉尼发展中面临的问题1个细节理解题2个推理判断题1个主旨大意题2021年全国甲卷人与社会：“天才”有很多种形式1个细节理解题2个推理判断题1个主旨大意题全国乙卷人与社会：固定电话是非必需品2个推理判断题1个主旨大意题1个词义猜测题【题型应对策略】一、选材特点、文体特征和命题特点议论文，也叫说

2、理文，是一种剖析事物、论述事理、发表意见、提出主张的文体。作者通过摆事实、讲道理、辨是非等方法，来确定其观点的正确或错误，树立或否定某种主张。议论文的三要素是论点、论据和论证。论点是一篇文章的灵魂、统帅；论据是支撑论点的材料；论证是用论据来证明论点的方法和过程。主要具有以下特点：文章类型演绎论证议论文是从已知的原理规律出发，推知个别事物本质的论证方法。该类文体一般先提出一个总论点，然后分别进行论述，分析各个分论点，最后得出结论。归纳论证议论文是一种由个别到一般的论证方法。它通过许多个别的事例或分论点，然后归纳出它们所共有的特性，从而得出一个一般性的结论。比较论证议论文是一种由个别到个别的论证方

3、法。通常分为类比法和对比法两类。类比法是将性质或特点在某一方面相同或相近的不同事物加以比较而引出结论的方法。对比法是通过性质或特点在某一方面相反或对立的不同事物的比较来证明论点的方法。结构结构一：正方（甲方），反方（乙方），我认为结构二：提出问题，分析问题，回答（解决）问题结构三：论点，理由（证据），重申论点。解题技巧1.演绎论证议论文：注意文章的开篇，因为文章的开篇是文章的主旨，抓住了主旨，也就抓住了作者的观点，从而把握了文章的中心思想。2.归纳论证议论文：注意文章尾段，因为尾段是对前面所举事例和分论点的归纳和概括。3.比较论证议论文：注意事物的相同点以及不同点，并由此来把握文章的主旨。做题

4、时可使用以下三个步骤：重首尾，明方式，细推测。二、议论文应对策略高考英语议论文设题广泛，细节理解题、推理判断题、词句猜测题、主旨大意题都有可能出现，因此，在阅读议论文时，应该从结构和内容两方面同时入手，先通读原文，再区分事实和观点，明确论点、论证和论据，明了作者最后得出的结论。具体答题策略如下：【高考真题再练】1.（2023全国乙卷D篇）If you want to tell the history of the whole world, a history that does not privilege one part of humanity, you cannot do it throu

5、gh texts alone, because only some of the world has ever had texts, while most of the world, for most of the time, has not. Writing is one of humanitys later achievements, and until fairly recently even many literate (有文字的) societies recorded their concerns not only in writing but in things.Ideally a

6、 history would bring together texts and objects, and some chapters of this book are able to do just that, but in many cases we simply cant. The clearest example of this between literate and non-literate history is perhaps the first conflict, at Botany Bay, between Captain Cooks voyage and the Austra

7、lian Aboriginals. From the English side, we have scientific reports and the captains record of that terrible day. From the Australian side, we have only a wooden shield (盾) dropped by a man in flight after his first experience of gunshot. If we want to reconstruct what was actually going on that day

8、, the shield must be questioned and interpreted as deeply and strictly as the written reports.In addition to the problem of miscomprehension from both sides, there are victories accidentally or deliberately twisted, especially when only the victors know how to write. Those who are on the losing side

9、 often have only their things to tell their stories. The Caribbean Taino, the Australian Aboriginals, the African people of Benin and the Incas, all of whom appear in this book, can speak to us now of their past achievements most powerfully through the objects they made: a history told through thing

10、s gives them back a voice. When we consider contact (联系) between literate and non-literate societies such as these, all our first-hand accounts are necessarily twisted, only one half of a dialogue. If we are to find the other half of that conversation, we have to read not just the texts, but the obj

11、ects.32. What is the first paragraph mainly about?A. How past events should be presented.B. What humanity is concerned about.C. Whether facts speak louder than words.D. Why written language is reliable.33. What does the author indicate by mentioning Captain Cook in paragraph 2?A. His report was scie

12、ntific.B. He represented the local people.C. He ruled over Botany Bay.D. His record was one-sided.34. What does the underlined word “conversation” in paragraph 3 refer to?A. Problem.B. History.C. Voice.D. Society.35. Which of the following books is the text most likely selected from?A. How Maps Tell

13、 Stories of the WorldB. A Short History of AustraliaC. A History of the World in 100 ObjectsD. How Art Works Tell Stories2. （2022全国甲卷D篇）Sometime in the early 1960s, a significant thing happened in Sydney, Australia. The city discovered its harbor. Then, one after another, Sydney discovered lots of t

14、hings that were just sort of there broad parks, superb beaches, and a culturally diverse population. But it is the harbor that makes the city.Andrew Reynolds, a cheerful fellow in his early 30s, pilots Sydney ferryboats for a living. I spent the whole morning shuttling back and forth across the harb

15、or. After our third run Andrew shut down the engine, and we went our separate ways he for a lunch break, I to explore the city.“Ill miss these old boats,” he said as we parted.“How do you mean?” I asked.“Oh, theyre replacing them with catamarans. Catamarans are faster, but theyre not so elegant, and

16、 theyre not fun to pilot. But thats progress, I guess.”Everywhere in Sydney these days, change and progress are the watchwords (口号), and traditions are increasingly rare. Shirley Fitzgerald, the citys official historian, told me that in its rush to modernity in the 1970s, Sydney swept aside much of

17、its past, including many of its finest buildings. “Sydney is confused about itself,” she said. “We cant seem to make up our minds whether we want a modern city or a traditional one. Its a conflict that we arent getting any better at resolving (解决).”On the other hand, being young and old at the same

18、time has its attractions. I considered this when I met a thoughtful young businessman named Anthony. “Many people say that we lack culture in this country,” he told me. “What people forget is that the Italians, when they came to Australia, brought 2000 years of their culture, the Greeks some 3000 ye

19、ars, and the Chinese more still. Weve got a foundation built on ancient cultures but with a drive and dynamism of a young country. Its a pretty hard combination to beat.”He is right, but I cant help wishing they would keep those old ferries.32. What is the first paragraph mainly about?A. Sydneys str

20、iking architecture.B. The cultural diversity of Sydney.C. The key to Sydneys development.D. Sydneys tourist attractions in the 1960s.33. What can we learn about Andrew Reynolds?A. He goes to work by boat.B. He looks forward to a new life.C. He pilots catamarans well.D. He is attached to the old ferr

21、ies.34. What does Shirley Fitzgerald think of Sydney?A. It is losing its traditions.B. It should speed up its progress.C. It should expand its population.D. It is becoming more international.35. Which statement will the author probably agree with?A. A city can be young and old at the same time.B. A

22、city built on ancient cultures is more dynamic.C. modernity is usually achieved at the cost of elegance.D. Compromise should be made between the local and the foreign.2.（2021全国甲卷D篇）Who is a genius? This question has greatly interested humankind for centuries.Lets state clearly: Einstein was a genius

23、. His face is almost the international symbol for genius. But we want to go beyond one man and explore the nature of genius itself. Why is it that some people are so much more intelligent or creative than the rest of us? And who are they? In the sciences and arts, those praised as geniuses were most

24、 often white men, of European origin. Perhaps this is not a surprise. Its said that history is written by the victors, and those victors set the standards for admission to the genius club. When contributions were made by geniuses outside the clubwomen, or people of a different color or beliefthey we

25、re unacknowledged and rejected by others.A study recently published by Science found that as young as age six, girls are less likely than boys to say that members of their gender (性别) are “really, really smart.” Even worse, the study found that girls act on that belief: Around age six they start to

26、avoid activities said to be for children who are “really, really smart.” Can our planet afford to have any great thinkers become discouraged and give up? It doesnt take a genius to know the answer: absolutely not.Heres the good news. In a wired world with constant global communication, were all posi

27、tioned to see flashes of genius wherever they appear. And the more we look, the more we will see that social factors(因素)like gender, race, and class do not determine the appearance of genius. As a writer says, future geniuses come from those with “intelligence, creativity, perseverance (毅力), and sim

28、ple good fortune, who are able to change the world.”12. What does the author think of victors standards for joining the genius club?A. Theyre unfair. B. Theyre conservative. C. Theyre objective.D. Theyre strict.13. What can we infer about girls from the study in Science?A. They think themselves smar

29、t.B. They look up to great thinkers.C. They see gender differences earlier than boys.D. They are likely to be influenced by social beliefs14. Why are more geniuses known to the public?A. Improved global communication.B. Less discrimination against women.C. Acceptance of victors concepts.D. Changes i

30、n peoples social positions.15. What is the best title for the text?A. Geniuses Think AlikeB. Genius Takes Many FormsC. Genius and IntelligenceD. Genius and Luck4. （2019全国I卷D篇）During the rosy years of elementary school(小学), I enjoyed sharing my dolls and jokes, which allowed me to keep my high social

31、 status. I was the queen of the playground. Then came my tweens and teens, and mean girls and cool kids. They rose in the ranks not by being friendly but by smoking cigarettes, breaking rules and playing jokes on others, among whom I soon found myself.Popularity is a well-explored subject in social

32、psychology. Mitch Prinstein, a professor of clinical psychology sorts the popular into two categories: the likable and the status seekers. The likables plays-well-with-others qualities strengthen schoolyard friendships, jump-start interpersonal skills and, when tapped early, are employed ever after

33、in life and work. Then theres the kind of popularity that appears in adolescence: status born of power and even dishonorable behavior.Enviable as the cool kids may have seemed, Dr. Prinsteins studies show unpleasant consequences. Those who were highest in status in high school, as well as those leas

34、t liked in elementary school, are “most likely to engage(从事) in dangerous and risky behavior.”In one study, Dr. Prinstein examined the two types of popularity in 235 adolescents, scoring the least liked, the most liked and the highest in status based on student surveys (调查研究). “We found that the lea

35、st well-liked teens had become more aggressive over time toward their classmates. But so had those who were high in status. It clearly showed that while likability can lead to healthy adjustment, high status has just the opposite effect on us.Dr. Prinstein has also found that the qualities that made

36、 the neighbors want you on a play date-sharing, kindness, openness carry over to later years and make you better able to relate and connect with others.In analyzing his and other research, Dr. Prinstein came to another conclusion: Not only is likability related to positive life outcomes, but it is a

37、lso responsible for those outcomes, too. Being liked creates opportunities for learning and for new kinds of life experiences that help somebody gain an advantage ” he said.32. What sort of girl was the author in her early years of elementary school?A. Unkind. B. Lonely. C. Generous. D. Cool.33. Wha

38、t is the second paragraph mainly about?A. The classification of the popular.B. The characteristics of adolescents.C. The importance of interpersonal skills.D. The causes of dishonorable behavior.34. What did Dr. Prinsteins study find about the most liked kids?A. They appeared to be aggressive.B. The

39、y tended to be more adaptable.C. They enjoyed the highest status.D. They performed well academically.35. What is the best title for the text?A. Be Nice-You Wont Finish Last B. The Higher the Status, the Beer C. Be the Best-You Can Make It D. More Self-Control, Less Aggressiveness【最新名校模拟】【01】（2023上广东

40、深圳高三深圳市建文外国语学校校考期中）Think “art”. What comes to your mind? Is it Greek or Roman sculptures in the Louvre, or Chinese paintings in the Palace Museum? Or maybe, just maybe, its a dancing pattern of lights? The artworks by American artist Janet Echelman look like colourful floating clouds when they are l

41、it up at night. Visitors to one of her artworks in Vancouver could not only enjoy looking at it, they could also interact with it-literally. They did this by using their phones to change its colours and patterns. Exhibits such as these are certainly new and exciting, but are they really art? Whateve

42、r your opinion, people have been expressing their thoughts and ideas through art for thousands of years. To do this, they have used a variety of tools and technologies. Yet Michelangelo and others have been labelled (定义) as “artists”, but not “technicians”. This means that art and technology, have a

43、lways been seen as two very separate (不同的) things. Today, however, technological advances have led to a combination of art and technology. As a result, the art world is changing greatly. Now art is more accessible to us than ever before. Take for example one of Chinas most famous paintings from the

44、Song Dynasty, Along the River During the Qingming Festival. As this artwork is rarely on display, people have sometimes queued up to six hours for a chance to see it. Once in front of the painting, they only have limited time to spend taking in its five metres of scenes along the Bian River in Bianj

45、ing. Thanks to technology however, millions more people have been able to experience a digital version of this painting. Three-dimensional (3D) animation means that viewers can see the characters move around and interact with their surroundings. They can also watch as the different scenes change fro

46、m daylight into nighttime. The art-tech combination (结合) is also changing our concepts of “art” and the “artist”. Not only can we interact with art, but also take part in its creation. With new technological tools at our fingertips, more and more people are exploring their creative sides. The result

47、 has been exciting new art forms, such as digital paintings and videos. However, where technology will take art next is anyones guess. But one thing is for surewith so many artists exploring new possibilities, we can definitely expect the unexpected.1. Whats the function of the first paragraph?A. To

48、 explain the art.B. To introduce the topic.C. To give the background.D. To give a definition.2. Why is “Michelangelo” referred to in the third paragraph?A. To show he is a famous artist.B. To show he is also a technician.C. To show art is different from technology.D. To show art is the same as technology.3. Whats mainly talked about in the passage?A. The history of technology and art.B. The relation of technology and art.C. The future of technology and